I know about it
is what I read at
https://jonathancarter.org/2019/10/17/calamares-plans-for-debian-11/
via planet Debian some time ago, but maybe it's something to
investigate...
See also https://packages.debian.org/buster/calamares
Ian.
no need to wait for a mirror pulse), but if that
doesn't work for a given setup there's no reason not to change to use a
mirror, it looks like deb.debian.org supports security so presumably
that's a good bet.
Ian.
like
at least a decade).
EC2 uses pvgrub, not pygrub, although AFAICT pvgrub has also never had
a problem with partitions.
Ian.
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:06 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 23:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Getting a bit OT for the bug.
>
> > In fact, I've seen this exact problem myself on a Libreboot machine
> > when trying to install Jessie a few week
taller by hand that
> way. It looks like a (design?) bug that Libreboot won't do normal boot
> sector booting like a conventional BIOS.
I think for that case you want (or need) to use seabios as your coreboot
payload, since it provides the necessary "conventional BIOS" part of the
puzzle.
Ian.
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 08:02 +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote:
> Please have a look and pick what you like.
FYI only this intro mail seems to have made it to the list.
Ian.
>
> Philipp Hahn (4):
> Replace previous sym-links
> Use only first package candidate
> Anchor pa
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 11:34 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 08:41:36AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 22:26 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > >
> > > [Off topic for _this_ list: I've got UEFI netboot working wit
is can be avoided (perhaps using some more advanced
scripting). I had a brief look at one point and it seemed non-trivial
(plus I was worried about breaking existing uses)
Ian.
> Ubuntu and CentOS 7 appear to use grubnetx64.efi at the moment for
> UEFI netboot - on topic for debian-efi?]
>
a.
>
>
> If not known: Towards which package to report ?
Assuming it isn't thought to be a qemu but then against the "debian
-installer" package please. I've not heard of it but please check the
buglist first (reportbug will prompt you do to so anyway).
Cheers,
Ian.
Control: reassign -1 debian-cd
This is actually the responsibility of the debian-cd package,
reassigning.
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 15:17 +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> Package: grub-efi-ia32-bin
> Version: 2.02~beta2-22
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When installing Debia
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 17:10 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:40:26PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Ian Campbell (2015-03-26):
> >> On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 19:44 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> >> > due to https://bugs.debian.org/773645 off
+
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+flash-kernel (3.34) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Update u-boot-tools to Recommends. In practice it is needed on most systems
+but having it installed only by flash-kernel-installer means it is missed
+in manual configurations. (Closes: #780994)
+
+ -- Ian Campbell
n upload
to Jessie soon.
I assume a recommends will cause d-cd to do the desired thing?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1427405940.1320.31.ca...@debian.org
vmlinuz downloaded locally but are pulling udebs off the network, which
might therefore be newer.
Please reread my caveat now though ;-)
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1425568787.25940.233.ca...@debian.org
tinst images instead, they are more polished and better tested
etc (since they share code with the larger ISO images and what have
you).
At some point it seems like improving mini.iso more for end users would
simply be duplicating effort with the CD team.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> -isohybrid-gpt-basdat
>
> directly after -e and its argument.
I don't suppose I can tempt you into sending a patch against the above
git repo, can I? ;-)
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
p /boot/grub
/boot/grub
/boot/grub/efi.img
/boot/grub/font.pf2
/boot/grub/grub.cfg
/boot/grub/x86_64-efi
/boot/grub/x86_64-efi/acpi.mod
[...lots more...]
> It'd be nice to start by telling us the full URL to the mini.iso you
> downloaded.
Yes, please.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 10:41 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2015-01-07, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > And therefore aren't they more usefully built along with
> > that iso? Otherwise how do you know how big to make the partition to
> > contain the iso at d-i build time
ms (syslinux/isolinux/grub) as well. Probably we
> > should do that, but then it would have to be done for all
> > platforms. Kibi?
>
> ISTR having proposed a patch to #700026 / #696418, but that wasn't
> commented upon.
