Re: jigdo-port/lite/lite2win (Re: web pages)

2002-01-28 Thread Richard Atterer
Snipping quite a lot - assume an "agreed" for all that!-) On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 06:20:04PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: [snip] > > - Hack mkhybrid to output .jigdo/.template instead of raw ISO9660 > >data. This would make the template generation a lot faster - > >imagine daily "testing"

Re: jigdo-port/lite/lite2win (Re: web pages)

2002-01-26 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Richard Atterer wrote: [Sorry for the late reply. My mail-R/W intervals are short and sparsely distributed in time. This message was written during several of these intervals the past few days. I just read that jigdo 0.6.2 is available, but I haven't had time to check that o

Re: jigdo-port/lite/lite2win (Re: web pages)

2002-01-19 Thread Richard Atterer
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:59:11PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > As far as I'm concerned, jigdo has just left beta stage. (That's the > jigdo scheme, not necessarily jigdo 0.6.1 ;-) Hm, for *me* jigdo will be finished the moment my mother can download a CD image without me giving her any instructi

Re: jigdo-port/lite/lite2win (Re: web pages)

2002-01-18 Thread Mattias Wadenstein
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Richard Atterer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:34:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > [..] > > > It seems the best thing would be to decide finally if we're going to > > > push jigdo or not. We can't have it recommended and mark

jigdo-port/lite/lite2win (Re: web pages)

2002-01-18 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:34:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: [..] > > It seems the best thing would be to decide finally if we're going to > > push jigdo or not. We can't have it recommended and mark it > > beta, that's an oxymoron, at least in Debian.