Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-05-11 Thread Mattias Wadenstein
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > > > That machine is already dying. I would need some slot 1 PIII processors to > > > speed that up, but they are very hard to find... > > Well, in an effort to get a bit less load on it, I'm offering > > push-triggered mirroring of the director

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-05-09 Thread Mattias Wadenstein
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > > (Um, Attila probably doesn't like the idea of seeing fsn.hu melt down, > > with 12 mirrors each rsyncing 5GB of data from it... :-/ Does the rsync > > mirror script use "rsync --hard-links"? In that case, the complete rsync > > could be avoid

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-24 Thread Philip Hands
On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 17:23, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > > I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and > > > only the released images, on the master site. > > > > > > Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the > > > master site, and are only present

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-19 Thread Gunnar Wolf
> > I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and > > only the released images, on the master site. > > > > Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the > > master site, and are only present as jigdos that generate .iso files, > > but the fact that

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-19 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I like the fact that .iso extension is used for the released images, and > only the released images, on the master site. > > Of course, that point is moot when the images cease to exist on the > master site, and are only present as j

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-19 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 10:54, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:54:47PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Siddhu wrote: > > > your Faq about the iso burning does not answer, how to burn a .raw > > > file. > > > > a .raw file is exactly the same as a .iso file a

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-19 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > (Um, Attila probably doesn't like the idea of seeing fsn.hu melt down, > with 12 mirrors each rsyncing 5GB of data from it... :-/ Does the rsync > mirror script use "rsync --hard-links"? In that case, the complete rsync > could be avoided by using hard links.) That machine is already dyi

Re: Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-19 Thread Richard Atterer
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:54:47PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Siddhu wrote: > > your Faq about the iso burning does not answer, how to burn a .raw > > file. > > a .raw file is exactly the same as a .iso file and can be burned in > the same way. Rather than changing the FA

Burning a .raw file...

2002-04-17 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
jason andrade wrote: > Siddhu wrote: >> your Faq about the iso burning does not answer, how to burn a .raw file. > a .raw file is exactly the same as a .iso file and can be burned in the same way. Hello: I.e.: if your CDROM burner is expecting an ".iso" file, you can just rename the ".raw" f