On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> >
> > > One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> > > simple repoint away from actual release would be
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> >
> > > One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> > > simple repoint away from actual release would be
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
>
> > One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> > simple repoint away from actual release would be to have a similar setup
> > in the debian-cd dir as t
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
>
> > One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> > simple repoint away from actual release would be to have a similar setup
> > in the debian-cd dir as t
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> simple repoint away from actual release would be to have a similar setup
> in the debian-cd dir as the main archive:
>
> debian-cd/
> woody/
> sarge/
> stable -> woody
>
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> One suggestion for being able to have testing images that are just a
> simple repoint away from actual release would be to have a similar setup
> in the debian-cd dir as the main archive:
>
> debian-cd/
> woody/
> sarge/
> stable -> woody
>
We just had a little talk/workshop/discussion regarding the iso mirroring
situation. Some thoughts and ideas:
Most people liked the long filenames (debian-30r1-alpha-binary-1.iso)
better, so lets go with this even if it makes the rsync hardlink tricks a
bit more tricky. Any objections?
One
We just had a little talk/workshop/discussion regarding the iso mirroring
situation. Some thoughts and ideas:
Most people liked the long filenames (debian-30r1-alpha-binary-1.iso)
better, so lets go with this even if it makes the rsync hardlink tricks a
bit more tricky. Any objections?
One
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:41:08AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
> about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only manty
> helped me debug it this night), and I'd welcome other results to be sure
> it's ok.
BTW
- Original Message -
From: "Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Call for test and some thoughts
> I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
> about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only
manty
> helpe
Hi people,
I commited today some changes to debian-cd wrt the latest bug
about Packages and Release(.gpg) files. I haven't tested it much (only manty
helped me debug it this night), and I'd welcome other results to be sure
it's ok.
I also made a change to work with the latest boot floppies where
11 matches
Mail list logo