>I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
> There's no release of installer yet, since squeeze, thus this still
> points to the current installer. We plan to get one running soon.
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. The problem is not that the mini
image is older, that
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:33, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:49:17AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
I'm not objecting to the fact that "mini" uses an older kernel; but
I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
>>
>>> Which mini image? A URL would
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:49:17AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>>>I'm not objecting to the fact that "mini" uses an older kernel; but
>>>I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
>
>> Which mini image? A URL would be handy, as I'm not sure what you might
>> be using.
>
>h
>>I'm not objecting to the fact that "mini" uses an older kernel; but
>>I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented.
> Which mini image? A URL would be handy, as I'm not sure what you might
> be using.
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/imag
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:29:05PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>Package: cdimage.debian.org
>
>Hi.
>
>I've just installed testing on a laptop with a very recent Ethernet
>chipset, only supported by Linux 2.6.38 and later.
>
>I started with the "mini" image, and failed, being unable to use the
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Hi.
I've just installed testing on a laptop with a very recent Ethernet
chipset, only supported by Linux 2.6.38 and later.
I started with the "mini" image, and failed, being unable to use the
Ethernet interface. It turned out that the mini image uses the older
kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