FWIW the patch in #700026 looks good to me as a starting
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 22:13 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:51:18PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:46:37AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > > BTW our kernel now supports the /chosen/stdout-path property in fdt and
> &g
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:51 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:46:37AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 01:59 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
>
> > Talking about other compression schemes or providing multiple versions
> > of
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 08:59 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2015-01-02, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> >> On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> >> I think the difference is one is a set of netboot images,
oard.img.gz
> 18552 Wandboard_Quad.img.gz
>
So around 200M in total? I haven't checked but I would imagine that was
an order of magnitude more than d-i produces for any other arch in the
d-i builds.
I suppose though that it is pretty negligible (even when doubled by the
hd-media variant) compared with the full size of a mirror, but it is
getting towards 0.5G. I'm not sure who should be consulted about that.
If these images were built separately from the main d-i build then we
could e.g. mirror them via the debian-cd mechanisms instead of the main
mirror, where they would feel like a better fit.
(Do your patches end up adding the correct Built-Using on u-boot?)
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1420195597.2030.48.ca...@debian.org
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > 0004-Add-SD-card-image-build-support-for-hd-media-builds-.patch
> ...
> > It seems to be creating a copy of dtbs again, please lets try
> > and keep i
ectories (i.e. things
added alongside netboot, hd-media, network-console etc) describing what
each one is would help?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419953311.13595.190.ca...@debian.org
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 15:18 +0100, Lars-Daniel Weber wrote:
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2014 um 15:13 Uhr
> > Von: "Ian Campbell"
> > An: "Lars-Daniel Weber"
> >
> > In that case I can't explain the difference between the two, sorry
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 15:10 +0100, Lars-Daniel Weber wrote:
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2014 um 15:01 Uhr
> > Von: "Ian Campbell"
> >
> > TBH you are chopping and changing between so many different scenarios
> > that I'm not really sure w
s/wheezy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
? That's the Wheezy image, whereas if you build from git you are picking up
the Sid/Jessie version of things, which corresponds to what is under
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/.
Perhaps Wheezy didn't sup
.cfg outside initrd without a problem. But building the installer on
> my own takes
> lots of dependencies... I wonder, what went wrong on the automatic build of
> mini.iso :(
What do you mean by a outside the initrd? How are you self-building
these netboot images?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1418995678.20028.39.ca...@hellion.org.uk
On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 10:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> ---
> Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 54393a7..5413e87 100755
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ ifndef TASK
>
---
tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64 b/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64
index 3021467..e67773b 100755
--- a/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64
+++ b/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/bash
-#
The d-i supplied grub.cfg has the correct entries in it already.
---
tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64 | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64 b/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64
index 43f290c..3021467 100755
--- a/tools/boot/jessie/boot-arm64
+++ b/tools/boot/
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 54393a7..5413e87 100755
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ ifndef TASK
TASK=Debian-generic
endif
ifndef MKISOFS
-ifneq (,$(filter i386 amd64,$(ARCHES)))
+ifneq (,$(filter i386
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:14 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:02:12PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >I was thinking more along the lines of a yes/no question which would
> >either cause partman-efi.isinstallable to fail or not. Allowing
> >selection
ng to replace a system shouldn't be worried about the
> installer warning them that they can't boot the (to be replaced) old
> system anymore, and can safely ignore that message.
I was thinking more along the lines of a yes/no question which would
either cause partman-efi.isinst
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 15:47 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ian Campbell (2014-09-28):
> > Should we do anything about #762007 (user-params breakage due to
> > kernel changes) or can it wait?
>
> I might be mistaken but I think it can wait a bit until we agree on a
> sol
lack
> of time and other large ongoing changes: let's see if we can get
> debian-cd to cope with latest tasksel changes soon.
Should we do anything about #762007 (user-params breakage due to kernel
changes) or can it wait?
WRT #762618 (empty grub.cfg in x86 mini.iso, used on EFI systems
t was my initial thought, but then someone pointed out: what
> happens to a user who explicitly *wants* to replace their existing
> legacy system with a new UEFI one?
Is isinstallable allowed to ask debconf question?
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
appreciate it if the tasksel maintainers would let us know:
Do you intend to review (or are you reviewing) the decision taken in
July 2012 [1] ? If so, is this discussion here on -devel useful ? If
it is useful, what questions should we be focusing on ?
Ian.
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gi
ht not be able to
> have the full GNOME environment, but the computer using the CD would
> not be able to use it anyway.
