Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good idea!
>
> Disk #4 will now have the udma66 kernel loaded onto it.
> (debian-cd CVS has been updated)
>
> So for i386/potato/woody the boot kernels are:
>
> CD#1: default kernel from boot-disks(i386)
> CD#2: compact
> CD#3: idepc
> CD#4: udma66
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I looked at El Torito a few years ago in this regard. It allows you to
> have a choice of which floppy image gets booted so there is no space
> problem. The first problem I saw at that time was a lack of support for
> this feature in mkisofs. That might be solved now
[Please trim X-Postings as appropriate when replying]
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:53:25PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> According to debian-cd/tools/boot/potato/boot-*:
[snip]
> Arm: not bootable at all since supported computers don't have CD drives.
Erm, actually that's not quite correct, maybe t
, the diskemu.bin booter can default
to the mainline boot kernel.
--
Dean Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
94TT :)
-Original Message-
Subject: RE: regarding potato images
Gary's system works by booting diskemu.bin as a floppy image. That then
scans th
On 7 Jan 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> It would help if someone could inform me of what kernels are on what
> CDs for other arches, if there are any, on other arches.
According to debian-cd/tools/boot/potato/boot-*:
Alpha: only CD 1 is bootable, with something that seems like a multi-boot
thing
ED],
> Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: regarding potato images
> Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 01:20:19 -0500
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On 11-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
On 11-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Forgive my ignorance, but I just had to de-lurk to ask this probably silly
>> question:
>> Can't you have multiple kernel images on the same cd, chosen via lilo (or
>> whatever boot loader is being used) just
Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Forgive my ignorance, but I just had to de-lurk to ask this probably silly
> question:
> Can't you have multiple kernel images on the same cd, chosen via lilo (or
> whatever boot loader is being used) just like when you have mulitple kernel
> versio
On Sunday 07 January 2001 14:29, Jim Westveer wrote:
> Disk #4 will now have the udma66 kernel loaded onto it.
> (debian-cd CVS has been updated)
>
> So for i386/potato/woody the boot kernels are:
>
> CD#1: default kernel from boot-disks(i386)
> CD#2: compact
> CD#3: idepc
> CD#4: udma66
> CD#n: d
L PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
94TT :)
-Original Message-
From: Adam Di Carlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 5:05 PM
To: Carpenter, Dean
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: regarding potato images
"Carpenter, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
"Carpenter, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You may want to consider doing a multiple boot image scenario for the CDs.
> That is, boot a menu that allows a choice of boot kernels to use.
Well, if we wanted this, we should use grub, rather than writing a
debian-only version.
I hate debian-
A. Bezemer
Cc: Jim Westveer; bbennet; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: regarding potato images
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jim Westveer wrote:
> > The debian-cd now in CVS will put boot blocks on
> > ALL i386 disk
On 07-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> "J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jim Westveer wrote:
>> Okay. Boot team: be sure to post a note to -cd as soon as you think of other
>> interesting flavours ;-)
>
> Well, there's the udma66 flavor, which is just a vanill
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jim Westveer wrote:
> > The debian-cd now in CVS will put boot blocks on
> > ALL i386 disks in the following fashion.
> >
> > CD#1: default kernel from boot-disks(i386)
> > CD#2: compact
> > CD#3: idepc
> > CD#n: default ke
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jim Westveer wrote:
> On 02-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
> >> >
> >> > CD#1: vanilla kernel
> >> > CD#2: compact
> >> > CD#3: idepci
On 02-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
>> >
>> > CD#1: vanilla kernel
>> > CD#2: compact
>> > CD#3: idepci
>
> Yes, I agree.
The debian-cd now in CVS will put bo
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Um, I thought it went like this for i386:
> >
> > CD#1: vanilla kernel
> > CD#2: compact
> > CD#3: idepci
>
> #1 & #2 correct, for potato, i386, CD#3 has no boot blocks.
> It (CD#3) probably should be modified
On 01-Jan-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> bbennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Bootable? Is the B3 supposed to be bootable?
>>
>> It passed the md5sum test and it is the official image.
>>
>> If it is supposed to be bootable, let me know.
>> This is the first I have heard of this.
>
> Um, I
bbennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello to adam. Good to hear from you.
> I hope you have a happy New Year.
>
> Bootable? Is the B3 supposed to be bootable?
>
> It passed the md5sum test and it is the official image.
>
> I guess the cdimage folks will know.
>
> If it is supposed to be bo
19 matches
Mail list logo
