On Sep 03, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> This still seems to be the case, since the pxe_dns function in efi/pxe.c
> in the current HEAD
> (http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/blob/HEAD:/efi/pxe.c, lines 38-49) will
> `return 0` in all cases.
Yes, it is even worse than this: even if I pass to syslinux in
Package: pxelinux
Version: 3:6.04~git20171011.af7e95c3+dfsg1-4
Severity: normal
With this configuration:
dhcp-option=option:bootfile-name,/pxelinux/lpxelinux.0
dhcp-option-force=209,/syslinux.cfg
I expected that pxelinux would try to download /syslinux.cfg and not
/pxelinux//syslinux.cfg:
dnsma
Package: syslinux-efi
Version: 3:6.04~git20171011.af7e95c3+dfsg1-4
Severity: important
When providing to syslinux.efi an http URL in option 67:
dhcp-option=option:bootfile-name,http://pxe.example.net/EFI/SYSLINUX/syslinux.efi
then it will try to download the modules like ldlinux.e64, the
config
On Nov 12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> changes, isn't a point of argumentation (see my previous mail). All of
> >> the packages must be taken from stable, unchanged, and if some are taken
> >> from backports, this must be explicit, and the image shouldn't be called
> >> "stable Debian". Official,
On Nov 12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> changes, isn't a point of argumentation (see my previous mail). All of
> the packages must be taken from stable, unchanged, and if some are taken
> from backports, this must be explicit, and the image shouldn't be called
> "stable Debian". Official, yes, but not
On Nov 10, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> with my trademark hat on: We asked waldi & zobel to bounce this
> request off of debian-cloud and debian-cd prior to granting the right
> to use the Debian name. We are looking for rough consensus as defined
> in RFC7282 that these images are close enough to D
On Sep 09, Paul Wise wrote:
> Isn't tasksel for people with no expectations? People who know
> something about the technology they are looking for will install the
> relevant packages instead of following tasksel recommendations.
Tasksel is not about recommendations: its purpose is to easily inst
On Aug 08, Joey Hess wrote:
> I recently spent some time installing community computer labs in rural
> Brazil. Internet bandwidth was nearly nonexistant[1], so if you were
I am sure that we could have a great competition for finding potential
users with even crappier connectivity and even more o
On May 14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> It is my impression from my visits in the Fall (although I do not have
> any hard data to support it) that in India and Indonesia network access
> is generally so slow that even if computers have DVD drives the common
> media downloaded and used is CD.
This
On May 14, Neil Williams wrote:
> I'd support XFCE4 as the default Graphical Desktop Environment and
> possibly putting GNOME (and KDE) as alternative options.
What is the point of providing a default which is not what people
usually want?
Just document that a normal desktop install will require
Server name is ftp3.linux.it AKA ftp.it.debian.org, managed by the
Italian Linux Society, plenty of bandwidth. Methods:
rsync ftp3.linux.it::debian-cd
ftp://ftp3.linux.it/pub/cd-images/
http://ftp3.linux.it/cd-images/
i386 only.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