Wouldn't such a computer be able to use xfce ? I have a computer from
2003-2005 that seems to be running xfce perfectly happily (and I have
reinstalled it recently).
drwxr-xr-x3 root root 16384 Jul 17 15:53 lists
drwxr-xr-x3 root root 4096 Jul 17 15:43 mirrors
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Jun 29 14:00 periodic
This doesn't seem to be anything Xen specific here.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 20:15 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >I can't think of any reason not to do this, I assume there is tons of
> >room.
> >
> >I confess I haven't tested the patch since my mirro
dating my mirror now, so I ought to be able to test in a week or
so.
Thanks,
Ian
diff --git a/cronjob.weekly b/cronjob.weekly
index c9170a0..5d0d400 100755
--- a/cronjob.weekly
+++ b/cronjob.weekly
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ if lockfile -r0 $TOPDIR/.debian-cd.lock ; then
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 21:19 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:55:10PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >diff --git a/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-x86 b/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-x86
> >index 1b23b1b..2cc090b 100644
> >--- a/tools/boot/wheezy/boot-x86
> >+++ b
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:55 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'd quite like to rename the xm-debian.cfg shipped by d-i to just
> >debian.cfg. The "xm" came from the previous Xen tool
pha/beta release is made there will necessarily be a d-i upload
first (with this change)?
Patches to both are attached, I can checkin the d-i one myself if
debian-cd are happy with the approach.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
"It's ten o'clock... Do you know w
This appears to have been missed in r2264.
---
data/wheezy/exclude-udebs-i386 |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/data/wheezy/exclude-udebs-i386 b/data/wheezy/exclude-udebs-i386
index 893aa34..8602305 100644
--- a/data/wheezy/exclude-udebs-i386
+++ b/data/wh
uild
> looks good, and I've back-ported the fix back to the squeeze branch of
> debian-cd so that 6.0.2 should be correct.
Doest this have an impact (i.e. perhaps make it obsolete) the
VARIANT_xen stuff e.g. in tools/generate_di+k_list? I suppose the
variant stuff is orthogonal to this
Does anybody have any comments on this RFC?
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 22:12 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the Squeeze release we added support for Xen PV installation from
> certain ISO images which have the Xen variant enabled in Debian CD (the
> multiarch x86 ISOs) w
vanced
for example.
Ian.
PS: Is there some trick to quickly testing the isolinux menus? I've been
doing:
#!/bin/sh
set -ex
export PATH=util:${PATH}:/usr/sbin:/sbin
rm -rf tmp/cdrom_isolinux/cd_info tmp/cdrom_gtk/cd_info
make
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 14:51 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:42:13AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 17:29 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Please give it a try:
> >>
> >
.
debian-sq-di-rc1-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso is missing the i386 and
amd64 di kernel modules. This has happened before on and off and AFAIK
is simply due to the overall size of the stuff on the CD so I'm not sure
what to suggest.
debian-sq-di-rc1-i386-amd64-source-DVD-1.iso works fine unde
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 10:39 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 08:52:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >I just checked debian-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso vs
> >firmware-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso from
> >http://cdimage.debian.org
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:12 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:49:18AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 10:43 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:05:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 20
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 10:43 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:05:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 00:32 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:26:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> >After strug
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 00:32 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:26:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >After struggling for a bit due to CONF.sh overwriting my settings (I've
> >figured out about DEBIAN_CD_CONF_SOURCED now!) I managed to do a sid m-a
>
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:50 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:35:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > >On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:23 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jul 08,
stems which
would have previously got 686 (I can confirm if necessary). This isn't
necessarily a bad thing -- it enables NX support for one thing which is
generally desirable.
FWIW RHEL 6 (the beta at least) ships with only a PAE (aka 686-bigmem)
kernel, I guess things are heading that way ge
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 12:50 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 03:35:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:23 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> >I don't t
ages
# Extra variants to enable. See docs/README.variants for more information.
-export VARIANTS=
+#export VARIANTS=
# We don't want certain packages to take up space on CD1...
#export EXCLUDE1=exclude
--
Ian Campbell
Pray to God, but keep rowing to shore.
-- Russian Pro
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:23 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >I don't think libuuid-perl really needs perl and I have filed #588427 to
> >that effect.
>
> Cool.
