Hi,
I've recently launched a new mirror in Belgium for the ISO images of Debian
(debian-cd). I would like for it to be added to the list if possible and no
objections.
Site: https://debian.teambelgium.net/
Thank you
Yours truly
hi,
the link Brazil: debian.pop-sc.rnp.br: HTTP
is broken.
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:16:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1060903: Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on
Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) Dell Inspiron 1545
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060903,
regarding Debian testing/trixie ISO fail to boot on Intel Core 2
gt;> Severity: important
> >>
> >> Dear Maintainer,
> >>
> >> testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter
> >
> >installation
> >
> >> phase.
> >>
> >> Bookworm ISO images have no prob
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:46:44AM +, Phil Wyett wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>Version: 3.2.1
>Severity: important
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter
>installation
>phase.
>
>Bookworm IS
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 12:52:35PM +0100, Daniel Quitt wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:46:44 + Phil Wyett
>wrote:
>> Package: debian-cd
>> Version: 3.2.1
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> testing/trixie or greater
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:46:44 + Phil Wyett
wrote:
> Package: debian-cd
> Version: 3.2.1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter
installation
> phase.
>
> Bookworm ISO i
Looping the list back in.
David Touzeau (2025-01-21):
> Thanks for your reply, but the problem is not the presence of kernel
> 6.1.0-29 but of 6.1.0-30.
> The tool considers that 6.1.0-30 should be used to build the ISO image.
My very first words were:
It looks to me the tooling
David Touzeau (2025-01-20):
> We build ISO with simple-cdd but all iso created are failed since
> 6.1.0-30 was included inside repositories.
>
> The cause is the current kernel initrd.gz still include kernel
> 6.1.0-29 as the repository provides the 6.1.0-30 and build the ISO
>
Hi,
We build ISO with simple-cdd but all iso created are failed since
6.1.0-30 was included inside repositories.
The cause is the current kernel initrd.gz still include kernel 6.1.0-29
as the repository provides the 6.1.0-30 and build the ISO according to
this new kernel.
This fails the
Dear Debian Mirror Team,
We are writing to formally register a new mirror for the Debian-CD at
the University of Puerto Rico. We currently operate a formal mirror of
Debian at https://mirrors.upr.edu/debian/ and would like to extend our
service by offering a mirror for the debian-cd archive as
> Hello Debian CD team!
>
> My request is to have a permanent link to the latest Debian stable ISO image
> on the debian-cd repository.
>
> We have a "current" folder on "https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/";;, but
> the ISO images in the iso-cd, is
serve the full set of ISO images for all architectures,
to reduce the amount of space taken up on the mirrors. You can use the
jigdo tool to recreate the missing ISO images instead.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release man
Where can can I find torrentsfor downloading Debian 12.5 installer 2 & 3
DVD isos
2 Macs and provide to the users. There has been a demand for
Debian for a long time and I wish to provide the ISOs for the same. I would
prefer making the ISO as similar to the official Debian ISO and just replace
the Debian kernel with the customised kernel.
I've already set up an apt repo
Hello,
On 02/05/2024 08:07, Roland Clobus wrote:
Hello,
On 01/05/2024 23:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Thanks Cyril for passing along the mail to the debian-live mailing list.
Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01):
The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5
(d
Hello,
On 01/05/2024 23:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Thanks Cyril for passing along the mail to the debian-live mailing list.
Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01):
The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5
(debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installat
Hello,
And thanks for the report.
Cc += debian-live@
Computer Enthusiastic (2024-05-01):
> The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5
> (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installation of the base
> system when started with the following
Hello,
The "Normal" [0] Debian Installer included in Debian Live ISO 12.5
(debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) fails the installation of the base
system when started with the following preseed parameters:
live-installer/enable=false firmware=never
The Debian insta
Hello!
I downloaded the weekly Trixie/Testing Netinstall & DVD1 iso's, but
both failed multiple times. It didn't matter if I downloaded with
Firefox, or by curl. All attempts failed installing the Base packages.
It hung, and would not recover.
