Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 17 Jul 2012 11:37:50 +0200, a écrit :
> > I think I'd rather avoid uploading a new d-i at this point, and just
> > get new images built once the gnome bugs are fixed.
>
> Christian, maybe you could call for fixing the transl
(Adding the bug, dropping -release.)
Ian Campbell (17/07/2012):
> Installing from debian-wheezy-DI-b1-amd64-i386-netinst.iso in a Xen
> guest I get:
> ┌─┌┤ [!!] Configure the package manager ├┐┐
> │ │
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 14:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (17/07/2012):
> > some time to try kde/xfce/lxde/server installations, and possibly report
> > some more bugs. Given the images are going to be re-built at some point,
> > I think the pointer to the (known broken) images w
unarchive 614583
reopen 614583
severity 678066 normal
forcemerge 678066 614583
thanks
I've tested the proposed patch on a wide range of powerpc machines, it
works without issues. It will certainly remove confusion users face when
booting on 64-bit powerpc machines (see #614583). Thus reopening 61
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 614583
Bug #614583 {Done: Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>} [debian-cd] debian-cd:
Boot prompt for powerpc does not make install64 sufficiently prominent
Unarchived Bug 614583
> reopen 614583
Bug #614583 {Done: Steve McIntyre <93...@de
Cyril Brulebois (17/07/2012):
> some time to try kde/xfce/lxde/server installations, and possibly report
> some more bugs. Given the images are going to be re-built at some point,
> I think the pointer to the (known broken) images will be kept somewhere
> in #debian-boot's topic, to avoid confusio
Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 17 Jul 2012 11:37:50 +0200, a écrit :
> I think I'd rather avoid uploading a new d-i at this point, and just
> get new images built once the gnome bugs are fixed.
Christian, maybe you could call for fixing the translations of the
installation manual, so we can upload it to
Hi -boot/-cd,
Steve prepared candidate images for d-i beta 1, which I've started
testing in virtual machines. Unfortunately the default desktop install
(gnome) seems badly broken. So far, I didn't even manage to get a gdm3
prompt: #681830, #681837, #681855.
http://bugs.debian.org/681830
http:
8 matches
Mail list logo