It's tagged as pending already in
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:45 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:49:52AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:16:59AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>
> >>Hardlinks are used in preference to symlinks since these are expec
I guess maybe this was selected from popcon to fill the
slack left by things which were bumped?
> (Looking at the log files make_disc_tree.log and sort_deps.i386.log
> for this info...)
Thanks for the pointer.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Pendulum - Plastic World (feat. Fats & TC)
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 01:16 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:49:36AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 22:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> the multi-arch DVD.
> >
> >Another random thought, would we be better off enabli
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 22:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> the multi-arch DVD.
Another random thought, would we be better off enabling the xen variant
on the m-a DVD rather than CD?
Ian.
--
--
Ian Campbell
"Pull the trigger and you're garbage."
-- Lady Bl
system but is on the CD
as well. Similarly nothing seems to pull in binutils or doc-linux-text
deliberately. (I'm picking on these packages because they are the
largest components under pool/main/*)
I have a feeling I'm misunderstanding the technical definition of base
system. I thought i
ort hardlinks but not symlinks so that's another argument
for hardlinks. If we think isolinux would be a problem then we could
restrict this to files under install.*/xen/.
Ian.
---
Subject: boot-x86: detect duplicates in the extra images used for installation
Several files included under inst
m:516338
> i386:main:linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem:2930
Is this list part of the output somewhere when I do a local build either
with easy-build.sh or by replicating the invocation from debian-cd-setup
SVN?
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 21:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> One thing to note is that the amd64
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 21:49 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 21:12 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> >
> >> Ian Campbell writes:
> >>
> >>> Another option might be to combine gtk/initrd.gz and xen/initrd.
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 21:12 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>
> > Another option might be to combine gtk/initrd.gz and xen/initrd.gz so
> > that the overhead is only the kernel udebs and not duplicating all the
> > other stuff.
>
> I probably m
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:17 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The Lenny multi arch netinst amd64+i3486+powerpc was 472M which left
> around 178M spare so I wonder where that space has gone.
> [...]
> I'll take a look at the non-package content of the DVD next since
> there seems to
586
class machines are likely to be a dying breed and there are other images
which contain that kernel for those occasions. (although I guess the
same rationale could be applied to having i386 at all when amd64 is on
the image too ;-) )
Does anyone else have an opinion?
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Curr
since there
seems to ~50M accounted there.
Is there any indication of by how much we are currently overflowing? Is
it simply the total of:
> i386:main:linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem:27213342
> i386:main:linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem:3036
> i386:main:linux-headers-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem:516338
hings...
I'm afraid I don't have any good ideas. Is this particular image
supposed to contain a complete base system or just enough to fetch the
remainder of the base system from the net?
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Disfear - The Horns
* SynrG notes that the number of configu
-i daily CD builds.
>
> Indeed; you're right. I was confusing both. Thanks :-)
Please can somebody confirm which multi-arch netinst images I should be
testing to ensure I am testing this alpha1 release?
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Iron Monkey - OMI Bozu (Wisdom Of Choking)
Pe
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 03:41 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 08:50:45AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >There doesn't seem to have been a daily build since Monday.
> >http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html suggests they aren't
> >
There doesn't seem to have been a daily build since Monday.
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html suggests they aren't
being attempted and failing but rather just aren't happening.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Bus error -- driver executed.
signature.asc
Description: This
27;s a testing thing? I'm
installing a squeeze VM now to check.
powerpc is failing differently with
E: Couldn't find package firewire-core-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc-di
or
E: Couldn't find package floppy-modules-2.6.30-1-powerpc64-di
depending on the flavour.
Ian.
-
sed for Lenny and earlier */
console-data
console-common
console-tools
console-cyrillic
console-terminus
-# Used for Squeeze and onwards
+/* Used for Squeeze and onwards */
console-setup
pcmcia-cs
pcmciautils
--
Ian Campbell
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody
to do this but
the patch below seems like as good a place as any.
Ian.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e8f92a7..8bb72b2 100755
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ $(ADIR)/status:
@echo "Generating a fake status file for apt-get and apt-cache..."
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 16:42 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I will follow up shortly with a short series of patches which
> > introduces image "variants" to debian-cd and adds the Xen variant as an
> > option for i386 and a
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 11:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The amd64 netboot-xen which is already committed has the same problem --
> I'll fix that right away.