Please regenerate before next week.
Thank you!
Ri
Hello and welcome.
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/
As you can see, as of 2024-03-07 it is not possible to build the current
amd64 (weekly-builds) Debian testing image.
However, the available ISO image (according to:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64
:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/03/threads.html
>(The one i reply to is your follow-up:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/03/msg00022.html
I didn't see it either.
>> > I don't see the cd iso on the iso-cd page.
>> > I mean a usual one, not
your follow-up:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2024/03/msg00022.html
)
> > I don't see the cd iso on the iso-cd page.
> > I mean a usual one, not a netinst.
I guess they have been discontinued because of the insane number of ISO
images with 650 MB which would emerge. (I estimate
I've received my own message to you. But I don't see your answer...
вт, 26.03.2024 20:25, Tatsu Takamaro пишет:
I don't see the cd iso on the iso-cd page.
I mean a usual one, not a netinst.
Good evening/morning everyone,
I find myself in a thought: as USB media becomes cheaper and cheaper,
more so than even Blu-Ray discs or especially DVDs, why not a full USB
set, for 16 or 32GB flash drives? Or at the very least, more automated
support for people who need to use flash drives with ap
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.2.1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
testing/trixie or greater ISO images will not successfully boot and enter
installation
phase.
Bookworm ISO images have no problems and are successful.
System dmidecode data:
# dmidecode 3.4
Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs
Hi Florian,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:00:07PM +, Florian Holzbauer wrote:
>Dear Debian Image Team,
>
>I relied on the standards iso live-cd iso files for some automated kernel
>testing.
>Why is there no standard isos available for stretch?
>
>Archive Path (e.g. 9.0.0
Dear Debian Image Team,
I relied on the standards iso live-cd iso files for some automated kernel
testing.
Why is there no standard isos available for stretch?
Archive Path (e.g. 9.0.0, but affects all 9.x):
https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/9.0.0-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/
Full
FOSS to me is all about community so I would
> hope that openQA works alongside the ISO testers rather than replace us.
> This is slightly off-topic but AI is doing a lot of damage to corporate
> tech and I hope that the FOSS projects don't fall victim to it too.
I don't think there&
ded to dive head first into the wonderful
>world of FOSS. I have been in the Microsoft ecosystem for the best part of
>two decades and only ever dabbled in Linux and Debian a little bit during
>that time. I recently took part in the Debian 12.1 ISO release event and I
>had fun, learned a
recently decided to dive head first into the
> wonderful world of FOSS. I have been in the Microsoft ecosystem for the best
> part of two decades and only ever dabbled in Linux and Debian a little bit
> during that time. I recently took part in the Debian 12.1 ISO release event
> and
n the Microsoft ecosystem
for the best part of two decades and only ever dabbled in Linux and
Debian a little bit during that time. I recently took part in the Debian
12.1 ISO release event and I had fun, learned a lot of things and met
some interesting people (including the former DPL Sled
Hi,
there is already a bug report about a similar problem
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988120
It points to file
jigdo-file-cache.db
and mentions a positive one-time effect, which would match the observation
that the first medium nearly always succeeds.
It works if jigdo-
ebian-12.0.0-source-DVD-1.iso'
The first DVD was ok. But then:
> ...
> Found 3646 of the 3647 files required by the template
> Copied input files to temporary file `debian-12.0.0-source-DVD-2.iso.tmp'
> ...
> Found 3907 of the 3908 files required by the template
> Copi
Hi,
griffin tucker wrote:
> jigdo-lite runs in batch mode, and usually the reconstruction of the
> first .iso is completely reconstructed from a directory of mounted
> .iso's from another format, however, the next few .iso's will
> consistently have 1 file missing that it
hi,
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 18:24, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> griffin tucker wrote:
> > there's a bug in jigdo that makes it occasionally skip files
>
> In that case the missing files woule be present but filled with zeros
> when you mount the incompletely
Hi,
griffin tucker wrote:
> there's a bug in jigdo that makes it occasionally skip files
In that case the missing files woule be present but filled with zeros
when you mount the incompletely composed ISO.
