Bug#673975: debian-cd: documentation speaks of Debian GNU/Linux

Package: debian-cd Version: wheezy-DI-a1 kfreebsd-amd64 20120511-22:56 Severity: minor Hi! The documentation of the kfreebsd image speaks of that it being a "one disc in a set containing the Debian GNU/Linux distribution", which I higly doubt for the kfreebsd image. ;) Found it in README.h

Re: [Dctrl-tools-devel] Description-less packages file

Hey, * Joerg Jaspert [2011-11-03 22:39:02 CET]: > I just merged a patch from Ansgar to generate the Packages files without > the English description embedded inside them. Instead they are now > written into a new file, the "English Translation" file in > "main/i18n/Translation-en.bz2". They thu

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

Hi! * George Danchev [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]: > [libburnia story] I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't approve the changes you have outlined here. They sound pretty intrusive and like complete overhauls to me. Speaking with my backports team hat on, if the c

Re: blessing non-profit, worldwide CD vendors

Hi! * Stefano Zacchiroli [2010-07-28 18:00:23 CEST]: > [ please Cc:-me on replies, M-F-T set ] Erm, you also should put the lists into the M-F-T if you don't want mails to end up only in your mailbox but also on the lists. ;) > Hi guys, I'm in contact with the people behind >

Re: Squeeze, firmware and installation

* Kurt Roeckx [2010-05-24 16:43:23 CEST]: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Yup, definitely. We already have an "unofficial non-free" area on > > cdimage.debian.org which is where we've been pushing the firmware > > zip/tar.gz files already. I'll set up the extr

Re: Suggestion: Change the link names on http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/debian-installer/

* Frans Pop [2009-11-27 00:27:07 CET]: > On Thursday 26 November 2009, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Why should users have to learn what Debian's internal name for their > > architecture is? > > Because that is what they see/need when they look at the sources.list or > package names? I have no po

Re: Dealing better with CD releases

Hi! * Steve McIntyre [2009-04-15 15:36:57 CEST]: > We then prune most of the old ISO images so we don't waste too much > space - older images can be recreated in the future using jigdo if > necessary. To the best of my knowledge that would depend on snapshot.debian.net being functional

Re: Update for W32 (WinXP) utility to burn ISO CDs

Hi! * Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-04 21:33]: > A Google search on "cd record iso" turned up the following link for a free, small > utility which > allows the direct burning of ISO files onto CD. There's no GUI interface, simply > right-click the > ISO file and select burn

Re: changes to Debian's web page

Hi! * Mejo Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 16:11]: > Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> Please read <http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/adding>. > > I have read it 100 times and tried to contact all the people I could > think of helping me. This is what I se

Re: changes to Debian's web page

* Mejo Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-17 17:08]: > Whom should I contact in order to get listed on Debian cd vendors page? > Please let me know. I have sent mails to a few guys at Debian, still > there's no reply. Please read . So long, Alfie -- Bz

Re: changes to Debian's web page

Hi! * Mejo Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 16:11]: > Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> Please read <http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/adding>. > > I have read it 100 times and tried to contact all the people I could > think of helping me. This is what I se

Re: changes to Debian's web page

* Mejo Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-17 17:08]: > Whom should I contact in order to get listed on Debian cd vendors page? > Please let me know. I have sent mails to a few guys at Debian, still > there's no reply. Please read . So long, Alfie -- Bz

Re: Tux CDs unreliable

Hi there! Sorry for me jumping in, but I guess it might be of value for you. * Tux CDs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-25 13:10]: > Our records indicate that this order was processed. It should have been > received. It was ordered with USPS First Class Mail, and is therefor > untracabl