Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

g the extra kernel. I will check with the new daily netinst image and let you know the results as soon as possible. Hello, I tried installing Trixie using the Expert Install option with the latest daily netinst image, and I was able to select the 64K kernel right from the start of the install

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

On 2025-07-26 17:59, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 01:06:07PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 08:12:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-29): kibi@tokyo:~/debian-cd/debian-cd.git (kibi/easy)$ git diff diff --git a/tools/generat

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 01:06:07PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 08:12:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-29): >> >>kibi@tokyo:~/debian-cd/debian-cd.git (kibi/easy)$ git diff >>diff --git a/tools/generate_di+k_list b/tools/generate_di+k_li

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

Hey folks, On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 08:12:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-29): >> (Removing kernel team) >> >> On 29/05/2025 at 15:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > Trupti (2025-05-29): >> > > >> > > Add a clear installer option to select a 64KB page kernel. >> > >>

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

On 23/07/2025 at 08:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-29): AFAICS linux-image-powerpc64le-64k is not included in the DVD-1 image, so it requires a network mirror. Same with linux-image-arm64-16k. I suppose something like this might do the trick? kibi@tokyo:~/debian-cd

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

On 2025-07-22 23:02, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 22-07-2025 14:43, Trupti wrote: I upgraded my system from Bookworm to Trixie using apt full-upgrade. The system is now running Trixie, but it's still using the old Bookworm kernel (6.1.0-37-powerpc64le). Did you reboot? Can you check wha

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

Pascal Hambourg (2025-05-29): > (Removing kernel team) > > On 29/05/2025 at 15:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Trupti (2025-05-29): > > > > > > Add a clear installer option to select a 64KB page kernel. > > > > I believe this should be offered in expert mode, have you tried that? > > AFAICS li

Re: trixie release date

Hello, On 14/07/25 16:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the following dates, assumi

Re: trixie release date

Hi, For SRMs: On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze > and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties > (ftpmasters, d

Re: trixie release date

On 14 July 2025 12:35:30 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >Hi, > >trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze >and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties >(ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the fol

Re: trixie release date

Hi Emilio, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2025-07-14): > - Jul 26 > - Jul 27 Not ideal. > - Aug 2 > - Aug 3 > - Aug 9 > - Aug 10 All of those would work fine. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Cons

Re: trixie release date

On 17655 March 1977, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: - Jul 26 - Jul 27 Impossible for me. - Aug 2 - Aug 3 - Aug 9 - Aug 10 Both possible for me. -- bye, Joerg

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 02:18:05PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:09:08PM +, Andrew Cater wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> trixie is in a good shape, and we'

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:09:08PM +, Andrew Cater wrote: >On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Hi, >> >> trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze >> and preparing for the release. I&#x

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze > and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties > (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...

trixie release date

Hi, trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the following dates, assuming no show-stopppers appear: - Jul 26 - Jul 27 - Aug 2 - Aug

Re: Bug#1106757: ppc64el Trixie: Need default 64KB page kernel or installer option

installation images. Only netboot images set up a network mirror before installing the base system and offer all kernel flavours. Hi Team, I tested both the “Expert Install” workflow using the Trixie netinst ISO and the DVD installer for ppc64el. In both cases, only the 4K page-size kernel was

Bug#1107740: debian-cd: Trixie version is missing trixie information

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: eike.sa...@web.de Dear Maintainer, it seems debian-cd in the trixie version is containing valid information for bookworm, bullseye, buster, stretch and jessie - but not for trixie. I'm running simple-cdd on trixie. It fails d

Re: tasksel vs. trixie?

Paul Gevers (2025-05-28): > I think it's like this (pkgsel doesn't declare task-*desktop dependencies > AFAICT): Right, it could never express such relationships: pkgsel is a udeb, running tasksel (a deb) in /target, which lists/proposes a subset of its binaries (all debs) depending on the contex

Re: tasksel vs. trixie?

Hi, On 28-05-2025 21:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote: To be honest I've tried to answer questions as best as I could when I got asked whether dropping this or that package from the key package set would be OK, but I've never wondered how it is built. A quick look at https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_

Re: tasksel vs. trixie?

s far as I'm concerned. > > > > The remaining question is whether that's for trixie or forky. > > I'm assuming that if we were to accept this, we'd enlarge the key > package set. Let's not do that this late in the cycle. To be honest I've tried to ans

Re: tasksel vs. trixie?

