Re: trixie release date

Hello, On 14/07/25 16:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Hi, trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the following dates, assuming no show-stoppp

Re: trixie release date

Hi, For SRMs: On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze > and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties > (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the foll

Re: trixie release date

On 14 July 2025 12:35:30 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >Hi, > >trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze >and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties >(ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the following dates, assuming no >sh

Re: trixie release date

Hi Emilio, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2025-07-14): > - Jul 26 > - Jul 27 Not ideal. > - Aug 2 > - Aug 3 > - Aug 9 > - Aug 10 All of those would work fine. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Cons

Re: trixie release date

On 17655 March 1977, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: - Jul 26 - Jul 27 Impossible for me. - Aug 2 - Aug 3 - Aug 9 - Aug 10 Both possible for me. -- bye, Joerg

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 02:18:05PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:09:08PM +, Andrew Cater wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:09:08PM +, Andrew Cater wrote: >On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Hi, >> >> trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze >> and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved par

Re: trixie release date

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 12:35:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > trixie is in a good shape, and we're looking into moving to the full freeze > and preparing for the release. I'd like to hear input from involved parties > (ftpmasters, d-i, cd, press...) for the following dates, ass

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): > Seeing how (at least these past few days, weeks, months, or so) udebs > have piled up in the archive, it's probably more a matter of making sure > to include the right set of udebs onto the image, instead of picking > whatever is the latest. > > From a cursory look

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): >> The problem on the debian-cd side is different. It uses a d-i daily >> build that it has no control over, which might need matching udebs >> that bad luck went away between the d-i build and the debian-cd one. > > Seeing how (at least th

Re: Trixie

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26): > The problem on the debian-cd side is different. It uses a d-i daily > build that it has no control over, which might need matching udebs > that bad luck went away between the d-i build and the debian-cd one. Seeing how (at least these past few days, weeks, months,

Re: Trixie

Philip Hands (2024-12-25): > We could just make a similar check in debian-cd, and bail-out when the > configured ABI does not match the available one. > > That would at least reduce the chances that people get to download > images that are bound to fail. I mentioned having a check on this earlie

Re: Trixie

Philip Hands writes: > I know that it is possible to detect that we have kernel version skew at > image build time, because I have code in branch2repo that detects this > and then proceeds to build a working mini-ISO image regardless. I actually got the details wrong there. It is correct that t

Re: Trixie

Hans Eisenrieder writes: > Dear team, > > The firmware: > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso > repeatedly asks whether the operating system should be installed without a > kernel. Are you talking about this screen? h