Bug#1108455: debian-cd: Installer images include two versions of kernel udebs

22 22:39 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso > > That happens when building images from d-i daily builds, built against > sid. That doesn't happen when building against an official d-i, built > against testing. > > I'd prefer not merging this patch before the upcoming D-I

Bug#1108455: debian-cd: Installer images include two versions of kernel udebs

Hi, Daniel Lewart (2025-06-29): > The Weekly build of the installer image for amd64 has grown by 4%: > * 811597824 Jun 16 00:23 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.is0 > * 846200832 Jun 22 22:39 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso That happens when building images from d-i daily builds, buil

Bug#1108455: debian-cd: Installer images include two versions of kernel udebs

Hi, Daniel Lewart (2025-06-29): > However, linux Commit 706d933b: > Include target Debian release number in ABI name > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/706d933b > causes the problem in this bug report. Full backstory: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/

Bug#1108455: debian-cd: Installer images include two versions of kernel udebs

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.2 Severity: normal Tags: d-i patch Dear Debian Images Team, The Weekly build of the installer image for amd64 has grown by 4%: * 811597824 Jun 16 00:23 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.is0 * 846200832 Jun 22 22:39 debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso This is caused

Bug#1032071: marked as done (ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Jun 2025 20:34:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1032071: fixed in debian-cd 3.2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032071, regarding ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found (2025-06-16 and 2025-06-09)

Thank you everyone for working on this and getting the live builds up again. I already installed it on my machine. Regards, John Anderson On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 04:57, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:23:46PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > >Hello Steve, lists, > > > >On 16/06

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found (2025-06-16 and 2025-06-09)

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:23:46PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello Steve, lists, > >On 16/06/2025 09:30, Roland Clobus wrote: >> I'll write again when the workaround got removed [1] and it will be >> possible to (re)trigger the weekly builds. > >The workaround has been removed and a local build

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found (2025-06-16 and 2025-06-09)

Hello Steve, lists, On 16/06/2025 09:30, Roland Clobus wrote: I'll write again when the workaround got removed [1] and it will be possible to (re)trigger the weekly builds. The workaround has been removed and a local build worked for me. Steve, could you trigger the weekly build again? Than

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found (2025-06-16 and 2025-06-09)

Hello lists, John Anderson, On 12/06/2025 15:49, John Kerr Anderson wrote: Thank you everyone for your help and information.  I can wait patiently for the images to be available again. I appreciate your time and effort in making Debian the great OS that it is. The package busybox got

Re: Unblock of busybox (Was: Weekly Testing Images Not Found)

Roland Clobus (2025-06-15): > I've fetched (with dget) both the 1.37.0-5 and 1.37.0-6 packages. Using > diffoscope I can confirm that the only change between these versions is in > the file 'debian/config/pkg/udeb'. So for users of busybox outside the scope > of udebs, there is no change at all.

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found

Thank you everyone for your help and information. I can wait patiently for the images to be available again. I appreciate your time and effort in making Debian the great OS that it is. Regards, John Anderson On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 07:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Roland Clob

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found

Hi, Roland Clobus (2025-06-12): > +CC: bug report > > Hello Steve, lists, > > On 12/06/2025 12:48, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > I've just triggered a manual rebuild now, so hopefully new images will > > be in place in a couple of hours. > > Erm... It turns

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found

+CC: bug report Hello Steve, lists, On 12/06/2025 12:48, Steve McIntyre wrote: I've just triggered a manual rebuild now, so hopefully new images will be in place in a couple of hours. Erm... It turns out that the failure is not transient... The build error is caused by a newer versi

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found

gt;> Not Found >> >> The requested URL was not found on this server. >> >> >> Apache/2.4.63 (Unix) Server at cdimage.debian.org > cdimage.debian.org> Port 443 >> >> How soon will these images be available a

Re: Weekly Testing Images Not Found

debian.org cdimage.debian.org> Port 443 How soon will these images be available again? The weekly images for testing rarely break nowadays, you had an unlucky timing. This time is was the transition of wget from busybox to udeb. You'll have to wait until next Monday when they are generat

Re: Saving some space on installation images

Steve McIntyre (2025-05-15): > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:08:23AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into > >installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have > >a number of unused udeb packages

Bug#1105988: marked as done (cdimage.debian.org: stop building images for mips64el)

