If versions in stable/unstable are affected, they should be marked so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You seem to use obsolete version of binutils. Testing and unstable have
2.17cvs20070426-8.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loïc Minier wrote:
>Known bug in libnet-dbus-perl; the workaround is to downgrade DBus.
Should DBus have dummy RC bug to prevent it from entering testing?
Source package nbio is removed from sid and lenny, so maybe this can be
closed if etch (stable) isn't affected?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixed 431131 1.3-2
thanks
You -done:d bug unversioned and didn't close it in changelog.
I mark it fixed in 1.3-2 as you said it's now fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
found 428293 4.17-5etch1
thanks
What's status of this bug?
DoS in 4.21-1 is still there too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:12:02PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > Adding a DisplaySize to the Monitor section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf
> > solved the problem.
> Since this seems a problem in your configuration files, i'm going to
> close the bug. If you find out something else a
Was this bug in gcc or glibc (or both)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What version of dpkg and its depends do you have installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Houghton wrote:
>It isn't fixed. The amd64 version still depends on libcurl4-gnutls
>which doesn't exist.
BinNMU for amd64 should fix this if package is binNMUable.
Please ask debian-release mailing list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
This bug can be closed if it's fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BinNMU for amd64 should fix this if package is binNMUable.
Please ask debian-release mailing list.
Same for libgnash0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 03:22:41AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> BinNMU for amd64 should fix this if package is binNMUable.
> Please ask debian-release mailing list.
> Same for libgnash0
Please ignore that. Seems that binNMU has been already made.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
reopen 434597
severity 434597 grave
#reassigning to yaird, you shouldn't close bugs too fast
reassign 434597 yaird 0.0.12-20
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
This bug has patch included, maybe security team could do upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this bug relevant any longer? It was reported against sarge and now
package name has changed to libapache2-mod-jk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could security team look at this and make upload for stable (and perhaps
oldstable)?
DoS in unstable is still there too, but that's perhaps different issue.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Why do you close this bug again? It's already closed a few times
>with the right version. Do you for some reason think it's not closed?
It wasnt closed, only tagged fixed (check BTS web log if in doubt).
(tag fixed should be needed only for NMUs)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it's decided that this dependency is OK then shouldn't this bug be
reassigned to nfs-common or ftp team (for raising nfs-common priority).
(and severity grave seems too much)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This issue is already fixed in 2.13~rc2-4
...
Recommend: nfs-common so that portmap doesn't become defacto-Required
...
So this bug can be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please tell udev version installed.
You are using 2.6.18-4-xen-686 kernel from etch? Is xen in use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 436651 grave
tags 436651 moreinfo
thanks
Armando, you seem to use version of gaim currently in testing
(beta5-11). Your apt setup is currently using stable only
(maybe you changed that recently).
Leaving system with some packages from newer releases that now won't be
updated anymore beca
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:48:45AM +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> On 8/7/07, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please tell udev version installed.
And please show mdadm version and configuration.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
- Forwarded message from James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#435983: mount: fails to detect LABEL=foo filesystems
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Please use the BTS "fixed" tag with care: it seems to override (not
> coexist with) a "done" tag for the same version.
>
> In this case the net result was that you reopened the bugreport, also
> for version 2.0.34 and newer.
What
You didn't ack NMU in your last upload, so BTS thinks this bug is still
there. If it's fixed, you should send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You didn't ack NMU in your last upload, so BTS thinks this bug is still
there. If it's fixed, you should send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could someone prepare update for unrar-nonfree to next etch point
release fixing security issues?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Version 4.2.1-6 didn't fix this bug. Errors are exactly the same.
Is 4.2.1-4 (in testing currently) buggy too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:33:16PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Sun May 20, 2007 at 17:29:19 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer
> > overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580
> >
Package: file
Version: 4.21-1
Followup-For: Bug #428293
Different issue, but here is information about DoS bug:
http://www.amavis.org/security/asa-2007-3.txt
-quote begin-
To check, if this issue has been properly fixed, please do
the following steps:
$ perl -e 'for (1..2700) {print "\n" x 10}'
This bug and the bug it's merged with are marked fixed (and are fixed
too most likely).
So maybe mail should be sent to -done (with version header) closing this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shouldn't releases containing security fixes be uploaded with higher
urgency than low?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Koch wrote:
>This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5
But this FTBFS build used 0.7.8-6. Is this bug reappeared?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your pcre3 (7.3-2) upload used wrong syntax for bug closing in
changelog. So maybe you should manually send (versioned) closing
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed that binary packages for i386 (compiled in maintainers system)
depend libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6)
This means etch system was used for building (instead of uptodate sid)
Maybe that causes some problems for i386 users.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Mathias Brodala wrote:
>Version: 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3
>Trying to start Icedove after upgradingt to GTK 2.12 fails with a segfault.
>Debugging output is attached.
>And no, I cannot (or do not want to) upgrade to Icedove 2.0.0.4 ATM because
>this way I’d lose both the Typeaheadfind and DOM inspectory ex
Have a look in bugs #181378 (+merged) and #439931
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xine: found demuxer plugin: mpeg pes demux plugin
video discontinuity #1, type is 0, disc_off 0
waiting for audio discontinuity #1
audio discontinuity #1, type is 0, disc_off 0
waiting for in_discontinuity update #1
vpts adjusted with prebuffer to 37691
av_offset=0 pts
spu_offset=0 pts
xine_play
pl
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
severity 437628 important
#etch version works only with php4
tags 437628 etch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libavutil version: 1d.49.3.0
libavcodec version: 1d.51.38.0
libavformat version: 1d.51.10.0
built on Jun 23 2007 14:31:53, gcc: 4.1.3 20070601 (prerelease) (Debian
4.1.2-12)
File formats:
E mpeg2video MPEG2 video
Codecs:
D VSDT mpeg2video
Doesn't this mean that mpeg2 encoder is di
reopen 443574
thanks
I think this bug should stay open for couple of days util fixed wxwidgets is
uploaded to prevent many programs from crashing in testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sash
Version: 3.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
NMU of this package appears to be no longer statically linked.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (950, 'testing'), (750, 'unstable'), (550, 'stable')
Architecture:
found 410580 1:3.5.2-0.1
thanks
According to http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/CVE-2007-0855
unrar in sarge and etch is vulnerable
As I understand, no updates by security team are done to nonfree
packages. But could update put into point release?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Package: flac
Version: 1.1.2-5
Severity: grave
1.1.2-6 was uploaded with priority high and should go to etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You seem to have at least coreutils, libc6 and libldap2 not in their latest
version in "testing". Try to update them (or apt-get/aptitude upgrade).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libltdl3
Version: 1.5.26-4+lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Libtool security update seems to have broken mpg123 (1.4.3-4). It can't find or
load output plugins. I don't know what package to blame but things should keep
working in stable.
-- System Informatio
Is #523475 and #517792 same bug? And is it still in 1.1.14-6 (lenny)?
Also #522811 seems unfixed too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
close 505699
thanks
Package is removed from sid/squeeze.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
close 526560
thanks
Package is removed from sid/squeeze.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi! I noticed that this bug has been reported against old version of
qpsmtpd. Maybe archive wide consistency check that you (Petter
Reinholdtsen) run got the version wrong?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:41:41PM +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> reassign 676729 gcc-4.7 4.7.0-12
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Christophe Prud'homme
> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I get an ice with gcc47 (see email below)
> >
> > I am trying to reproduce it.
> > Shouldn't it
Should this bug be marked fixed in version 0.6.21-4 if this is same bug as
#673185 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Maybe it helps to recompile this package with new compiler. gcc-4.7
releases after this package was last compiled, have fixed some issues
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I'm sorry for extra commands, exim4 or gnome-keyring has a bug (#676984)
that made me think that bts command failed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #678254
This happens because:
Changes:
fdupes (1.50-PR2-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sandro Tosi ]
* debian/patches/50_bts284274_hardlinkreplace.dpatch
- disabled, since it's losing data if files are on different
- filesystems;
thanks to Mike Hommey for
Package: fdupes
Followup-For: Bug #677419
It's wrong to remove this useful option, removing causes FTBFS #678254
So -L should be fixed to fail gracefully instead
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Package: libffado
Version: 2.0.99+svn2163-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Please look at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libffado
2.0.99+svn2163 fails to build on powerpc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
Looks like patch came from Nicolas Bourdaud, not from Lucas Nussbaum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
psmisc seems to build fine now, you should close this bug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Nathan, please fix your build environment.
Looks like that binNMU is needed again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.106
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs
> prompt comes before the
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> -- /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md50 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sde1[5]
> 625137664 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
> bitmap: 1/3 pages [4KB], 65536K
BTS thinks that this bug affects only unstable and stable? (no wheezy).
However tags are "wheezy sid experimental".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
If this bug is now fixed with version 4.3.0-3 , it can be marked so and
closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:54:51PM +0100, Ingo wrote:
> Since 2 weeks I an running kernel 3.4 from kernel.org. I used config from
> Debian's 3.4.4-1~experimental.1 with "make silentoldconfig" and accepted
> defaults fo 5 new items. This is a long term kernel as well and thus
> still maintained.
>
Do you know if this bug "policycoreutils: /usr/bin/sandbox "Invalid
argument" error" affects also wheezy version (2.1.10-1)?
If so, then maintainers should update BTS status so that it knows this isn't
regression. This bug prevents policycoreutils from migrating to testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
tag 672678 patch
thanks
This bug blocks lvm2 from migrating to testing. Maybe cryptmount should
temporarily removed from testing? Or are tools wrong, and lvm2 update
don't make situation any worse than it's now?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:31:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> This bug blocks lvm2 from migrating to testing. Maybe cryptmount should
> temporarily removed from testing? Or are tools wrong, and lvm2 update
> don't make situation any worse than it's now?
Has release
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:01:47PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> The attached patch brings vmlinuz from about 13MB to about 9.5MB, which
> is well under the 12MB limit. Downside is that xz compressing is
> noticeably slower than currently used gzip, but decompressing speed
> difference is not noti
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 07:05 AM, Touko Korpela wrote:
> >> ...
> >> +if test "$post_2_6_38"; then
> >> + XZ="xz --check=crc32 -8"
> >> +else
> >> + XZ=f
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:47:39AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Looks like this bug belongs to sourcepackage snappy, not binary snappy
> (src:snappy-player).
While this bug (#679964) is reported against binary package snappy
BTS shows this wrong? information:
Package: snappy; Maintain
Looks like this bug belongs to sourcepackage snappy, not binary snappy
(src:snappy-player).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:02:43PM -0600, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:59:34 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > sbuild-build-depends-libio-async-perl-dummy : Depends: perl (>= 5.15.6)
> > > but 5.14.2-12 is to be installe
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:17PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > Upstream support is irrelavant for this bug.
> Nope it is not..
>
> in fact this situation was exactly the same for the last two debian
> releases... lustre didn't support the standard kernel in these
> releases.
> th
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Source: meta-gnome3
> Version: 1:3.4+1
> Severity: serious
>
> Due to additional dependencies that were added recently, the gnome meta
> packages are no longer installable on all architectures:
>
> > gnome/armel unsatisfiable Depend
Is this "modifying files from another package" (found by piuparts) bug
specific to 1:2.22-1.1 NMU version or is it also present in 1:2.22-1?
If it isn't NMU spesific then BTS version tracking should let know it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
When fixing this bug, #563935 and #583881 (GCC workarounds for long time
fixed bugs) should be fixed too. They are about sparc and armel arcs.
Now this package is compiled unoptimized in these arcs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
found 668815 0.3-3.1
notfound 668815 0.3-3.2
thanks
fixing typo in reported package version...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Good to see some action in old bugs too.
0.53-3.1 NMU has your name in maintainer field, is it intentional?
Also last "found" message to control@b.d.o caused bug versioning mess.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:31:48AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hello RT,
>
> I'm hereby requesting permission to upload a fix for wicd to p-u, bug #668397
> (CCed), CVE-2012-2095. "g
Installer has also a bug report about this (#661069).
It would be good if Debian kernel radeon driver learned to fall back
sensibly if running on hardware where firmware is required.
Also installer should warn user about what happens if firmware is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
82 matches
Mail list logo
