Re: Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread Gordon Huff
At 01:42 PM 1/2/2004 -0500, you wrote: Does there exist a set of examples for making the jigdo tools actually produce iso images instead of downloading 4.5 gig of file parts and then crashing with no explanation Well, yes. The Peter Jay Salzman HOWTO has examples. ? I mean, it _seems_ like a good

Re: Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread Gordon Huff
At 01:42 PM 1/2/2004 -0500, you wrote: Does there exist a set of examples for making the jigdo tools actually produce iso images instead of downloading 4.5 gig of file parts and then crashing with no explanation Well, yes. The Peter Jay Salzman HOWTO has examples. ? I mean, it _seems_ like a goo

Re: Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread Richard Atterer
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 01:42:59PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All I ever end up with is enormous files that > jigdo refuses to use the next pass: I vaguely remember such a problem existed, but that was long ago - are you using the latest version of jigdo? Under Windows or Linux? Cheers,

Re: Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread Richard Atterer
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 01:42:59PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All I ever end up with is enormous files that > jigdo refuses to use the next pass: I vaguely remember such a problem existed, but that was long ago - are you using the latest version of jigdo? Under Windows or Linux? Cheers,

Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread kc8cgh
Does there exist a set of examples for making the jigdo tools actually produce iso images instead of downloading 4.5 gig of file parts and then crashing with no explanation? I mean, it _seems_ like a good idea to only get the parts that have changed, but I cannot find any clear explanation for w

Getting jigdo to actually work

2004-01-02 Thread kc8cgh
Does there exist a set of examples for making the jigdo tools actually produce iso images instead of downloading 4.5 gig of file parts and then crashing with no explanation? I mean, it _seems_ like a good idea to only get the parts that have changed, but I cannot find any clear explanation for w