Hi, On 27-05-2025 15:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I'm still ambivalent about this, and I still don't want to push in either direction. I'll just mention that reviewing, merging, and also adjusting… is all done as far as I'm concerned. The remaining question is whether that&#

Re: tasksel vs. trixie?

ppy to get that reviewed, merged, and uploaded. I'm still ambivalent about this, and I still don't want to push in either direction. I'll just mention that reviewing, merging, and also adjusting… is all done as far as I'm concerned. The remaining question is whether that

Re: Bug#1102140: CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Testing/Trixie

wed and ACKed by the images team > >The proposed change does not affect the logic related with ISO image types >though. It only adds an alternative condition to disable cdrom sources after >the installation if the installation media is not a real optical disc, e.g. a >USB flash dri

tasksel vs. trixie?

Hi, Sorry to bother you again with such a question. This should be the last of them, as I went through all the wishlist items (set up to track d-i trixie things) people have been gathering lately. We've had people prepare tasksel merge requests for two new desktop environments, Lomiri and

Re: Bug#1102140: CD-ROM is still first priority package repository in Testing/Trixie

l disc, e.g. a USB flash drive so that apt does not choke on it. [1] <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Trixie/Wishlist>

Re: Fix for d-i in the trixie live images

the 2025-03-03 weekly images from [1]), the installer >does not work, and complains that it cannot find kernel modules. > >Since trixie is not in freeze yet, the MR [2] will revert my previous change, >and then the installer will work again from the live images. ACK, merged already!

Fix for d-i in the trixie live images

it cannot find kernel modules. Since trixie is not in freeze yet, the MR [2] will revert my previous change, and then the installer will work again from the live images. You can see the latest openQA results at [3]. With kind regards, Roland Clobus [1] https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live

Bug#1060903: marked as done (Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:16:02 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545 has caused the Debian Bug report #1060903, regarding Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

gt;> Severity: important > >> > >> Dear Maintainer, > >> > >> testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter > > > >installation > > > >> phase. > >> > >> Bookworm ISO images have no prob

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

Hi Phil, On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:46:44AM +, Phil Wyett wrote: >Package: debian-cd >Version: 3.2.1 >Severity: important > >Dear Maintainer, > >testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter >installation >phase. > >Bookworm IS

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

Hi Daniel, On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 12:52:35PM +0100, Daniel Quitt wrote: >On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:46:44 + Phil Wyett >wrote: >> Package: debian-cd >> Version: 3.2.1 >> Severity: important >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> testing/trixie or greater

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:46:44 + Phil Wyett wrote: > Package: debian-cd > Version: 3.2.1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter installation > phase. > > Bookworm ISO i

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi, Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:44:27 +0100): > In a perfect world, all boot loaders would support /boot on ext4 and we > would not have to make trade-offs. Indeed we must make a trade-off > between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem > vs small sep

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:12 PM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 13/01/2025 at 14:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> > >> AFAIK the only implementation of Petitboot on arm64 (Odroid) supports > >> ext4 so there is no need to rollback to ex

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On 13/01/2025 at 14:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: AFAIK the only implementation of Petitboot on arm64 (Odroid) supports ext4 so there is no need to rollback to ext2. I did not mean to roll back to ext2 but to create a separate /boot parti

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 13/01/2025 at 07:48, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Am 12. Januar 2025 23:44:27 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg > > : > >> Indeed we must make a trade-off > >> between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem > >> vs

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hello, I try generated installation with ext4 /boot in a more modern ppc64el (Raptor CS Blackbird with Petitboot 0ef84c0 (POWER9)) and it can see and boot the generated installation. So seems only POWER8 Tyan systems that are unable to boot on ext4, It seems they (Tyan) stop making POWER soon aft

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hello, On Sun, 2025-01-12 at 14:13 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 12/01/2025 at 11:53, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): > > > oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com > > > (2025-01-12): > > > > Hello, > &g

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On 13/01/2025 at 07:48, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 12. Januar 2025 23:44:27 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : Indeed we must make a trade-off between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem vs small separate /boot) and compatibility with boot loaders. And I believe we can d

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi, Am 12. Januar 2025 23:44:27 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : >In a perfect world, all boot loaders would support /boot on ext4 and we would >not have to make trade-offs. Indeed we must make a trade-off between >robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem vs small >separat

