On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 10:08:20AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
> > That's not ideal - maybe it would be better to use the same name
> > stem as for the iso files, e.g. "debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.jigdo"?
>
> i actually think the iso filename is too long/descriptive given the
> location anyway, e.g
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the current naming scheme for .jigdo files will make it
> impossible for users to tell whether they're downloading 3.0r0 or
> 3.0r1 unless they actually download the .jigdo file and let jigdo-lite
> print the .iso name.
>
> Th
Hi,
I noticed that the current naming scheme for .jigdo files will make it
impossible for users to tell whether they're downloading 3.0r0 or
3.0r1 unless they actually download the .jigdo file and let jigdo-lite
print the .iso name.
That's not ideal - maybe it would be better to use the same nam
3 matches
Mail list logo
