On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:27:36PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:25:57PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> Or are you talking about keeping the snapshot trees around even longer?
>
>Yes, but only in the sense that there must be an overlap of at least a few
>days during
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:25:57PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hmmm. There is already a snapshot tree generated when the images are
> made each week, and the jigdos point to that. Is that not sufficient?
Not for people who start downloading immediately before new jigdos are made
available: The
[ Apologies for diving into the discussion late ]
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 06:55:45PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 02:44:26AM +1000, Robert Parker wrote:
>> It's basically pointless.
>
>No, IMHO it would be a very good idea indeed! ;-7
>
>That's because *I* get all the hat
On Sunday 24 October 2004 21:03, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> El Domingo, 24 de Octubre de 2004 12:26, George Danchev escribió:
> > 3) There is nothing to solve here ;-) We have already have all these
> > 'dropped from the debian archive files' on the snapshot.debian.net server
> > ... an the
Humm,
of course the url should be
http://snapshot.debian.net/archive//MM/DD/debian/
>
> Aaarg!, I didn't know that, (I said in my first mail I'm new in Debian).
>
> Well, so your sugestion about an adversiting note when a file is not found
> have more sense. Jigdo should say to user the los
El Domingo, 24 de Octubre de 2004 12:26, George Danchev escribió:
> 3) There is nothing to solve here ;-) We have already have all these
> 'dropped from the debian archive files' on the snapshot.debian.net server
> ... an the users will need just some files to complete the CD, they will
> not downl
On Sunday 24 October 2004 11:51, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> El Domingo, 24 de Octubre de 2004 09:22, George Danchev escribió:
> > Since
> > it is very hard to stipulate (as well as to complete) for all
> > .jidgo/.template producers: 'hey you producers, keep your
> > last_week_purged_packag
El Domingo, 24 de Octubre de 2004 09:22, George Danchev escribió:
> Since
> it is very hard to stipulate (as well as to complete) for all
> .jidgo/.template producers: 'hey you producers, keep your
> last_week_purged_packages directory or the like' ,
IMHO, perhaphs is no so hard. We even have to a
On Saturday 23 October 2004 19:55, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 02:44:26AM +1000, Robert Parker wrote:
> > It's basically pointless.
>
> No, IMHO it would be a very good idea indeed! ;-7
>
> That's because *I* get all the hate mail from people who think that jigdo
> is buggy, fu
El Domingo, 24 de Octubre de 2004 02:28, Robert Parker escribió:
> On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:06, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> > El Sábado, 23 de Octubre de 2004 18:44, Robert Parker escribió:
> > > It's basically pointless. The *iso.tmp can be renamed and then loop
> > > mounted and used a
On Sunday 24 October 2004 02:55, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 02:44:26AM +1000, Robert Parker wrote:
> > It's basically pointless.
>
> No, IMHO it would be a very good idea indeed! ;-7
>
> That's because *I* get all the hate mail from people who think that jigdo
> is buggy, fund
On Sunday 24 October 2004 03:06, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> El Sábado, 23 de Octubre de 2004 18:44, Robert Parker escribió:
>
> > It's basically pointless. The *iso.tmp can be renamed and then loop
> > mounted and used as the input to another round of jigdo-lite using the
> > newer *.jigdo
El Sábado, 23 de Octubre de 2004 18:44, Robert Parker escribió:
> On Saturday 23 October 2004 19:32, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Sorry if I'm reinventing the wheel. I'm new in Debian and using jigdo.
> >
> > My suggestion/question is: why there is not a pool directory like
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 02:44:26AM +1000, Robert Parker wrote:
> It's basically pointless.
No, IMHO it would be a very good idea indeed! ;-7
That's because *I* get all the hate mail from people who think that jigdo
is buggy, fundamentally broken etc etc... ;-|
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| R
On Saturday 23 October 2004 19:32, Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry if I'm reinventing the wheel. I'm new in Debian and using jigdo.
>
> My suggestion/question is: why there is not a pool directory like
> 'last_week_purged_packages' and jigdo is enabled to search in it?. If a
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
