On Sun 15 Apr, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > CD's may in fact contain content from the Debian site and it should be
> > possible to validate that content was part of a Debian release without
> > having to jump through any special hopps. That is independen
Le Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:16:11AM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> > Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image
> > configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg
> > tonight cdimage.debian.org still has no idea about 2.2r3 - shouldnt .isos
> > be part of t
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:16:11AM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> > > Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image
> > > configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg
> > > tonight cdimage.debian.org still has no idea about 2.2r3 -
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:16:11AM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> > > Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image
> > > configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg
> > > tonight cdimage.debian.org still has
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:50:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:16:11AM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
> > > Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image
> > > configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg
> > > tonight cdimage.d
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:45:50PM +0100, lance wrote:
> The other alternative would be to produce an update cd that contained the
> updates from 2.2r2 to 2.2r3 - especially if the update cd could be the cd
> to install from :)
That's not a bad idea, really. A minimal CD#1 that includes all the
c
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:45:50PM +0100, lance wrote:
>
>The other alternative would be to produce an update cd that contained the
>updates from 2.2r2 to 2.2r3 - especially if the update cd could be the cd
>to install from :)
>
>All I am asking for is enough time to make a reasonable effort at ma
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:08:17AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
>On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:00:41PM +0100, lance wrote:
>
>> If it turns out that the changes take up more than a CD then maybe it
>> shouldnt be a point release after all ??
>
>I doubt the changes run to anything like a CD full. Ho
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for having been this silent. In the past few days I've spent
> many hours on getting debian-cd ready for 2.2 rev3 (issues you
> mentioned, updated/ redesigned README (matching www.d.o but actually
> better code) and the long-promised "make-a-usef
Greetings -
I am currently creating a set of Debian 2.2r2 cd images. However, I
would like to actually burn the 2.2r3 versions. Can I simply rsynch the
2.2r2 images to a 2.2r3 site when they come out? Or do I have to
make-pseudo-image and rsynch off of the 2.2r3 images?
Tony -
--
Evil Twin -
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Attila Nagy wrote:
AN> Hello,
AN>
AN> > I downloaded from ftp.fsn.hu::cdimages/debian-unofficial/woody the
AN> > last cd-images of woody, but all the Packages files inside them appear
AN> > to be empty. Is it OK?
AN> Yupp, last week I've changed my machine and forget to insta
Anthony 'Evil Twin' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings -
>
> I am currently creating a set of Debian 2.2r2 cd images. However, I
> would like to actually burn the 2.2r3 versions. Can I simply rsynch the
> 2.2r2 images to a 2.2r3 site when they come out?
You certainly can.
The way we're
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've made an error last week so here are the new SID and WOODY CD images.
[snip]
> The mirrors (at least ftp.se.debian.org and ftp.planetmirror.com) will
> catch up soon, I think they have a stronger machine ;)
We now have the woody and sid im
On 19 Apr 2001, Philip Hands wrote:
> "J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry for having been this silent. In the past few days I've spent
> > many hours on getting debian-cd ready for 2.2 rev3 (issues you
> > mentioned, updated/ redesigned README (matching www.d.o but actually
>
> Sorry for having been this silent. In the past few days I've spent many hours
> on getting debian-cd ready for 2.2 rev3 (issues you mentioned, updated/
> redesigned README (matching www.d.o but actually better code) and the
> long-promised "make-a-useful-CD1" project which involved lots of test
Hmmm. Update-cd seems to be coping fine with the r3 update, EXCEPT
that the resulting images are significantly smaller than the r2
ones. This is somewhat puzzling...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~stevem/>My home page
"Can
16 matches
Mail list logo