Can you confirm ?
Not picking a file of a jigdo image may have various reasons.
T
one.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 19:29, griffin tucker <
debianeidiaen24...@griffintucker.id.au> wrote:
> here's the truth table for debian-11.6.0 source .iso:
>
> present: o
> missing: x
>
> DLBD BD DVD file
> --- --- --- ---
> o x x pepperflashplugin-nonf
OK, no worries. Closing this bug then...
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 05:56:03PM -0400, Bud Heal wrote:
>My apologies. I built the DLBD .iso files and then moved them by USB because I
>was curious why occasionally more files keep being downloaded when I the files
>to scan already include t
Hi Bud,
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 02:54:00AM -0400, Bud Heal wrote:
>Package: debian-installer
>Version: 20210731+deb11u8
>Severity: important
>Tags: d-i
>X-Debbugs-Cc: budheal...@gmail.com
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
> * What led up to the situation?
>Since the DLB
loop += debian-cd
Bud Heal (2023-05-20):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20210731+deb11u8
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
> X-Debbugs-Cc: budheal...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> Since the DLBD .iso install neith
Hello,
Roland Clobus (2023-05-05):
> While replying to #1035381, I noticed that the label of the ISO netinst
> images is quite different for each of the variants:
>
> 11-released: Debian 11.7.0 amd64 n [1]
> daily: Debian testing amd64 n [2]
> RC2: Debian bookworm-DI-rc2 amd
Your message dated Sun, 30 Apr 2023 16:33:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031696: fixed in debian-cd 3.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031696,
regarding Use of symbolic links in non-free ISO images breaks file system
transposition support
to be marked as done.
This means
here's the truth table for debian-11.6.0 source .iso:
present: o
missing: x
DLBD BD DVD file
--- --- --- ---
o x x pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8.dsc
x o x frogatto_1.3.1+dfsg-5.dsc
x o x openjazz_20190106-3.dsc
x o x torbrowser-launcher_0.3.3-6.dsc
o o x alien-arena_7.66+dfsg-6.dsc
Hi,
Pete Batard wrote:
> Debian does not use an efi.img.
Oh it does with ISOs for i386 and amd64. There is a data file in the ISO
filesystem named
/boot/grub/efi.img
advertised as MBR partition of type 0xEF and as El Torito boot image
for EFI:
$ xorriso -indev debian-11.5.0-am
Hi,
Just going to report that I have tested media creation from the
2023-03-13 version of debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso, using only the
Windows native utilities (i.e. formatting a USB drive to FAT32 using
Windows Disk manager and mounting the ISO and copying the files using
Windows File
Hi,
James Addison wrote:
> The problem, in both cases, was that I hadn't copied the '.disk' dotfile
> directory from the install media ISO filesystem(s) in each case.
Besides such user pitfalls with the produced ISO and the problem of
symbolic links there are other constra
Hi James
On 2023.03.15 00:47, James Addison wrote:
The problem, in both cases, was that I hadn't copied the '.disk' dotfile
directory from the install media ISO filesystem(s) in each case.
Ah, yes, the infamous '.disk/' directory.
If it's any consolation,
Please disregard my previous message to this list, that was a bug
specific reply sent to the wrong e-mail.
/Pete
Hi James,
On 2023.03.15 00:47, James Addison wrote:
The problem, in both cases, was that I hadn't copied the '.disk' dotfile
directory from the install media ISO filesystem(s) in each case.
Ah, yes, the infamous '.disk/' directory.
If it's any consolation,
ecks of the FAT32 media contents were copied
> onto
> failed.
[sheepishly]
The problem, in both cases, was that I hadn't copied the '.disk' dotfile
directory from the install media ISO filesystem(s) in each case.
That caused this check to fail:
https://sources.debian.o
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 01:04:26 +, James Addison wrote:
> I've been able to build local NETINST ISO images successfully using the merged
> changes (thanks, Steve), and was also able to file-copy them to a FAT32
> filesystem and successfully boot from th
symbolic links in the ISO.