Your message dated Sun, 18 May 2025 19:18:59 +0100 with message-id <20250518181858.ga103...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1105965: Remove mips64el from testing has caused the Debian Bug report #1105988, regarding cdimage.debian.org: stop building images for mips64el to be mar

Keeping prestera firmware out of netinst images

Hi, Just so that it doesn't take anyone by surprise, while tracking big packages (my historical test setup still tries to build 680M netinst images even if production builds can go up to 1G), I've spotted a big firmware package that doesn't seem to be usable with the current k

Re: Saving some space on installation images

On 15/05/2025 at 05:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have a number of unused udeb packages getting included. In other words, we could save some space! I suspect that

Re: Saving some space on installation images

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:08:23AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into >installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have >a number of unused udeb packages getting included. In other words,

Saving some space on installation images

Hi, Having my eyes on *.list.gz (list of deb/udeb packages included into installation images) during successive builds made me realize we have a number of unused udeb packages getting included. In other words, we could save some space! I'm not trying to build a list right now (still lots

Re: Old debian-mac-*-netinst.iso images

On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:50:20PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > Hello list, > > Today an article [1] mentioned that the last MacMini with Intel (2018) is > now considered 'vintage', and the other MacMini models are already > 'obsolete' [2]. > > I recently tried to boot a MacMini 4.1 (from 2010)

Re: Old debian-mac-*-netinst.iso images

d CD-ROM device. It boots in the 'Windows' mode, but not in the UEFI mode. The 12.10 GNOME live image boots in both modes. I haven't tried to use any of the netinst images yet. Do you think it is worth the effort to reactivate support for this hardware? With kind regards, Roland Clobu

Weekly live images from 2025-04-07 incomplete

Hello, during the build of the weekly live images from 2025-04-07, there were some hiccups in the build architecture, which results in many images that could not be built. An example: https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-testing-amd64-cinnamon.log

Re: Weekly live images from 2025-04-07 incomplete

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:22:30AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello, > >during the build of the weekly live images from 2025-04-07, there were some >hiccups in the build architecture, which results in many images that could >not be built. > >An example: >https://get.debia

Bug#1057844: Firmware/dep11 is now present on live images

Hello Steve, The live images should now fully support the firmware/dep11 files as present on the netinst images (since [1]) With the upcoming 12.11 point release, the dep11 files will be present in the bookworm images as well. As noted in the Bookworm 12.10 release notes [2], could you

Re: Old debian-mac-*-netinst.iso images

al amd64 ISO from USB stick works on the affected Macs. Roland Clobus wrote: > If the netinst and live images are able to properly detect the hardware they > are running on (including firmware bugs etc), I think it would be nice to > remove the mac-specific images. At the stage when the

Re: Old debian-mac-*-netinst.iso images

On 15/03/2025 19:31, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: We currently still build debian-mac-12.10.0-i386-netinst.iso and debian-mac-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso images. These are for an *old* Intel-based Mac Mini that had issues with image booting from certain disk layouts. From the wiki https

Bug#268791: marked as done (No way to create basedebs.tar from CD images set)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2025 19:21:49 + with message-id <2c7b4656697de59e4fda81b582a157b7b41b992d.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re:Bug#268791: No way to create basedebs.tar from CD images set has caused the Debian Bug report #268791, regarding No way to

Bug#570770: marked as done (Debian Edu squeeze images)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2025 19:07:04 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#570770: Debian Edu squeeze images has caused the Debian Bug report #570770, regarding Debian Edu squeeze images to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#813662: marked as done (cdimage.debian.org: weekly builds of live images are stale)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2025 18:59:01 + with message-id and subject line Re: cdimage.debian.org: weekly builds of live images are stale has caused the Debian Bug report #813662, regarding cdimage.debian.org: weekly builds of live images are stale to be marked as done. This means that

Old debian-mac-*-netinst.iso images

We currently still build debian-mac-12.10.0-i386-netinst.iso and debian-mac-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso images. These are for an *old* Intel-based Mac Mini that had issues with image booting from certain disk layouts. From the wiki https://wiki.debian.org/MacMiniIntel#Macmini_2.2C1 - this was a

Changes in the bookworm live images

Hello debian-cd, even though the Debian packages are unchanged, the live images get new functionality/bugfixes for each point release. These are the major changes: New in 12.9: the live images have 'spice-vdagent' installed per default, which makes it easier to run the live imag

