Re: jigdo and unofficial Debian images

2004-06-12 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 01:08:13PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Would it be possible (or even reasonable given load usage constraints) to > base the unstable jigdo images off of the snapshot.debian.net archive? > That provides an unmoving snapshot of sid. I would hate to overload > their archive, h

Re: jigdo and unofficial Debian images

2004-06-12 Thread Bob Proulx
Richard Atterer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The most common problem with jigdo I've found is that what is specified > > in the .jigdo file to be downloaded to complete the image is not an > > accurate reflection of what actually exists on the corresponding mirror. > > This is a general

Re: jigdo and unofficial Debian images

2004-06-11 Thread Richard Atterer
Hi tpc, sorry to hear about your trouble with jigdo. On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:48:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The most common problem with jigdo I've found is that what is specified > in the .jigdo file to be downloaded to complete the image is not an > accurate reflection of what act

jigdo and unofficial Debian images

2004-06-10 Thread tpc
hi Richard, after trying all day to bend jigdo to my will, I have to throw up my hands in exasperation and tell you jigdo is not ready for primetime. I understand you are a volunteer and as such what you've attempted to create is commendable, but what you've told us jigdo is intended to do and what