I will change the behavior so that a SORRY message is emitted in this
case. With default settings of xorriso this will cause a non-zero exit
value of xorriso. But processing will go on as with the current version.
genisoimage -f emits a warning and does not include the
On 2023.03.13 01:04, James Addison wrote:
Pete: perhaps it'd be worth filing a separate bug for the documentation-copy
issue? It'd be good to understand what the practical implications of that are.
I have now created
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032941.
Personally, I d
Package: debian-cd
Version: debian-testing-amd64-DVD.iso (2023.03.08)
This is a requested follow up to #1031696
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031696).
Besides essential installation packages using symlinks, the upcoming
bookworm also uses symlinks for non essential files
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1031696 [debian-cd] Use of symbolic links in non-free ISO images breaks
file system transposition support
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1031696: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
I've been able to build local NETINST ISO images successfully using the merged
changes (thanks, Steve), and was also able to file-copy them to a FAT32
filesystem and successfully boot from that into Debian Installer using QEMU.
Bui
simply end up with duplicate copies of the
> files.
I was worried about that too, but I think that with '-f', each resulting file
is only stored once within the resulting ISO image, so no additional storage
space (beyond the additional file record references) is required.
Test
unt firmware-bookworm-DI-alpha1-amd64-netinst.iso /mnt/iso
...
$ ls -l /mnt/iso/firmware
total 4
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 73 Sep 20 14:30
amd64-microcode_3.20220411.1_amd64.deb ->
../pool/non-free/a/amd64-microcode/amd64-microcode_3.20220411.1_amd64.deb
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 62 Sep
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 05:43:24PM +, James Addison wrote:
>Followup-For: Bug #1031696
>
>Thinking aloud: as an alternative, would adding the '-f' flag to MKISOFS
>achieve the desired result for both documentation and firmware files, without
>requiring any other changes?
No, then I expect we'l
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
Thinking aloud: as an alternative, would adding the '-f' flag to MKISOFS
achieve the desired result for both documentation and firmware files, without
requiring any other changes?
(I'll mention as context that there are symlinks in the debian-faq tarball
that is used as
Hi,
James Addison wrote:
> Please find below a proposed update to the commit message under discussion:
Only one nitpick:
> multiple filenames ("records"). The ISO9660 generation tools
> genisoimage and xorriso can use this to de-duplicate multiple linked
> files from their input, sav
in.
Context:
Debian bug #1031696 describes an issue where firmware files on
alpha-release debian-cd ISO images cannot easily be copied for
the purpose of creating another installation medium by users of
some operating systems.
Research:
When creating links to f
The FAT filesystem has no concept of links.
- MS-Windows does not read Rock Ridge and thus ignores the symbolic link
info anyways. (But this problem is not significant in the end.)
So how about:
"We'd also like the files of the ISO 9660 filesystem to be copyable to
as many filesyste
Package: debian-cd
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
Thank you again Thomas.
I've opened a merge request at
https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/-/merge_requests/30
My Debian mirror is still under construction, hence the 'draft' status for
the merge request (to indicate that I'm not certain
Hi,
James Addison wrote:
> My interpretation of the commands and output in your comment is that both
> genisoimage and xorriso can translate hardlinks from a source filesystem
> into deduplicated file references in a written ISO filesystem
With genisoimage we only know empirically. With
omas thomas 42786 Nov 14 2005 x
> $ genisoimage -o test2.iso -R /u/test/hardlinks
> ...
> 196 extents written (0 MB)
>
> We inspect the resulting ISO by xorriso:
>
> $ xorriso -indev test2.iso -find / -type f -exec report_lba --
> ...
> Report layout: xt , St
386 amd64 arm64 hppa,$(ARCHES)))
Surely i386, amd64, and arm64 get their published Debian ISOs made
by xorriso. hppa seems to have switched to xorriso between Debian 10 and
11. sparc64 10.0 is genisoimage, ppc64el 10.8.0 is xorriso,
armhf 10.1.0 is xorriso ...
powerpc needs HFS and thus its ISO i
mlinks by
> hardlinks should be technically possible.