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On 12/01/2025 at 19:43, Holger Wansing wrote: Am 12. Januar 2025 19:17:19 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : On 12/01/2025 at 16:29, Holger Wansing wrote: Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:13:21 +0100): I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware that the revert fixes only this specif

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi again, Am 12. Januar 2025 19:17:19 MEZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : >On 12/01/2025 at 16:29, Holger Wansing wrote: >> Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:13:21 >> +0100): >>> >>> I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware that the revert fixes >>> only this specific use case (guided p

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:17:19PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 12/01/2025 at 16:29, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:13:21 > > +0100): > > > > > > I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware that the revert fixes > > > only this specific use case (guid

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On 12/01/2025 at 16:29, Holger Wansing wrote: Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:13:21 +0100): I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware that the revert fixes only this specific use case (guided partitioning using LVM with or without encryption). The issue already existed and remai

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

ote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): > >>>> oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com > >>>> (2025-01-12): > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> installing Trixie Alpha 1 on Tyan TN71-BP012 (POWER8) > >>>>> (/images/trixie_di_alpha

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

On 12/01/2025 at 14:51, Holger Wansing wrote: Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:13:40 +0100): On 12/01/2025 at 11:53, Holger Wansing wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com (2025-01-12): Hello, installing Trixie Alpha 1 on

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi, Pascal Hambourg wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:13:40 +0100): > Hello, > > On 12/01/2025 at 11:53, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): > >> oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com (2025-01-12): > >>> Hello, > >

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hello, On 12/01/2025 at 11:53, Holger Wansing wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com (2025-01-12): Hello, installing Trixie Alpha 1 on Tyan TN71-BP012 (POWER8) (/images/trixie_di_alpha1/ppc64el 2024/12/31) Installation goes well but

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi Cyril, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:21:08 +0100): > oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com (2025-01-12): > > Hello, > > installing Trixie Alpha 1 on Tyan TN71-BP012 (POWER8) > > (/images/trixie_di_alpha1/ppc64el 2024/12/31) > > > > Installation goe

Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hi, oliviosu_ppc6...@tutanota.com (2025-01-12): > Hello, > installing Trixie Alpha 1 on Tyan TN71-BP012 (POWER8) > (/images/trixie_di_alpha1/ppc64el 2024/12/31) > > Installation goes well but installed system isn't bootable with Petitboot. > Installation was made choosing

ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

Hello, installing Trixie Alpha 1 on Tyan TN71-BP012 (POWER8) (/images/trixie_di_alpha1/ppc64el 2024/12/31) Installation goes well but installed system isn't bootable with Petitboot. Installation was made choosing automated partitioning for an entrier disk with LVM and luks. Doing

Re: Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

Hi, Am 28. Dezember 2024 11:12:55 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : > >Looking at riscv64, it seems to have become an official release arch a >little while back[1]. Its images tarball features netboot stuff (hence >this question regarding d-i-n-i[2]), but also cdrom things: Maybe riscv64 people can a

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): > Seeing how (at least these past few days, weeks, months, or so) udebs > have piled up in the archive, it's probably more a matter of making sure > to include the right set of udebs onto the image, instead of picking > whatever is the latest. > > From a cursory look

Re: Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

Hi, On 2024-12-28 11:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hello images team, > > This just happened: > > Copying installer version 20241227 from unstable to testing > > Will copy installer version 20241227 from suite unstable to > testing. > Architectures to copy: amd64, ppc64el, s390x,

Building Trixie Alpha 1 images

27;ve cc'd Aurélien again, just in case…) 1. https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/commit/593e01d703966ba8602eeff7594b0553900ea84f 2. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00218.html I'll look into the website next, checking whether it got prepared for tri

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): >> The problem on the debian-cd side is different. It uses a d-i daily >> build that it has no control over, which might need matching udebs >> that bad luck went away between the d-i build and the debian-cd one. > > Seeing how (at least th

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): > The problem on the debian-cd side is different. It uses a d-i daily > build that it has no control over, which might need matching udebs > that bad luck went away between the d-i build and the debian-cd one. Seeing how (at least these past few days, weeks, months,

Re: Trixie

Philip Hands (2024-12-25): > We could just make a similar check in debian-cd, and bail-out when the > configured ABI does not match the available one. > > That would at least reduce the chances that people get to download > images that are bound to fail. I mentioned having a check on this earlie

Re: Trixie

Philip Hands writes: > I know that it is possible to detect that we have kernel version skew at > image build time, because I have code in branch2repo that detects this > and then proceeds to build a working mini-ISO image regardless. I actually got the details wrong there. It is correct that t

