Bug#348407: pine: security hole in imap support

2006-01-17 Thread Will Lowe
Vila wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Will Lowe wrote: > > > Package: pine > > Version: 4.62-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: user security hole > > > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/ says: > > > > Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later v

Bug#348407: pine: security hole in imap support

2006-01-16 Thread Will Lowe
Package: pine Version: 4.62-1 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole http://www.washington.edu/pine/ says: Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later version, to fix a buffer overflow problem. Read iDEFENSE Security Advisory for full details. The advisory is here: http://www.idefense.com/inte

Bug#466487: libauthen-smb-perl: should this package be orphaned or removed?

2008-02-19 Thread Will Lowe
Hi there, Original maintainer piping in. I definitely don't have the interest or time to maintain this package. Please mark it orphaned, or remove it from the archive. I suspect it's been quite a long time since anyone found it useful. Will Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Feb 19

Bug#466487: libauthen-smb-perl: should this package be orphaned or removed?

2008-02-20 Thread Will Lowe
It's all yours. Thanks much. On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:16 AM, Xavier Oswald wrote: Hi, I will take it. Im maintaining libauthen-simple-smb-perl which depends on libauthen- smb-perl. Thanks, -- ,''`. Xavier Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : GNU/LINUX Debian Maintainer `. `' GnuPG Key ID 0

Bug#466489: linneighborhood: should this package be orphaned?

2008-02-22 Thread Will Lowe
Please orphan. Or remove from the archive. As far as I know it's been dropped upstream for several years and there are better alternatives. On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:30 PM, Barry deFreese wrote: Package: linneighborhood Version: 0.6.5-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: prop