-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Also, when apt-install is fixed to complain about queued items that fail
>> to install, won't it start complaining about acpi if it's not on the
>> netinst?
>
> I
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Also, when apt-install is fixed to complain about queued items that fail
> to install, won't it start complaining about acpi if it's not on the
> netinst?
I have a half-finished patch that does that, but it depends on how
apt-install is called. It wi
Also, when apt-install is fixed to complain about queued items that fail
to install, won't it start complaining about acpi if it's not on the
netinst?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Frans Pop wrote:
> IIRC you once said that maybe we should not install acpi at all as it's not
> really needed (only acpid is). On that basis I've always thought that is
> was OK to install it if available and not if, eh, not.
It's true that it's not really needed. However, I think we should mak
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> Did find one buglet -- acpi was not installed. Though acpid and
> acpi-support-base both were, and /proc/acpi is there. Note that I
> de-selected the laptop task, which also installs it. But hw-detect
> should have caused it to be installed anyway.
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