Re: Trixie

Hans Eisenrieder writes: > Dear team, > > The firmware: > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso > repeatedly asks whether the operating system should be installed without a > kernel. Are you talking about this screen? h

Trixie

Dear team, The firmware: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso repeatedly asks whether the operating system should be installed without a kernel. With kind regards Hans Eisenrieder -- Im Auge des Betrachters www.foto-in.d

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

Hello Steve, On 03/11/2024 22:56, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Roland Clobus wrote: On 03/11/2024 17:58, Steve McIntyre wrote: When merged, please consider activating Debian Junior in the follow-up MR [4]. ... Let's find out then - merged now. :-) It wo

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

ready? > >It should be (I had marked it draft, because it needed the previous MR), >however I'm not sure if the change in trixie/Makefile.weekly will work, as >I'm not able to test that properly. Let's find out then - merged now. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

needed the previous MR), however I'm not sure if the change in trixie/Makefile.weekly will work, as I'm not able to test that properly. With kind regards, Roland [1] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/merge_requests/360 [2] https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-b

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

Hey Roland! On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 04:46:59PM +0100, Roland Clobus wrote:> > >It is now more than 2 months later. Since then, the MR than enables the build >for Debian Junior has been merged [1]. >I've received a private mail from Stefan to request some form of an automated >build. >Even if the i

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

ebian Junior" to the live-images? @Stefan, I assume you mean the weekly images that are published on https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ and are based on Trixie? Correct. ... [snip] ... ... do you need the images to be generated on a weekly basis? No, fr

Re: Updates to the trixie freeze policy

Hi, Sebastian Ramacher (2024-11-02): > Dear toolchain, debian-installer, and image maintainers, > > We, as the release team, are aware that we are late with the > announcement of the freeze timeline for trixie. After some internal > discussions on how we want to handle the fr

Updates to the trixie freeze policy

Dear toolchain, debian-installer, and image maintainers, We, as the release team, are aware that we are late with the announcement of the freeze timeline for trixie. After some internal discussions on how we want to handle the freeze for trixie based on the lessons learnt from the bookworm

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

llo Roland, @Stefan, I assume you mean the weekly images that are published on https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ and are based on Trixie? Correct. About 6 months ago I created a branch in live-build. Now I made it more visible as a MR [1], and it can be integrated i

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

you mean the weekly images that are published on > https://get.debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ > and are based on Trixie? Correct. > About 6 months ago I created a branch in live-build. Now I made it more > visible as a MR [1], and it can be integrated in the live

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

debian.org/images/weekly-live-builds/amd64/iso-hybrid/ and are based on Trixie? About 6 months ago I created a branch in live-build. Now I made it more visible as a MR [1], and it can be integrated in the live-setup and images-team/setup repositories. When that is done, they will be re-generated

Re: Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

or possibly via the mailing list at debian-l...@lists.debian.org Follow up set to debian-l...@lists.debian.org Hope this helps - with every good wish, as ever, Andy Cater (amaca...@debian.org) > When I understood well, the live images can be build based on the > live-tasks package. >

Live-Image for Debian Junior (trixie)

d based on the live-tasks package. [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/trixie/live-tasks [2] https://packages.debian.org/trixie/live-task-debian-junior [3] https://packages.debian.org/trixie/junior-desktop Thanks -- Stefan Diese E-Mail wurde von einem Debian GNU/Linux System gesendet

Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.2.1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter installation phase. Bookworm ISO images have no problems and are successful. System dmidecode data: # dmidecode 3.4 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs

Bug#1057073: debian-cd: adapt script to match the new release-notes situation for trixie

Package: debian-cd Tags: patch For trixie we have some changings regarding the release-notes: They have been migrated from Docbook to reStructedText / Sphinx [1]. During this migration, it has been decided to no longer build separate versions per architecture, but only one generic variant

Re: i386 in Debian 13 Trixie

. As a project Debian still supports i386, and will continue to provide updates via the usual apt repositories. This will continue throughout the Trixie life-cycle. There is a rapidly vanishingly small number of people who actually need a new installation on the i386 platform. Most users s

i386 in Debian 13 Trixie

Greetings People!! Seems in the testing cd-s, I dont see i386 at all anymore. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ I tried web searches to find out the status of debian and i386.  But I couldnt find any information.  Maybe its due to the deterioration of some search engines. Is th