On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:24:04AM +0200, Peter Mann wrote:
> > Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
>
> How about "Press any key if you want boot from CD" for about 3
> seconds ???
>
> This is IMHO good function, if I forget CD media in machine with bios setting
> for boot from cd-rom firs
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 06:24:04AM +0200, Peter Mann wrote:
> > Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
>
> How about "Press any key if you want boot from CD" for about 3
> seconds ???
>
> This is IMHO good function, if I forget CD media in machine with bios setting
> for boot from cd-rom firs
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
How about "Press any key if you want boot from CD" for about 3
seconds ???
This is IMHO good function, if I forget CD media in machine with bios setting
for boot from cd-rom first - if I rea
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
How about "Press any key if you want boot from CD" for about 3
seconds ???
This is IMHO good function, if I forget CD media in machine with bios setting
for boot from cd-rom first - if I rea
Le Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan écrivait:
> BTW, I was wondering if we should also use SECURED=1 or not :-?
Well, it doesn't seem necessary to me until apt has real support for
checking the signatures. It also takes more space than needed. So leave
it out for the
Le Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan écrivait:
> BTW, I was wondering if we should also use SECURED=1 or not :-?
Well, it doesn't seem necessary to me until apt has real support for
checking the signatures. It also takes more space than needed. So leave
it out for the
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > It doesn't "fail", it's probably just not used by the scripts run on
> > gluck... Santiago could you please use exclude-sarge and
> > unexclude-CD2-sarge in the build on gluck ?
>
> I have added that on the conf and have
> It doesn't "fail", it's probably just not used by the scripts run on
> gluck... Santiago could you please use exclude-sarge and
> unexclude-CD2-sarge in the build on gluck ?
I have added that on the conf and have started rebuilding i386 cds right
now.
BTW, I was wondering if we should also use
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > It doesn't "fail", it's probably just not used by the scripts run on
> > gluck... Santiago could you please use exclude-sarge and
> > unexclude-CD2-sarge in the build on gluck ?
>
> I have added that on the conf and have
> It doesn't "fail", it's probably just not used by the scripts run on
> gluck... Santiago could you please use exclude-sarge and
> unexclude-CD2-sarge in the build on gluck ?
I have added that on the conf and have started rebuilding i386 cds right
now.
BTW, I was wondering if we should also use
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Also there are some real gems on the first CD:
> >
> > I'd be glad if you could make a real proposition (ie a patch)
> > of what to remove from CD1 and put on CD2, etc.
>
> I was thinking of exactly the same, but I first need to s
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:04:38PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Also there are some real gems on the first CD:
>
> I'd be glad if you could make a real proposition (ie a patch)
> of what to remove from CD1 and put on CD2, etc.
I was thinking of exactly the same, but I first need to set every
Le Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:40:42AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> So atlas2* gets in because it's in some scientific task package, is that
> what you're saying?
yes.
> And aterm, powershell, original-awk...? None of those
> are nearly as popular as those three things I mentioned (standard popcon
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Also there are some real gems on the first CD:
> >
> > I'd be glad if you could make a real proposition (ie a patch)
> > of what to remove from CD1 and put on CD2, etc.
>
> I was thinking of exactly the same, but I first need to s
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:04:38PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Also there are some real gems on the first CD:
>
> I'd be glad if you could make a real proposition (ie a patch)
> of what to remove from CD1 and put on CD2, etc.
I was thinking of exactly the same, but I first need to set every
Le Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:40:42AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> So atlas2* gets in because it's in some scientific task package, is that
> what you're saying?
yes.
> And aterm, powershell, original-awk...? None of those
> are nearly as popular as those three things I mentioned (standard popcon
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
> > Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
>
> It's a complex algorithm. :) Basically, just check tasks/Debian_sarge
> as a starting point.
>
> We try to incl
Le Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> Hi,
>
> I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
> Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
It's a complex algorithm. :) Basically, just check tasks/Debian_sarge
as a starting point.
We try to include on
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:40:20AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
> > Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
>
> It's a complex algorithm. :) Basically, just check tasks/Debian_sarge
> as a starting point.
>
> We try to incl
Le Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> Hi,
>
> I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
> Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
It's a complex algorithm. :) Basically, just check tasks/Debian_sarge
as a starting point.
We try to include on
Hi,
I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
I'm asking because some of the fairly popular programs that I use are
missing from it: zsh, elinks, joe -- none of these reasonably small packages
are on it, whereas there's atlas2-{ba
Hi,
I burned a sarge-i386-1.iso the other day using Jigdo from gluck.
Who/what decides what packages go onto it?
I'm asking because some of the fairly popular programs that I use are
missing from it: zsh, elinks, joe -- none of these reasonably small packages
are on it, whereas there's atlas2-{ba
22 matches
Mail list logo