My mistake, it really is cdrom_gtk and netboot-gtk...
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
BOFH excuse #420:
Feature was not
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 11:32 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > diff --git a/installer/build/boot/x86/xen/xm-debian.cfg
> > b/installer/build/boot/x86/xen/xm-debian.cfg index d1d78e7..7c3ff51
> > 100644
> > --- a/installer/build
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 20:21 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Below is a patch for debian-installer to build cdrom-xen variants for
> > i386 and amd64. If nobody objects I would like to commit this to the
> > d-i repository.
>
>
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 19:41 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > So it's not quite as simple as I thought, this patch just leads to
> > other error messages later on.
>
> Suggest you compare commit r1911 which did the same f
uot;Conflicts") or
- ($type eq "Breaks")) {
+ ($type eq "Breaks") or
+ ($type eq "Enhances")) {
$$i++;
while ($lines->[$$i] =~ m/^\s{4}/) {
This patch just adds the generic support code:
* CONF.sh: Add $(VARIANTS) configuration variable.
* eash-build.sh: Add command line parameter to enable variants.
* Makefile: Define VARIANT_xxx when preprocessing package list.
* boot/?/common.sh: Add a function fo
There is currently only a single caller but soon I will be adding
another which does not want install.bat created.
The final output is unchanged after this change.
---
tools/boot/squeeze/boot-x86 |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/boot/squeeze/boot-
i386 Xen guests require a PAE (686-bigmem) kernel in order to
run. Therefore this variant includes the relevant installer kernel and
ramdisk in install.386/xen as well as suitable kernel udebs and proper
debs for the installed system.
amd64 Xen has no similar requirement but we include the kernels
ends|Replaces|Conflicts|Breaks";
+ my $types =
"(?:Pre)?Depends|Suggests|Recommends|Replaces|Conflicts|Breaks|Enhances";
my (@dep, @rec, @sug);
my ($type, $or, $elt);
--
Ian Campbell
There is no delight the equal of dread. As long as it is som
So it's not quite as simple as I thought, this patch just leads to other
error messages later on.
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 18:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> It seems that "apt-cache depends" recently (as of 0.7.22) started
> including Enhances lines in its output. Leading to:
---
easy-build.sh | 32 +++-
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/easy-build.sh b/easy-build.sh
index a0de9d0..b6ce3be 100755
--- a/easy-build.sh
+++ b/easy-build.sh
@@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ set -e
## See also CONF.sh for the meaning of variables u
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:13 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > This patch just adds the generic support code:
> >* CONF.sh: Add $(VARIANTS) configuration variable.
> >* eash-build.sh: Add command line paramet
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:08 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (No need to CC me on replies.)
Sorry about that.
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > show_usage() {
> > - echo "Usage: $(basename $0) [-d gnome|kde|lxde|xfce|light|all]
> > BC|NETINST|CD
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:45 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > I just tried it and it looks like the script is already not
> > dash-ready:
> > $ dash -x ./easy-build.sh -h
> > + set -e
> > + exp
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> I just tried it and it looks like the script is already not
> dash-ready:
> $ dash -x ./easy-build.sh -h
> + set -e
> + export CF=CONF.sh
> + . CONF.sh
> .: 1: CONF.sh: not found
I'm no expert but it loo
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 14:05 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > +while getopts d:h OPT ; do
>
> Is getopts also supported in dash?
I believe so.
I just tried it and it looks like the script is already not dash-ready:
$ dash -x ./easy-build
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:33 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > There is currently only a single caller but soon I will be adding
> > another which does not want install.bat created.
> > ---
> > tools/boot/squeeze/boot-x86 |5
makes sense if we never expect
either of those comment out thing to return.
Ian.
diff --git a/tools/boot/squeeze/boot-powerpc b/tools/boot/squeeze/boot-powerpc
index 213028a..25c74b6 100755
--- a/tools/boot/squeeze/boot-powerpc
+++ b/tools/boot/squeeze/boot-powerpc
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ if [ -n &q
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 07:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I will follow up shortly with[...]a patch to the nightly cron jobs
> which enables this variant for the i386+amd64+powerpc multiarch
> netinst image.
Here it is.
Is this sufficient to ensure this variant is enabled in the actual
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
