Re: Weekly testing is same as a week ago, it seems

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:53:10AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Sorry for the breakage, and thanks for prodding. > >I've indeed worked a lot on the netinst, and it looks like I might have >broken other kinds of images in the process, my apologies. It's probably >as easy as making that “else” pa

Re: Weekly testing is same as a week ago, it seems

Hi, Daniel Lewart (2023-02-07): > Confirmed. And the 2023-02-06 builds failed too. E.g.: > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/ > > All six failed build logfiles end (prematurely) with: > read_file '.disk/base_components' - open: No such file or > directory a

Re: Weekly testing is same as a week ago, it seems

Mike, et al, > Hi all, > I did these compares... > cmp deb\ testing-2023-01-23/debian-testing-amd64-BD-1.jigdo deb\ > testing-2023-01-30/debian-testing-amd64-BD-1.jigdo > cmp deb\ testing-2023-01-23/debian-testing-source-BD-1.jigdo deb\ > testing-2023-01-30/debian-testing-source-BD-1.jigdo > cmp

Weekly testing is same as a week ago, it seems

Hi all, I did these compares... cmp deb\ testing-2023-01-23/debian-testing-amd64-BD-1.jigdo deb\ testing-2023-01-30/debian-testing-amd64-BD-1.jigdo cmp deb\ testing-2023-01-23/debian-testing-source-BD-1.jigdo deb\ testing-2023-01-30/debian-testing-source-BD-1.jigdo cmp deb\ testing-2023-01-23/d