Re: Fix for d-i in the trixie live images

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 12:34:28PM +0100, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello list, > >Some time ago I was a bit too quick, and changed the source for the d-i >installer in the weekly live images. >That worked fine, until a newer kernel version was released. > >Currently (e.g. with

Fix for d-i in the trixie live images

Hello list, Some time ago I was a bit too quick, and changed the source for the d-i installer in the weekly live images. That worked fine, until a newer kernel version was released. Currently (e.g. with the 2025-03-03 weekly images from [1]), the installer does not work, and complains that

Re: Missing Debian Testing Live Images -> resolved

Hello Drew Stephens, On 17/01/2025 04:07, Drew Stephens wrote: I found out today that the download links on https://www.debian.org/CD/ live/ <https://www.debian.org/CD/live/> are broken. Yes, I reported that on Tuesday [1] and a fix is under way. Monday the images will be built again.

Re: Weekly live images from 2025-01-13 not built -> resolved

Hello list, On 14/01/2025 22:44, Roland Clobus wrote: the weekly live images from 2025-01-13 have not been built. I found the cause: the image for GRUB was moved in the upstream Github repository. A fix [1] is currently being merged, and Monday the images will be built again. Perhaps I

Missing Debian Testing Live Images

/CD/live/ are broken. If you look in the archive folder this broken links lead to (https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/), there are logs for the generation of each ISO image, but not the images themselves; the logs all say “error on first pass” (like this one

Weekly live images from 2025-01-13 not built

Hello list, the weekly live images from 2025-01-13 [1] have not been built. Unfortunately, the log files are really short [1], so I'm unable to track the cause. Building the standard image locally works fine. Could a config file from the bookworm 12.9 release still linger on the build s

Bug#1080207: lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network

On Fri, 06 Sep 2024 at 00:01:55 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > >> > 2. Connman is running a DNS server on 127.0.0.1, which apt uses to > >> >     look up deb.debian.org > >> > 3. That DNS server does not fail if no network is availabl

Re: Live images url's broken

because of image sizes may explain why >> the URLs aren't working right at the moment. > >The broken live builds are another consequence of the usr-is-merged >breakage. In that directory you'll see log files for all images (add >.log to the gnome iso for example), they only cont

Re: Live images url's broken

sues releasing source media because of image sizes may explain why > the URLs aren't working right at the moment. The broken live builds are another consequence of the usr-is-merged breakage. In that directory you'll see log files for all images (add .log to the gnome iso for example), they

Re: Live images url's broken

On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 07:26:56PM -0500, Fabrice Quenneville wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to download a Trixie live iso and it seems all url's on the > website are broken and iso's missing from the repository: > > >From https://www.debian.org/CD/live/ those url's are broken: > >- The Trixie A

Live images url's broken

Hi, I wanted to download a Trixie live iso and it seems all url's on the website are broken and iso's missing from the repository: >From https://www.debian.org/CD/live/ those url's are broken: - https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-testing-amd

Re: Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

Hi, Am 28. Dezember 2024 11:12:55 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : > >Looking at riscv64, it seems to have become an official release arch a >little while back[1]. Its images tarball features netboot stuff (hence >this question regarding d-i-n-i[2]), but also cdrom things: Maybe riscv6

Re: Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

Hi, On 2024-12-28 11:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hello images team, > > This just happened: > > Copying installer version 20241227 from unstable to testing > > Will copy installer version 20241227 from suite unstable to > testing. > Architectures to

Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

Hello images team, This just happened: Copying installer version 20241227 from unstable to testing Will copy installer version 20241227 from suite unstable to testing. Architectures to copy: amd64, ppc64el, s390x, armhf, arm64, mips64el, riscv64 Architectures to skip

Registration of New Debian ISO images Mirror - https://mirrors.upr.edu/debian-cd/

Dear Debian Mirror Team, We are writing to formally register a new mirror for the Debian-CD at the University of Puerto Rico. We currently operate a formal mirror of Debian at https://mirrors.upr.edu/debian/ and would like to extend our service by offering a mirror for the debian-cd archive as

Re: Nov 18, 2024 Weekly live images not built -> Solved

Hello list, On 20/11/2024 23:12, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:56:00PM -0600, Daniel Lewart wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:16:30 -0600, I wrote: Weekly builds of live images for amd64: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ Files