> xorriso represents hard link siblings in ISO 9660 and Joliet as data files
> which use the same data content blocks. So these views of the Debian ISO
> would produce separate copies of target and link when both get extracted
Hi James,
> so the regression:
>
> * IS NOT that non-free firmware becomes unavailable when UEFI
> file transposition is used to create bootable drives
> -- because that firmware was not available previously
>
> * IS that bootable drives created using UEFI file transposition
> fro
mbolic links to data files. So replacing symlinks by
hardlinks should be technically possible.
xorriso represents hard link siblings in ISO 9660 and Joliet as data files
which use the same data content blocks. So these views of the Debian ISO
would produce separate copies of target and link when bo
Package: debian-cd
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
Hi Pete - could you check my understanding of your paragraph:
> In short, if this issue is left unaddressed, bookworm will be
> introducing a *regression* compared to bullseye, in that it will no
> longer be possible to perform a Debian installation
Package: debian-cd
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 03:31:50 +, Pete wrote:
> Just going to add, in case you wonder why it shouldn't be up to the
> software that is mounting the ISO to sort out symbolic links and just
> duplicate content, that neither Windows
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-cd
Bug #1031696 [cdimage.debian.org] Use of symbolic links in non-free ISO images
breaks file system transposition support
Bug reassigned from package 'cdimage.debian.org' to 'debian-cd'.
Ignoring request to alter found v
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@akeo.ie
Control: reassign -1 debian-cd
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
I forgot to mention: thanks, Pete, for testing this UEFI file transposition
support
with bookworm's d-i alpha 2.
We're all volunteers and I'm no expert with the CD image build process,
Thanks for looking into this.
Just going to add, in case you wonder why it shouldn't be up to the
software that is mounting the ISO to sort out symbolic links and just
duplicate content, that neither Windows File Explorer nor 7-zip (both of
which can mount/extract ISO content) will
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #1031696
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@akeo.ie
My best guess at the moment is that the relevant section of the CD image
preparation scripts is:
https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/-/blob/5aebb6794a3b8b2393663fb643e35eb8e510c9a4/tools/make_disc_trees.p
Hello,
test of "debian-11.6.0-ppc64el-DVD-1.iso"
installer fail to start, kernel crash.
Test on Tyan TN71-BP012 (IBM POWER8), the iso was created with dd to USB.
(Petitboot (dev.20150810) TN71-BP012 TCGQV04D0011)
The same kernel work on this computer via upgraded (on SSD) Debian 10 to
Hi Laurent,
Laurent GUERBY (2022-10-17):
> Trying to install the testing netinst ISO in a VM (in proxmox):
>
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-te
> sting-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> The issue is that the installer fails to find an ethernet car
ss
>stops shortly after
>searching for installation files, bringing up a read error. Running the md5
>integrity check will eventually
>find an error with some file on the system, though the specific file varies on
>installation attempts. Thus it is not
>possible to install the .iso
integrity check will eventually
find an error with some file on the system, though the specific file varies on
installation attempts. Thus it is not
possible to install the .iso. This is despite correct sha256sum checks. A
netinst iso is available and works fine,
as a temporary workaround.
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:38:09AM +0200, RiseUp wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying an installation on an old iMac PowerPC G4 700MHz.
>
>If you know an iso image doing this witrh a size less ro equal 700MB (to
>record it on a CD), I'll be gratefull.
You'
Hello,
I'm trying an installation on an old iMac PowerPC G4 700MHz.
If you know an iso image doing this witrh a size less ro equal 700MB (to
record it on a CD), I'll be gratefull.
Stefane
nstallation when using
>> debian-10.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso. Can we easily upgrade only the kernel
>> from 4.19 to 5.10(from backport) in the
>> debian-10.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso to create a custom ISO image ?
>
>
> there is a workaround: you can install buster with bullseye&
10(from backport) in the
> debian-10.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso to create a custom ISO image ?
