On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 10:08:20AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
> > That's not ideal - maybe it would be better to use the same name
> > stem as for the iso files, e.g. "debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.jigdo"?
>
> i actually think the iso filename is too long/descriptive given the
> location anyway, e.g
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the current naming scheme for .jigdo files will make it
> impossible for users to tell whether they're downloading 3.0r0 or
> 3.0r1 unless they actually download the .jigdo file and let jigdo-lite
> print the .iso name.
>
> Th
2 matches
Mail list logo
