Hi Charles,
Thanks for taking the time to report your problems - it's appreciated!
If you can answer some of my questions below, that would be very
helpful too.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:49:48PM +1300, schatzclan wrote:
>Package: cdimage.debian.org
>
>I have two PC boxes:
>
>1997-vintage - i586-
Hi,
Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd ask that when interacting with end users, you be more clear about
> what you're trying to do.
I am trying to answer this question from the bug report:
> > Could it be that the hybrid CD/USB iso is causing problems?
The answer is for now:
It might be a problem with M
> "Thomas" == Thomas Schmitt writes:
Thomas> Hi,
Thomas> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
Thomas> I care in my role as upstream of xorriso.
OK.
I'd ask that when interacting with end users, you be more clear about
what you're trying to do.
I'
Hi,
Sam Hartman wrote:
> Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
I care in my role as upstream of xorriso.
As for debian-cd, any oddity of installation ISOs should be inspected
and judged whether it demands action.
I see i forgot to Cc: the bug reporter.
Hi ! There are replies to see at:
Why does mountability matter anyway?
The interesting question is whether it boots on the target system,
right? Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
Hi,
(This is about the aspect Mac mountability, not about the aspect of
suitable performance during or after installation..)
Shirish Agarwal wrote:
> Would it be possible to upload the image to someplace where the OP
> could download and use it and see if that works for him.
It is nearly 4 GB o
at bottom :-
On 17/01/2017, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i made a copy + paste error with the repacking command.
> Option -apm-block-size lacks its parameter "2048".
>
> Correct would be:
>
> mount debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso /mnt/iso
>
> xorriso -as mkisofs \
> -o test.iso \
> -
Hi,
i made a copy + paste error with the repacking command.
Option -apm-block-size lacks its parameter "2048".
Correct would be:
mount debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso /mnt/iso
xorriso -as mkisofs \
-o test.iso \
-V 'Debian 8.6.0 i386 1' \
--modification-date='2016091713290100' \
Hi,
schatzclan wrote:
> unexpectedly larger
> actual file size (642M) vs reported size (613M) for the “i386 8.x.0 LXDE
> CD#1” iso.
This is explainable from the difference of programmer's MiB and IEC's MB:
642.0 / 1024 / 1024 * 1000 * 1000 = 612.2589111328125
> The “i386 8.5.0 XFCE CD#1” ISO
at bottom :-
On 17/01/2017, schatzclan wrote:
> Package: cdimage.debian.org
>
> I have two PC boxes:
>
> 1997-vintage - i586-200Mhz/128M/6.3G. I have given up installing Debian
> due to performance issues and a problem with “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1”, as
> the hybrid iso images on versions 8.5.0, 8.6
Package: cdimage.debian.org
I have two PC boxes:
1997-vintage - i586-200Mhz/128M/6.3G. I have given up installing Debian
due to performance issues and a problem with “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1”, as
the hybrid iso images on versions 8.5.0, 8.6.0 and 8.7.0 seem to be
damaged. The MD5 checksums all s
11 matches
Mail list logo
