Hello,
I followed the Pseudo-image Kit v2.0 directions and
had no trouble obtaining or the rsync for binary-i386-1.iso and
binary-i386-3.iso. However I have had no success with
binary-i386-2.iso. I only get 7 warnings from make-pseudo-image and the
rsync runs through the entire file
On 24-Aug-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
>> On 24-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>> > On 23-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Being myself, a fan of double negativesdoes this mean
>> >> that the i386 CD#2 image HAS been patched ???
>
> The im
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 12:09:14AM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
(...)
> > I am either missing something, or the MD5SUMS file (refetched it, gpg
> > checked it twice) is false. Maybe the corrupt files i've heard of
> > being in image 2 have been sil
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
> On 24-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
> > On 23-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
> >>
> >> Being myself, a fan of double negativesdoes this mean
> >> that the i386 CD#2 image HAS been patched ???
The image on cdimage.d.o has been patched, but it usually
On 24-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
> On 23-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>> On 23-Aug-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>> Being myself, a fan of double negativesdoes this mean
>> that the i386 CD#2 image HAS been patched ???
>>
>
> But,
On 23-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>
> On 23-Aug-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
>>
>>> I am just trying to build the Original Debian 2.2 Rev 0 (binary i386)
> >> I am either missing something, or the MD5SUMS file (refetched it, gpg
>>> checked it
On 23-Aug-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Stephan A Suerken wrote:
>
>> I am just trying to build the Original Debian 2.2 Rev 0 (binary i386)
> I am either missing something, or the MD5SUMS file (refetched it, gpg
>> checked it twice) is false. Maybe the corrupt files i've he
r--r--1 absurd absurd 639M Aug 22 21:33 binary-i386-1_NONUS.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 absurd absurd 642M Aug 23 01:55 binary-i386-2.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 absurd absurd 502M Aug 22 22:46 binary-i386-3.iso
>
> But, when testing the images with the MD5SUM form cdim
-rw-r--r--1 absurd absurd 642M Aug 23 01:55 binary-i386-2.iso
-rw-r--r--1 absurd absurd 502M Aug 22 22:46 binary-i386-3.iso
But, when testing the images with the MD5SUM form cdimage.debian.org:
$ helsing: ~/pseudo-image-kit-2.0/2.2_i386_orig
$ absurd? md5sum -v -c ../contrib
Heikki Vatiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone please mount the CDs on a machine with a known good FTP
> > archive, and compare the CD files with those in the archive, to
> > establish the extent of the problem?
>
> I thought I would d
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please mount the CDs on a machine with a known good FTP
> archive, and compare the CD files with those in the archive, to
> establish the extent of the problem?
I thought I would do the following:
1. Mount an image over loopback
2. Calcula
Joerg Rieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Heikki,
>
> Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
>
> > Can someone verify if the file is actually corrupt, or is it just
> > the local image on trumpetti.atm.tut.fi that is incorrect.
>
> Unfortunately I can confirm that the file is also corrupt in my
> dow
> Works for me. Last rsync'd against ftp.debian.org after 2.2 was announced.
Hmm, maybe I did not express myself clearly enough, but I am not
claiming that pdksh_5.2.14-1.deb in the mirrors is corrupt. The
problem is with pdksh_5.2.14-1.deb that is in the CD ISO image
binary-i386-2.iso.
If
Quoting Heikki Vatiainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I received a report from a person that
> dists/potato/main/binary-i386/shells/pdksh_5.2.14-1.deb might be
> corrupt on binary-i386-2.iso. The ISO image matches its
The file from my local mirror installs without problems:
-r-
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 12:05:50PM +0300, Heikki Vatiainen wrote
> I received a report from a person that
> dists/potato/main/binary-i386/shells/pdksh_5.2.14-1.deb might be
> corrupt on binary-i386-2.iso. The ISO image matches its
> MD5SUM so the image should be correct. The tran
Hello Heikki,
Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> Can someone verify if the file is actually corrupt, or is it just
> the local image on trumpetti.atm.tut.fi that is incorrect.
Unfortunately I can confirm that the file is also corrupt in my
downloaded
cd-image. The iso-image itself matches its published
I received a report from a person that
dists/potato/main/binary-i386/shells/pdksh_5.2.14-1.deb might be
corrupt on binary-i386-2.iso. The ISO image matches its
MD5SUM so the image should be correct. The transcript below shows
that I can mount the image using the loopfs, but data.tar.gz
17 matches
Mail list logo
