RE: Outdated woody-i386.list file

> -Original Message- > From: Richard Atterer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:04 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: Outdated woody-i386.list file > > > 4). There seems to me that there is a problem with using

Re: Outdated woody-i386.list file

Hi, On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Simon Wood wrote: > I was typing up a long, rambling email about P-I-K but I'll > spare you all and just post the conclusions that I came to. I got equally fed up with the PIK last December, and have been working on a replacement since then. Maybe yo

RE: Outdated woody-i386.list file

Hello all, I was typing up a long, rambling email about P-I-K but I'll spare you all and just post the conclusions that I came to. 1). I think that the '.list' and ISO's should contain either a revision number (for Official releases) or a date stamp (for the testing/unstable 'releases'). This wou