On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hello,
>
>tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
>prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
>explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
>
>That's why I'm going to
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 21:10 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default)
> > system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86
> >
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default)
> > system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86
> > arch (i386 or
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default)
> system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86
> arch (i386 or amd64) and the running processor is either Intel
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
> prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
> explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
>
> That's why I'm goi
Quoting Daniel Hartwig (mand...@gmail.com):
> Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
> (following the same change in tasksel)? There is already a patch
> committed. I'll give this more of a test this week with some induced
> errors during the installation.
I hesitated
On 10 September 2012 06:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If anybody wants to see something land into this release, it would be
> nice to mention it now instead of after the end of the merge window.
Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
(following the same change in tasksel)
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
> If anybody wan
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 00:07:46 +0200, a écrit :
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
