feedback from first time Debian CD user

2004-02-16 Thread a b
I previously posted that I found discrepancies in the MD5s with 3.0 r2 ISO contents: http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2004/debian-cd-200401/msg00089.html I haven't seen any follow-up or any notes added to http://www.debian.org/CD/ on this matter. Having successfully completed a few installatio

feedback from first time Debian CD user

2004-02-16 Thread a b
I previously posted that I found discrepancies in the MD5s with 3.0 r2 ISO contents: http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2004/debian-cd-200401/msg00089.html I haven't seen any follow-up or any notes added to http://www.debian.org/CD/ on this matter. Having successfully completed a few installatio

MD5 discrepancies with 3.0 r2 ISO contents

2004-01-18 Thread a b
I found several discrepancies between the md5sum.txt and the contents for the ISO images (downloaded from mirror ftp://ftp.lug.udel.edu/ pub/iso-images/Debian/3.0_r2/i386/) for 3.0 r2. Most of the CDs consistently show two problems: 1. './README.html', which I see others have reported, and 2. a b

MD5 discrepancies with 3.0 r2 ISO contents

2004-01-18 Thread a b
I found several discrepancies between the md5sum.txt and the contents for the ISO images (downloaded from mirror ftp://ftp.lug.udel.edu/ pub/iso-images/Debian/3.0_r2/i386/) for 3.0 r2. Most of the CDs consistently show two problems: 1. './README.html', which I see others have reported, and 2. a b