Re: Nov 18, 2024 Weekly live images not built

On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:16:30 -0600, I wrote: > Weekly builds of live images for amd64: > > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ > Files are from Nov 11, 2024. > Live images were not built this morning (Nov 18, 2024). > What went wro

Re: Nov 18, 2024 Weekly live images not built

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:56:00PM -0600, Daniel Lewart wrote: >On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:16:30 -0600, I wrote: > >> Weekly builds of live images for amd64: >> >> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ >> Files are from Nov 11,

Nov 18, 2024 Weekly live images not built

Debian Images Team, Weekly builds of live images for amd64: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ Files are from Nov 11, 2024. Live images were not built this morning (Nov 18, 2024). What went wrong? Thank you! Daniel Lewart Urbana, Illinois

Re: Weekly live images from 2024-11-04 not built

Hello list, On 04/11/2024 15:06, Roland Clobus wrote: the weekly live images from 2024-11-04 have not been built. I've implemented a workaround in live-build and today all images have been generated. https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ Still: i

Re: Bug#1086807: live-build: weekly live testing images not generated

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 12:07, Roland Clobus wrote: > On 06/11/2024 11:26, Leandro Doctors wrote: > > Q2: Is there a way to access the last successful build of the live images? > > Yes, you can ... > * ... use your previously downloaded file, if you still have that > * ...

Re: Bug#1086807: live-build: weekly live testing images not generated

Control: severity 1086807 normal Control: retitle 1086807 Weekly images 2024-11-04 not generated Hello Leandro, On 06/11/2024 11:26, Leandro Doctors wrote: When opening https://cdimage.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso- hybrid/, instead of finding the weekly live images I find log

Weekly live images from 2024-11-04 not built

Hello list, the weekly live images from 2024-11-04 have not been built. They bail out due to the following error message: -- Start quote -- The following packages have unmet dependencies: firmware-realtek : Conflicts: firmware-realtek-rtl8723cs-bt but 20181104-4 is to be installed -- End

Bug#1080207: lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >> Hello Steve, list, >> >> On 31/08/2024 19:47, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > Found in testing of the 12.7.0 live images. >> > >> > Doing a live installation using calamares from eithe

Bug#1080207: lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network

Hello Steve, list, On 01/09/2024 16:04, Roland Clobus wrote: Hello Steve, list, On 31/08/2024 19:47, Steve McIntyre wrote: Found in testing of the 12.7.0 live images. Doing a live installation using calamares from either of these images fails if no network is available. That is an openQA

Bug#1080207: lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network

Hello Steve, list, On 31/08/2024 19:47, Steve McIntyre wrote: Found in testing of the 12.7.0 live images. Doing a live installation using calamares from either of these images fails if no network is available. That is an openQA-scenario that I have been working on, but did not complete yet

Bug#1080207: Acknowledgement (lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network)

Testing shows that there is no sign of this issue in the equivalent 11.11 live images. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Das Mohapatra

Bug#1080207: lxde and lxqt bookworm live images fail to install without network

Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l...@lists.debian.org Found in testing of the 12.7.0 live images. Doing a live installation using calamares from either of these images fails if no network is available. Running /usr/sbin/bootloader-config fails to install the

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hello Steve, list, > On 27/07/2024 23:51, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > ... >>>> The MR is at >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/5 >>>> >

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hello Steve, On 27/07/2024 23:51, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: ... The MR is at https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/5 Let's start only with a GNOME image at first. I'll update the matching openQA

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

M +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >>> > >>> > Since the Minidebconf in Hamburg earlier this year, the support for arm64 >>> > in >>> > the Debian live images has seen a lot of progress. >>... >>> > I could prepare a MR >> >>

Re: Friendly ping: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:12:48AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello list, Steve, > >On 05/07/2024 21:42, Roland Clobus wrote: >> > I'll prepare a patch, and hopefully the next set of live images >> > (12.6.1 or 12.7.0) will be fully reproducible. >>

Re: Friendly ping: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hello list, Steve, On 05/07/2024 21:42, Roland Clobus wrote: I'll prepare a patch, and hopefully the next set of live images (12.6.1 or 12.7.0) will be fully reproducible. This should do the trick: https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/6 Have you found the ti

