Bug#619691: Provide lists of CD etc. contents

Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: wishlist Richard Atterer no longer maintains Jigdo or the search engine for files on Debian CDs. Please provide content lists in some form that can be linked from (now deleted; all links were dead) and

Debian Testing Weekly Build 3-14-2011 - No Kernel Modules Found

Apparently the 3-14-2011 weekly build of Debian Testing has a mismatched kernel. I'm getting the "No Kernel Modules Found" error. Thanks, --Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: Debian Testing Weekly Build 3-14-2011 - No Kernel Modules Found

p.s.--It is the AMD64 version that I'm having trouble with. Thanks, --Marc On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 19:03 -0400, Marc Hurst wrote: > Apparently the 3-14-2011 weekly build of Debian Testing has a mismatched > kernel. I'm getting the "No Kernel Modules Found" error. > Thanks, > --Marc > > > -- To

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> There are uses I've heard about, including (apparently quite common) >> using CDs and DVDs to seed a mirror on a Windows server. > >If I had to chose between that working, and not needing to worry about >filename l

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

John H. Robinson, IV wrote: >Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>Why's that? Isn't UDF widely supported? >> > >> > Implementations often widely differ in their limitations - see the >> > Wikipedia page for more details. The suggested way to make

Krajowe PRZESYLKI KURIERSKIE

Witamy serdecznie, Jesteśmy firmą zajmującą się pośrednictwem usług kurierskich w Polsce. Szanując Państwa prywatność i zarazem przestrzegając obowiązujących przepisów (Ustawa z dnia 18 lipca 2002 roku o świadczeniu usług drogą elektroniczną - Dz. U Nr 144, poz.1204) zwracamy się z prośbą o wyr

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>Why's that? Isn't UDF widely supported? > > Implementations often widely differ in their limitations - see the > Wikipedia page for more details. The suggested way to make a safe UDF > DVD is often along the lines of "use the ISO9660 bridge

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>64 is quite low. Is there no way to use longer filenames that still >>works on all required platforms? > > To do that, we'll have to switch to a different filesystem. That's a > possibility (maybe UDF), but there's probably even more of a ch

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

Hi, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:27:57PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > The longest is: > > libreoffice-presentation-minimizer_1.0.3+LibO3.3.1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb > > at 71. Good, then any bug against openoffice.org is not needed, as that obviously will be + wontfix wheezy-ignore, because it sim

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

Steve McIntyre wrote: > There are uses I've heard about, including (apparently quite common) > using CDs and DVDs to seed a mirror on a Windows server. If I had to chose between that working, and not needing to worry about filename lengths, I'd choose the latter. > >Is it possible to provide Joli

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:13:03PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>>64 is quite low. Is there no way to use longer filenames that still >>>works on all required platforms? >> >> To do that, we'll have to switch to a different filesystem. Th

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> users. The problem is that Joliet has a limit for filename length (64 >> characters), and technically we're already past that length. From >> genisoimage.1: > >64 is quite

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > users. The problem is that Joliet has a limit for filename length (64 > characters), and technically we're already past that length. From > genisoimage.1: 64 is quite low. Is there no way to use longer filenames that still works on all requ

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:52:35AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> I've noticed a problem recently in the archive when building CDs, >> aggravated to a certain extent by the newer source formats. Some of >> the filenames in the archive are getting *very* long, and this is >> causi

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

Steve McIntyre wrote: > I've noticed a problem recently in the archive when building CDs, > aggravated to a certain extent by the newer source formats. Some of > the filenames in the archive are getting *very* long, and this is > causing issues. As a matter of course, we build CDs with RockRidge an

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:17:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Debian LibreOffice Maintainers >>openoffice.org > >Dead. Any anything there is just transitional packages you need tor >squeeze->wheezy upgrades, so need t

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

Hi, On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:17:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Debian LibreOffice Maintainers >openoffice.org Dead. Any anything there is just transitional packages you need tor squeeze->wheezy upgrades, so need to stay. Is libreoffice also affected? >From your list it appears not...

Re: MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 02:17:06PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hey folks, > >I've noticed a problem recently in the archive when building CDs, >aggravated to a certain extent by the newer source formats. Some of >the filenames in the archive are getting *very* long, and this is >causing issues. A

MBF alert: packages with very long source / .deb filenames

Hey folks, I've noticed a problem recently in the archive when building CDs, aggravated to a certain extent by the newer source formats. Some of the filenames in the archive are getting *very* long, and this is causing issues. As a matter of course, we build CDs with RockRidge and Joliet support s

Sanjem saveejo davanu karti!...

i-virtuve (virtualaa) ienak, saprotams, ari juusu maajaas - izveido burgerus savaa kompii , bet apeed tos iistaa restoranaa! http://www.lidoburgers.info - tur viss ir! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@