On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>Why's that? Isn't UDF widely supported?
>
> Implementations often widely differ in their limitations - see the
> Wikipedia page for more details. The suggested way to make a safe UDF
> DVD is often along the lines of "use the ISO9660 bridge
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>64 is quite low. Is there no way to use longer filenames that still
>>works on all required platforms?
>
> To do that, we'll have to switch to a different filesystem. That's a
> possibility (maybe UDF), but there's probably even more of a ch
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> users. The problem is that Joliet has a limit for filename length (64
> characters), and technically we're already past that length. From
> genisoimage.1:
64 is quite low. Is there no way to use longer filenames that still
works on all requ
3 matches
Mail list logo
