Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:58:27PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre (2014-08-19): >> or do we split things even more? That menu is already too long, and >> causes scrolling for people to see the lower options (if they realise >> such a thing is possible!). How about we split things up

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steve McIntyre (2014-08-19): > or do we split things even more? That menu is already too long, and > causes scrolling for people to see the lower options (if they realise > such a thing is possible!). How about we split things up some more, > assuming we can get the auto-detect to work: > > #if (

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:17:02AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >[ Adding -accessibility@ and -cd@ to the loop. ] > >Steve McIntyre (2014-08-17): >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> >Control: tag -1 confirmed >> >> Another issue is that it requires much more mem

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:02:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Now, the ideal would be to use syslinux' ifcpu/ifcpu64 c32 modules to >> determine the menu order depending on the machine (see [0]): no "64 bit" >> option on 32 bit machines, "hidden or down the menu" "32

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Joey Hess
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Now, the ideal would be to use syslinux' ifcpu/ifcpu64 c32 modules to > determine the menu order depending on the machine (see [0]): no "64 bit" > option on 32 bit machines, "hidden or down the menu" "32 bit" option on > 64 bit-capable machines. This used to be the

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-08-19): > While I don't have a definitive opinion on the ordering of the menu > choices, I definitively think amd64 should be picked by default on amd64 > architectures. Especially since multiarch, there's no good reason left > for installing i386 on amd64-capable mac

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-18 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hoy, Le mardi, 19 août 2014, 01.17:02 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > The default is "Install" right now, which installs i386. The topic of > this bug report is switching to "Graphical install" by default, but > shouldn't we also promote amd64 by default while we're at it? This > would mean having "64

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 19 Aug 2014 01:17:02 +0200, a écrit : > => debian-accessibility@: if we go from i386 to amd64 by default, is >there anything that needs to be done on your side (doc update etc.) Normally, only the installer manual would need an update. I don't see the multi-arch boot me

Re: Bug#485586: debian-installer: Default to graphical install

2014-08-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
[ Adding -accessibility@ and -cd@ to the loop. ] Steve McIntyre (2014-08-17): > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Control: tag -1 confirmed > >> Another issue is that it requires much more memory, but that IMO is not a > >> blocker. It does require careful docum