>
there is a workaround: you can install buster with bullseye's install image.
in the syslinux menu, select expert mode,
you will get an option about which release to install.
> Kindly help
>
>
installation, the ethernet is working. But we need the i225-V
support during installation when using
debian-10.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso. Can we easily upgrade only the kernel
from 4.19 to 5.10(from backport) in the
debian-10.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso to create a custom ISO image ?
Kindly help
The 16GB USB stick image is pointless if people cannot install any of the
thousand pieces of software after rebooting after the initial install of
Bullseye, which will be the case for most people.
I wasted hours looking for a solution online, stumbling upon countless people
totally stuck, and fi
if
>>the dependencies of a software end up in an ISO but not the software
>>actually depending on them.
>
> No, there is *not* obviously a problem there. There would be a problem
> the *other* way round, as then you'd have the top-level software
> package but not be able to
7;s sources.list and then installed missing package(s) as though
they were on the medium. (see the man page: sources.list(5) )
> But obviously there is a problem with the current algo being used if
> the dependencies of a software end up in an ISO but not the software
> actually depending on
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:01:54PM +0200, epsommum...@virgilio.it wrote:
>I am now using the BluRay image which contains Spyder and its dependencies, so
>I am fine.
>
>But obviously there is a problem with the current algo being used if
>the dependencies of a software end up in an
I am now using the BluRay image which contains Spyder and its dependencies, so
I am fine.
But obviously there is a problem with the current algo being used if the
dependencies of a software end up in an ISO but not the software actually
depending on them.
I remember being surprised by the size
not use Spyder put python3-spyder in this ISO thinking it was
>the real Spyder software, except that it was just one if its dependencies.
>You could either remove the dependencies or add the small Spyder package, but
>leaving things as they are makes no sense.
Packages are ordered and p
Hi Steve!
The 16GB image is actually less than 15GB.
The Spyder package is 200kb.
There is ample room.
Someone who does not use Spyder put python3-spyder in this ISO thinking it was
the real Spyder software, except that it was just one if its dependencies.
You could either remove the
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:26:53PM +0200, epsommum...@virgilio.it wrote:
>
>The Spyder package is missing from jigdo amd64 weekly 16 GB stick ISO.
>
>All its dependencies are there like python3-spyder, but since spyder
>itself is missing, spyder can not be used.
>
>https
Hi !
The Spyder package is missing from jigdo amd64 weekly 16 GB stick ISO.
All its dependencies are there like python3-spyder, but since spyder itself is
missing, spyder can not be used.
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-16G/
https://packages.debian.org/fr/sid
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 09:38 -0700, Lou Poppler wrote:
[...]
> Mar 30 14:17:28 base-installer: info: Using squashfs support for
> /cdrom/live/filesystem.squashfs
> Mar 30 14:17:28 anna-install: Installing squashfs-modules
> Mar 30 14:17:28 anna[8759]: ERROR **: can't find packages file
> Mar 30 14:
be clear, we are talking here about trying to use the text-mode
> installer from the boot menu of a buster debian-live ISO image.
> I'm trying to take a look at the lowmem code now.
>
loop.ko is in /lib/modules/4.19.0-16-686/kernel/drivers/block/
em to be
working correctly right now. I even anna-install'ed the module again from the
network on one attempt, but the installer couldn't find it anymore.
Just to be clear, we are talking here about trying to use the text-mode
installer from the boot menu of a buster debian-live ISO imag
On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 20:16 +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, Lou Poppler wrote:
>
> > This is a more detailed do-over of a failed install I encountered earlier
> > today
> > while testing debian-live-10.9.0-i386-cinnamon+nonfree.iso during the 10.9
> > release testing party on #d
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, Lou Poppler wrote:
This is a more detailed do-over of a failed install I encountered earlier today
while testing debian-live-10.9.0-i386-cinnamon+nonfree.iso during the 10.9
release testing party on #debian-cd.
[...]
Mar 28 03:15:07 main-menu[228]: INFO: Menu item 'live
1 - 100 of 993 matches
Mail list logo