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hi Roland! This sounds great - I have one specific question / concern: On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 17:44, Roland Clobus wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > live-setup uses a local cache of the git repository of live-build, to > avoid being blocklisted by salsa for heavy traffic, caused by parallel > builds. >

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

On 03/07/2024 18:44, Roland Clobus wrote: ... I'll prepare a patch, and hopefully the next set of live images (12.6.1 or 12.7.0) will be fully reproducible. This should do the trick: https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/6 With kind regards, Roland C

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Hello lists, > >I'm sooo close... > >Now that that 12.6 live images have been generated [1], there is only one >embedded timestamp left (/boot/grub/live-theme/theme.txt and its parent >folder) >I

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Roland Clobus writes: > Hello lists, > > I'm sooo close... > > Now that that 12.6 live images have been generated [1], there is only > one embedded timestamp left (/boot/grub/live-theme/theme.txt and its > parent folder) > I've not seen this timestamp issu

Re: Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hi Roland, On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:44:37PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > I'm sooo close... [...] hehe, congrats & thanks for keeping us in the loop! In honor of your work I've manually written the signature of this email...! :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|re

Nearly reproducible Bookworm 12.6 live images

Hello lists, I'm sooo close... Now that that 12.6 live images have been generated [1], there is only one embedded timestamp left (/boot/grub/live-theme/theme.txt and its parent folder) I've not seen this timestamp issue before, as I am using a slightly different way of building

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

g earlier this year, the support for arm64 >> > in >> > the Debian live images has seen a lot of progress. >... >> > I could prepare a MR > >The MR is at >https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/live-setup/-/merge_requests/5 > >Let's start only with a GN

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hello Steve, list, On 23/06/2024 22:33, Steve McIntyre wrote: Hey Roland! On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: Since the Minidebconf in Hamburg earlier this year, the support for arm64 in the Debian live images has seen a lot of progress. ... I could prepare a MR

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hey Roland! On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 11:39:05AM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: > >Since the Minidebconf in Hamburg earlier this year, the support for arm64 in >the Debian live images has seen a lot of progress. >Together with Emanuele Rocca, I was able to to confirm that live images tha

Re: Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hi, Roland Clobus wrote: > The latest gnome image took 3 hours according to the log [2]. > [2] > https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-testing-amd64-gnome.log > (from 03:12:32 to 06:04:48) Interesting log. There are two time zones used in

Request: more images in the weekly build -> arm64

Hello Steve, list, Since the Minidebconf in Hamburg earlier this year, the support for arm64 in the Debian live images has seen a lot of progress. Together with Emanuele Rocca, I was able to to confirm that live images that are built natively on arm64 contain the same as the cross-built live

ISO images with malicious code

, shouldn't these images be removed? P.S. I know there is a 'Valid-Until:' in '/dists/trixie/Release' in the ISO image, but changing this is no problem.

Re: problems with amd64 testing images

more than 2 weeks old (2024-03-09) and there are no newer images > for amd64 Some pointers: - https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg5.html - https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/03/msg00013.html > Please CC when replying since I am not on the list Done. Cheers

problems with amd64 testing images

newer images for amd64 Please CC when replying since I am not on the list -- j.hofmüller Optimism doesn't alter the laws of physics. - Subcommander T'Pol

Bug#1062000: marked as done (debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Feb 2024 20:52:08 + with message-id <20240201205208.gg2747...@tack.einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#1062000: debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section has caused the Debian Bug report #1062000, regarding debian-cd: Bookworm images are missi

Bug#1062000: debian-cd: Bookworm images are missing the contrib section

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: mikeonthecompu...@gmail.com Debian 12, bookworm, images are missing the contrib section of the repositories in their entirety. This prevents the use of, for instance, installing ZFS on an offline computer. There is quite a lot

Re: Weekly builds of installer/live images failing

Hello Daniel, On 16/01/2024 09:52, Daniel Lewart wrote: However, on Jan 8 and 15, the weekly builds of installer/live images have been failing. I'll guess that these are part of the fallout from "the big linux changes": https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2023/1

Weekly builds of installer/live images failing

Debian Images and Live Teams, First I would like to thank Roland Clobus, et al, for your excellent achievement of creating reproducible live images. However, on Jan 8 and 15, the weekly builds of installer/live images have been failing. I'll guess that these are part of the fallout from &qu

