Current patches attached here.
I was totally thrown in testing by #768788 - some of my tests on
installed EFI systems were failing, due to the broken GUID on the
ESP. Yay!
I've merged things forward and I'm ready to push these changes. Please
review one last time?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> From: Steve McIntyre
>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi
>[...]
>> --- a/src/system/efi.c
>> +++ b
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> From: Steve McIntyre
> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi
[...]
> --- a/src/system/efi.c
> +++ b/src/system/efi.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,14 @@ int di_system_is_efi(void)
> {
Hang fire - one test just failed. :-(
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Control: tag -1 +patch
>
>On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +
Control: tag -1 +patch
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Sep
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
That sounds better to me too, assu
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> That sounds better to me too, assuming we can sensibly do a question
>>> at that point. Is that allowe
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> That sounds better to me too, assuming we can sensibly do a question
>> at that point. Is that allowed? I honestly don't know... :-/
>
>While isinstallable scripts can t
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:14:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> That sounds better to me too, assuming we can sensibly do a question
> at that point. Is that allowed? I honestly don't know... :-/
While isinstallable scripts can talk to debconf, they should not ask
questions, as main-menu will ru
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:14 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:02:12PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >I was thinking more along the lines of a yes/no question which would
> >either cause partman-efi.isinstallable to fail or not. Allowing
> >selection between the "wants to conv
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:02:12PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:26:20AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > >On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:54 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:26:20AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > >> If the user wants to cont
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:26:20AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> If the user wants to continue, we could even suggest blanking the
> >> partition table
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 10:26 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> If the user wants to continue, we could even suggest blanking the
> >> partition table(s) and
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:48:11AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> If the user wants to continue, we could even suggest blanking the
>> partition table(s) and starting again with GPT, but I don't think
>> we currently
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm not 100% sure that partman-efi is the right package for the bug
> report, but it's as good as any. So, it's way past time to fix this
> particular bug. After a fair amount of playing with systems like this
> and discussing with f
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:02:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Package: partman-efi
>Version: 47
>Severity: important
>Tags: d-i
>
>Ad originally described in [1], but no bug was ever filed to
>match. #695048 is related, I think. Time to file a bug about this to
>help track work to fix it...
>
>W
Package: partman-efi
Version: 47
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Ad originally described in [1], but no bug was ever filed to
match. #695048 is related, I think. Time to file a bug about this to
help track work to fix it...
We have a machine with both UEFI and BIOS-mode boot available, with an
exis
18 matches
Mail list logo
