On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > No more than all the other ugly things that have been suggested, and this
> > only affects the 3 people silly enough to loopback mount ISO's and try to
> > use APT on them.
>
> I have used this myself.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > > No more than all the other ugly things that have been suggested, and this
> > > only affects the 3 people silly enough to loopback mount ISO's and try
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to say this.
I have been trying to make a copy of the Debian CD-ROM and the
"potato-i386-1.list" seems to have an error, typo most likely. The
following three line have commas instead of underscore in the file name.
Or it could be that they were changed by
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> > > b) Use verbatim package files and call them 'Packages.something'
> > > - Everyone can make CD set, and we still have end-to-end security
> > > - apt file:/../ does not work properly on those discs
I think that we are trying to turn apples into oranges. The security of
CDs is relatively simple, that of a mirror more complex and they need to
be approached differently.
A mirror can have one corrupt or sabotaged file amongst 2-3 and there
needs to be a way of detecting this. The proposed
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:06:09PM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> That's because APT (and ONLY apt) is effectively changing the very definition
> of "Packages file". Up to this moment:
> Packages = file that is an index to all packages (virtually) available
> in&under current director
Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:27:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> Instead of changing the name of the Packages file, how about we try something
> completely different?
>
> dists/ woody-secured/
[...]
> That should be pretty easy to do right now, and shouldn't cause any
> problems to anyon
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 06:05:04PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:27:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns ?crivait:
>> Instead of changing the name of the Packages file, how about we try something
>> completely different?
>>
>> dists/ woody-secured/
>[...]
>> That should be p
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:14:30PM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> >
> > > > you can tell it to read Packages.cd directly
> >
> > > I don't want that, it's a hack. :)
> >
> > No more than all the other ugly things that have been suggested, and th
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:27:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> > So anyway, how does the above idea (two woody trees in dists),
> > sound? Workable, or are there other problems?
>
> I don't see any apart from the fact that most tools will use
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> > Nope, packages fails verification and APT will stop without using the
> > file, ditto for ftp, http, etc.
>
> EVERY access method up to current potato APT will work nicely with this. If
> woody/sid APT suddenly stops working correctly, thats a grave
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
> A CD (or iso image) is essentially one file and the integrity of this can
> be verified by a single signed checksum.
No, that is such an oversimplification and what you have described of the
HURD CD's prooves that.
CD's may in fact contain content f
Repository: debian-cd/debian
who:hertzog
time: Sat Apr 14 13:57:06 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* Create a $CODENAME-secured tree with Release and Release.gpg file.
* Some esthetic cleanup.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Repository: debian-cd
who:hertzog
time: Sat Apr 14 13:57:06 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* Create a $CODENAME-secured tree with Release and Release.gpg file.
* Some esthetic cleanup.
Files:
changed:Makefile
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:hertzog
time: Sat Apr 14 13:57:06 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* Create a $CODENAME-secured tree with Release and Release.gpg file.
* Some esthetic cleanup.
Files:
changed:scanpackages scansources
added: add_secured
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Le Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 02:05:35PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> How exactly do you propose that apt-cdrom determine that these two random
> trees of stuff are actually the same tree of stuff? Current apt-cdrom will
> not properly handle CD's made like this, so you've broke that.
Explain us
Hello,
> > I have used this myself. It is a good way to test an image. It is also
> > used by people who have borrowed CDs and do not have a burner.
I think a validity checking part in debian-cd would be very nice.
BTW, what's the correct way to check an ISO made with the debian-cd
script?
And
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:hertzog
time: Sat Apr 14 15:38:51 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* Corrections. Include Release file in the main Release file.
Files:
changed:add_secured
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 02:05:35PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> > How exactly do you propose that apt-cdrom determine that these two random
> > trees of stuff are actually the same tree of stuff? Current apt-cdrom will
> > not properly handle C
Repository: debian-cd/tools/boot/woody
who:hertzog
time: Sat Apr 14 17:32:55 PDT 2001
Log Message:
* Changed UDMA66 to IDE according to the latest boot floppies.
Files:
changed:boot-i386
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Hi people,
I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only manty
helped me debug it this night), and I'd welcome other results to be sure
it's ok.
I also made a change to work with the latest boot floppies where
Le Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 05:02:10PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> Having more than one tree means it will be detected more than once and
> that certianly is not desirable, any may cause problems, like it asking
> for the disks in a non-ideal order, or something equally lame.
May or will cause
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Having more than one tree means it will be detected more than once and
> > that certianly is not desirable, any may cause problems, like it asking
> > for the disks in a non-ideal order, or something equally lame.
> May or will cause problem ?
I
- Original Message -
From: "Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Call for test and some thoughts
> I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
> about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only
manty
> helped me debug it this night), and I'
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:41:08AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
> about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only manty
> helped me debug it this night), and I'd welcome other results to be sure
> it's ok.
BTW
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:15:49PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Having more than one tree means it will be detected more than once and
> > > that certianly is not desirable, any may cause problems, like it asking
> > > for the disks in a non-ide
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Having random insecure files, however tempting they may look, shouldn't
> stop a user from at least knowing whether they're using something straight
> from Debian or not.
I would prefer that instructions be as simple as possible to minimize
errors. I
27 matches
Mail list logo
