On Mon, 7 May 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Philip Charles am Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:26:07PM +:
> > I have just used up the last of a batch of 700 MB discs and I will not be
> > using them again.
>
> Uhm - how do you "measure" the quality of a CDR? I'm also a small vendor,
> and
On Mon 07 May, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Philip Charles am Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:26:07PM +:
> > I have just used up the last of a batch of 700 MB discs and I will not be
> > using them again.
>
> Uhm - how do you "measure" the quality of a CDR? I'm also a small vendor,
> and use c
So sprach Philip Charles am Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:26:07PM +:
> I have just used up the last of a batch of 700 MB discs and I will not be
> using them again.
Uhm - how do you "measure" the quality of a CDR? I'm also a small vendor,
and use cheap (? <1,- DM (USD 0,45)) 700 MB CDR's - upto no
On Mon, 7 May 2001, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> Few people are aware that many of "our" old machines have ended up in
> developing countries, esp. through the many partnerships that schools/
> universities have with similar institutions there. From what I've heard, Linux
> is quite popular there, becau
On 26 Apr 2001, Philip Hands wrote:
> Bernd Hentig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm only aware that the new CD-R 90/99 may pose some problems on
> > modern drives and that the CD-R 144/200 need a BIOS or even laser
> > upgrade to be read successfully. Maybe it's time for a Debian DVD
> > ;-
On 26 Apr 2001, Mark Eichin wrote:
> I'd agree with keeping the "standard" limit (though if the automation
> eventually got to the point where you could just feed it a "media
> size" paramater, that would rock for building zip, jaz, orb, 700M-cd,
> flash-card, or other install images.
There are
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Bernd Hentig wrote:
>
> Well, nowadays 700 MB CD-R are even cheaper than 650 MB, so I really
> don't mind. Is there any *real* reason why the 650 MB limit is still kept ?
> I mean, 700 MB CD-R can be read by all modern CDROM drives except 1x/2x
> proprietary drives from abo
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Stefano wrote:
> it seems that the debian 2.2rev3 is coming out now.
> I am looking with
> rsync -avH rsync://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd
did something happen to cdimage since ? i'm trying to
rsync for our debian cd mirror here and it simply
times out on rsync - i can't co
Hi
it seems that the debian 2.2rev3 is coming out now.
I am looking with
rsync -avH rsync://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd
I am copyng the images in my mirror.
rsync -avH rsync://aurolinux.mit.edu/
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Philip Charles am Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:51:40PM +:
> > Burn the DVDs from the file system using a mkhybrid | cdrecord pipe?
>
> Uhm, why not first write it to disk?
Now that there does not seem to be a file size limit, it saves HDD s
So sprach Philip Charles am Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 10:51:40PM +:
> Burn the DVDs from the file system using a mkhybrid | cdrecord pipe?
Uhm, why not first write it to disk?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://ww
On 26 Apr 2001, Philip Hands wrote:
> Apparently making DVDs poses interesting problems because of the 2GB
> file size limit. I hear there is a solution, but didn't find out what
> it was.
>
Burn the DVDs from the file system using a mkhybrid | cdrecord pipe?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Pa
www.compgeeks.com; look under "systems" in the sidebar...
http://www.compgeeks.com/details.asp?invtid=GEN603
$284, though it has a winmodem (which I pulled, and installed a $9
asound ethernet card from elsewhere on compgeeks)
(I have no connection with compgeeks - I've just bought a half dozen
s
I'd agree with keeping the "standard" limit (though if the automation
eventually got to the point where you could just feed it a "media
size" paramater, that would rock for building zip, jaz, orb, 700M-cd,
flash-card, or other install images. But it would *merely* be cool -
I don't think there's
Very good. I need pointers to buy such machines in Canada and the US,
Thanks,
AR
> ps. 1500US for a brand new machine? bah. I tend to buy 6-month-stale
> machines on compgeeks, so $350 for a decent (600mhz or greater,
> 10g/64M) mini tower without monitor - pop in a debian cd, instant
> server
Hello,
> Apparently making DVDs poses interesting problems because of the 2GB
> file size limit. I hear there is a solution, but didn't find out what
> it was.
Debian's FreeBSD port? >;-)
--
Attila Nagy
So sprach Philip Hands am Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:32:58PM +0100:
> Apparently making DVDs poses interesting problems because of the 2GB
> file size limit. I hear there is a solution, but didn't find out what
> it was.
IIRC, the 2 GB limit has vanished with glibc 2.2.2 on both ext2 and reiserfs
w
On 26 Apr 2001, Philip Hands wrote:
>
>I've no idea, but I'd guess that there might be a problem pressing
>larger CDs in bulk --- would someone that actually presses CDs in bulk
>care to enlighten us?
>
>As it happens, we can fit the CDs onto 3x650 per architecture at
>present, so we might as well
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What do people think about this? This matches the (slightly broken)
> > state of the main archive at present, so either I kludge debian-cd
> > to exclude bulkmail, or we wait (and wait?) for the archive to
Bernd Hentig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You'll be pleased to hear that I gave open.hands.com (a.k.a
> > cdimage.debian.org) a brain transplant today, so instead of being an
> > Athlon on a VIA chipset motherboard, it's now a PIII 750, on an Intel
> > chipset, with 512
Hello
> Hi,
>
> You'll be pleased to hear that I gave open.hands.com (a.k.a
> cdimage.debian.org) a brain transplant today, so instead of being an
> Athlon on a VIA chipset motherboard, it's now a PIII 750, on an Intel
> chipset, with 512MB of new RAM
That means you have *downgraded* the system
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What do people think about this? This matches the (slightly broken)
> state of the main archive at present, so either I kludge debian-cd
> to exclude bulkmail, or we wait (and wait?) for the archive to be
> fixed.
As I (IIRC) said on IRC, I'd suggest y
22 matches
Mail list logo