Bug#1057844: bookworm live images: d-i speech installation not loading sof firmware

nkpad T14s) with the amd64 netinst, it >> successfully loads firmware and starts the speech installer. > >This isn't new for Bookworm 12.3, is it? There has been no change in the >images generated by live-build regarding the /firmware folder, they have >always contained j

Bug#1057844: bookworm live images: d-i speech installation not loading sof firmware

ation from this image, I don't get audio. Argh. Checking the same machine (Thinkpad T14s) with the amd64 netinst, it successfully loads firmware and starts the speech installer. This isn't new for Bookworm 12.3, is it? There has been no change in the images generated by live-build reg

Bug#1057844: bookworm live images: d-i speech installation not loading sof firmware

Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: important Tags: a11y Testing the gnome live image for the 12.3 release... Running d-i from that image complained early on about missing Intel SOF firmware. Later on, the same image finds and loads intel wifi firmware just fine. Checking on the image, all the

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Holger Wansing (2023-08-27): > So no more netinst images, And any other sections about CD, DVD, etc. must go. > but the "Other images" section will stay (netboot images, hd-media > ...)? Right, only that one stays. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)&

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

ust remove the link nevertheless? > >d-i daily builds will keep i386, so don't drop that link. Links to >debian-cd locations can go away. The lack of symmetry might require >tweaking some wml logic/definitions. So no more netinst images, but the "Other images" section will stay (netboot images, hd-media ...)? Is that correct? Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Holger Wansing (2023-08-27): > Am 27. August 2023 10:12:09 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing > : > >Hi, > > > >Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing > >: > >Ah, sorry. > >By accident I found a bug against release-notes, which documents t

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, Am 27. August 2023 10:12:09 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >Hi, > >Am 27. August 2023 08:48:20 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >Ah, sorry. >By accident I found a bug against release-notes, which documents that >i386 d-i images will be dropped for trixie. ><https:/

Re: Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/index.en.html> > >The directory is not existing. > >Is this a known issue? Ah, sorry. By accident I found a bug against release-notes, which documents that i386 d-i images will be dropped for trixie. <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Daily d-i images for i386 not being built?

Hi, I noticed that the link to the daily built netinst image for i386 is "Not found" currently: on The directory is not existing. Is this a known issue?

Re: Automating testing for the netinst and live images

Roland Clobus writes: > Hello Debian-cd Team and Phil, > > Now that the busy period for releasing Debian 12.1 is over and some of > the live images have been verified by openQA (via me), would it make > sense to think about automating the tests for the officially released >

Automating testing for the netinst and live images

Hello Debian-cd Team and Phil, Now that the busy period for releasing Debian 12.1 is over and some of the live images have been verified by openQA (via me), would it make sense to think about automating the tests for the officially released Debian images, and the weekly builds as well? My

Bug#1041500: amd64 installation images cannot install a signed 32-bit UEFI boot loader

Package: debian-cd Version: 20230607 Dear maintainer, Installation ISO images for amd64 can boot on 32-bit EFI with secure boot enabled but only install an unsigned 32-bit EFI boot loader so the installed system will be unbootable with secure boot enabled. Causes: - grub-efi-ia32

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

> >Speaking for myself: I installed from a live image on the release day of > >Debian > >12. > > OK, that explains it. Let's try to get this fixed before 12.1... > > I can see that there is already #1035382 open on the live side, let's> bump > the severity on that. > Aha, yes. Bug #1035382 seem

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

ssarily be installed on an amd64 >host. Or is this coming from live images? > >Hi Steve! > >Speaking for myself: I installed from a live image on the release day of Debian >12. OK, that explains it. Let's try to get this fixed before 12.1... I can see that there is alrea

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

> Hi Magnus, and thanks for the heads-up > > [ . . . ] > > Just because the raspi-firmware package is included on the d-i > installation media, it shouldn't necessarily be installed on an amd64 > host. Or is this coming from live images? > Hi Steve! Speaking for my

Bug#1032071: ARM firmware packages included in amd64 installation images

shouldn't necessarily be installed on an amd64 host. Or is this coming from live images? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com “Changing random stuff until your program works is bad coding practice, but if you do it fast enough it’s Machine Learning.” -- https://twitter.com/manisha72617183

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >