Hi,
may I kindly ask why you keep on uploading new versions, while being
fully aware that there is no way at all to make them even start?
In case you wonder: I have a locally built Anki version where I patched
out the QT version check. That works well enough for me. Your uploads
are replacing thi
HI Salvatore,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags 852627 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for lcms2 (versioned as 2.8-3.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Sorry, I
e16d58fd5eee66d96d0f31b730eca299157f109a
Author: Thomas Weber
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:04:40 2017 +0100
Debian release 2.8-4
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 309a388..602f838 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lcms2 (2.8-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New patch
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:27:43AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> HI Salvatore,
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:44:49PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags 852627 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for lcms2 (ver
Hi Bastian,
Am Donnerstag, den 01.06.2006, 09:28 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank:
> > Octave is required. Please install Octave and rerun cmake.
> > -- Configuring done
> > make: *** [cmake-stamp] Error 255
I'm about to send a mail to several buildd admins, so you beat me to.
Can you please verify
Package: star
Version: 1.5a57-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1 -- DFSG issue
In the upload of 1.5a57-1, the license was changed from GPL to CDDL
(with choice of venue being Berlin, Germany). The acceptance of this
license by Debian is still undecided [1] (at least to the best of my
> Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You are neither the submitter of the bug nor the package's maintainer.
> > Please read
hmm, somehow the above (quoted) mail reached Joerg Schilling, but not the BTS. I
give it here for reference (
Hi,
> In order to fix this a symlink
> /usr/lib/liboctaviz.so -> /usr/lib/octave-2.1.67/liboctaviz.so
> needs to be created.
This is a known bug. A fixed package is available from the website of
the Debian Octave Group.
http://pkg-octave.alioth.debian.org/
(the red rectangle)
Regards
Th
Gustavo Franko has posted a workaround to debian-devel.
===
There's a workaround that is run the application as follows:
$ G_SLICE=always-malloc application
===
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Steve,
Am Freitag, den 14.04.2006, 21:57 -0400 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> Package: octave2.1
> Version: 1:2.1.73-6
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> Octave fails to run,
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>octave2.1: error while loading shared libraries: liblapack.so.3: cannot
> open shared ob
Am Montag, den 17.04.2006, 10:52 -0400 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> Ah. I wondered if that was the case. I found the alternatives for
> liblapack2, but not for liblapack3 when when I checked earlier, but
> let's see what your commands bring ...
Do you have any atlas2 packages installed (especiall
Am Montag, den 17.04.2006, 12:25 -0400 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
>
> > If yes, you should purge them and install atlas3-base-dev.
> >
> > If that doesn't help, please post the output of
> >
> > $ dpkg -l '*atlas*' '*lapack*'
Thanks for that. So, one last shot: can you post
/etc/ld.so.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.04.2006, 15:42 -0400 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/ld.so.conf
> /usr/local/lib
> /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d
> /usr/X11R6/lib
> What are we looking for now?
A line like
/usr/lib/atlas
in this file. Something went wrong with the update of this file
(n
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 01:25 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> It seems that you did not understand the Debian rules.
Well, I believe I understand them quite well. OTOH, I don't consider
this problem to be about my understanding, so let's drop this.
> If Debian would really require people to
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 01:25 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > It seems that you did not understand the Debian rules.
> >
> > Well,
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 22:24 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Well, then you obviously need to remove _all_ GPL packets as any
> person could sue you anywhere in the world because of the _missing_
> choice of venue.
If I am not doing business there and can still be sued *without* having
agre
Am Dienstag, den 14.02.2006, 20:29 +0100 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Note: the CDDL clearly is a license that follows the rules from Debian.
See, that's exactly the point. I believe otherwise; so it isn't clear to
me, at least with a choice of venue.
> If you believe otherwise, tell me exactly _
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:18:50PM -, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> Well, what sort of reacion do you expect?
A sign that you are reading the bug report, which wasn't obvious to me.
Something along the lines of "I agree / I disagree / I don't know" would be nice
as well. After all, it might be poss
Package: vtk
Followup-For: Bug #346505
Tags: patch
The attached patches should fix this one (two patches: control.patch should
solve the xlibs-problem, but without rules.patch I couldn't build the package in
a pbuilder environment).
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstabl
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
iam-ma-010:~# apt-get install cupsys
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
cupsys-driver-gimpprint foomatic-bin xpdf-korean xpdf-japanese
xpdf-chinese-traditio
package libinline-octave-perl
tags 391062 + unreproducible
severity 391062 important
thanks
I can't reproduce this. I'm downgrading the severity for the moment.
Bhaskar, can you try the examples from
/usr/share/doc/libinline-octave-perl/examples/
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUB
Package: ginac
Severity: serious
Hi,
please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ginac&ver=1.3.5-2&arch=arm&stamp=1160247427&file=log&as=raw
Regards
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package: octave2.1
tags 464334 unreproducible
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: octave2.1
> Version: 1:2.1.73-16
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> In a clean chroot:
>
> Setting up octave2.1 (1:2.1.73-16) ...
> ls: cannot access /usr/share/octave/3
Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 06/02/08 at 10:59 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > package: octave2.1
> > tags 464334 unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> >
On 03/01/08 10:56 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 3.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> panic: Segmentation fault -- stopping myself...
> attempting to save variables to `octave-core'...
> save to `octave-core' complete
> Segmentation fault
This turns out to be a toolchain
Am Donnerstag, den 02.08.2007, 19:14 -0700 schrieb Phil Miller:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 1:2.9.13-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 7.2
>
> As the subject says, the just uploaded version of octave2.9, 1:2.9.13-1,
> declares a Depends on libcurl4 >= 7.16.2-1.
Thanks for your bu
Package: rawstudio
Version: 0.6+20071101-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ rawstudio
Segmentation fault
Re-building without optimization and with debug symbols yields the attached
backtrace.
Thanks
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefe
Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 08:18 -0700 schrieb Wesley J. Landaker:
> Subject: octplot: doesn't work at all
> Package: octplot
> Version: 0.4.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> octplot doesn't work at all.
>
> 1) It doesn't automatically get into octave's path,
package: octaviz
severity 452436 normal
tags 452436 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 22.11.2007, 21:12 + schrieb =?UTF-8?Q?
Jo=C3=A3o?= Franco:
> Package: octaviz
> Version: 0.4.5-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
I can't reproduce this with the cu
The following message was sent by Andrey Melnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I'm
resending it to the BTS as his message doesn't appear there at the time
of writing.
I confirm that his patch indeed fixes the segfault.
> Package: rawstudio
> Followup-For: Bug #452389
>
> Attached patch fixes this segfa
Am Donnerstag, den 03.01.2008, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Soeren Sonnenburg:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 3.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> just try
>
> echo version | octave
>
> or
>
> octave
>
> on an arm machine:
>
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux arm 2.6.18-4-versatile #1 Sun Jun 17 14:34:28 UTC 2007 ar
Am Samstag, den 05.01.2008, 10:14 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 21:53]:
>
> > In order to investigate why Octave 3.0 is failing to work on arm
> > (Bug#458852, severity grave), I would need octave3.0_3.0.0-1 installed on a
> > sid chroot o
on loading
> > > dispatch.oct. This could be enough info for upstream to fix it.
> >
> > Thomas Weber has forwarded your message to bug-octave and John Eaton replied
> > to it [1] and gave the following suggestion:
> >
> >Have you tried building with -O0?
gnuplot 4.2.0-4 built fine on all architectures. Is there any reason
this bug should stay open? Gnuplot is not entering testing with it.
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dann,
Am Freitag, den 27.07.2007, 16:37 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
> Severity: serious
> Version: 4.2.0-3
> Package: gnuplot
>
> From
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=gnuplot&ver=4.2.0-3&arch=ia64&stamp=1179477747&file=log:
4.2.0-4 built fine on all architectures. Since I'm neither
Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 23:04 +0200 schrieb Patrick Winnertz:
> Package: octave2.9
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Package content changed
> Version: 1:2.9.13-1
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-debdiff
>
> Hi,
This bug is triggered by a normal installation with emacs22. It works
with emacs21 however.
Package is dead upstream, maintainer seems MIA.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:15:40PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> >>>>> TW == Thomas Weber [2008-10-21]
>
> TW> Package is dead upstream, maintainer seems MIA.
>
> Maintainer is here and reads what you write.
Sorry then, I thought your latest upload w
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:15:07PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]:
>
> > Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> > >
3.8.0 (no changes
needed)
* added myself to the uploaders list.
[ Thomas Weber ]
* New patch: patches/no-nan-values
Error out in case of NaN values, they are not
supported by VTK (closes: 480431)
I didn't remove the standards bum
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: octave-vrml
> Version: 1.0.6-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
>
> When calling a vrml function from octave the error
> sh: freewrl: command not found
> cmd = freewrl/tmp/octave_vrml_output.wr
Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: octave-vrml
> > Version: 1.0.6-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 3.5
> >
> > When calling a vrml
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Package: octave-vrml
> > > Version: 1.0.6-2
> > > S
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 09:15 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 22:30 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber:
> > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 06:30:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
On 20/04/08 18:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: matwrap
> Version: 0.57-10
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
>
package matwrap
severity 477041 important
thanks
On 27/04/08 10:38 +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On 20/04/08 18:03 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: matwrap
> > Version: 0.57-10
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20
Hi Lucas,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2008, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: octave-epstk
> Version: 2.2-10
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080506 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
this error is real, but not due to the different gcc versions.
On 02/08/08 23:18 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Saturday 02 August 2008 13:09:23 ?lafur Jens Sigur?sson wrote:
> > This works fine for me on an i386 machine with a sid pbuilder.
> >
> > The error that you are getting implies that the octave-nan package is
> > not getting installed (the octave-
On 03/08/08 10:23 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> OK, I've posted those files at http://math.berkeley.edu/~schepler/octave-nan/
> .
Sorry, 403 on all files. Can you check the permissions?
> Some possibly relevant information: the chroot is set up with /bin/sh
> pointing
> to dash, and the pbui
On 03/08/08 10:40 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:34:45 Thomas Weber wrote:
> > On 03/08/08 10:23 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > OK, I've posted those files at
> > > http://math.berkeley.edu/~schepler/octave-nan/ .
> >
> >
package octplot
reassign 470327 fltk1.1
found 1.1.8~rc1-2
thanks
Hi Aaron,
fltk-config outputs several lines instead of one when called as
$ fltk-config --use-gl --libs
which makes it difficult to use the output in further commands. The
problem is in the "if" part, starting at line 319
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2008, 11:05 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-11 09:42]:
>
> > package octplot
> > reassign 470327 fltk1.1
> > found 1.1.8~rc1-2
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
>
package: octave-symbolic
tag 512075 confirmed
fixed 512075 1.0.7-1
thanks
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:20:47AM +, Steve Cotton wrote:
> 1. octave-symbolic is missing a dependency on libginac1.4
>
> 2. Even with libginac1.4 installed, Octave doesn't find the
> library without the help of
> exp
Attached the diff between upstream's 1.0.6 and 1.0.7. I'll ask the
release-team about the preferred solution (either patching or uploading
the new upstream version).
Thomas
1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:14:50PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Attached the diff between upstream's 1.0.6 and 1.0.7. I'll ask the
> release-team about the preferred solution (either patching or uploading
> the new upstream version).
Okay, we are clear from debian-release
package octave3.0
tags 513576 confirmed
tags 513576 upstream
forwarded 513576
http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-February/010599.html
thanks
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 04:09:06PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I guess octave3 could just provide the
>
> /usr/share/octave/
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 05:47:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.5-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi
>
> The postinst of octave3.0 seems to hang on at least the mipsel buildds (for
> unstable) [1].
>
> This issue blocks the buildds from building any other package till t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> Arch: i386
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just realized that I can multiply a real 2x2 matrix by a complex vector.
Uh, yes. Why shouldn't this work? Or in other words, how do you
distingu
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:35:01AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Thomas Weber [2009-04-22 23:04]:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> > > Package: octave3.0
> > > Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> > > Arch: i386
> > >
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:04:14PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> > Package: octave3.0
> > Version: 1:3.0.1-7
> > Arch: i386
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just rea
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> you was right, my problem is inthe atlas library:
Thanks for the follow-up.
>
> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib /usr/bin/octave -q --eval '[1 2; 3 4] * [1; 1i]'
> ans =
>1 + 2i
>3 + 4i
>
> $ lmt-linux ~ $ /usr/bin/o
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:31:32PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Just for the record, I see the same problem on an amd64 system (Intel
> EM64T chip).
Is this a normal installation or as part of a build process?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:30:59AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Package: octave3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.4~rc5-2
> Severity: serious
>
> This version of the octave3.0 package is based on a release candidate
> snapshot for the upcoming 3.0.4 version. The upstream authors have told
> us [1] that
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:19:19PM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 9-Apr-2009, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> | Hi Rafael, thanks for the forthcoming fix to the problem.
> |
> | About the severity, I appreciate you need to get the new version across
> | to testing but I don't think I could justify it
package octave-symbolic
severity 516942 normal
tags 516942 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:20:23PM +0100, Oz N wrote:
> Package: octave-symbolic
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi, I have installed octave symbolic from 'experimenta
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:13:23AM -0400, Jason Riedy wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> > octave: error while loading shared libraries: libumfpack.so.3.2.0: cannot
> > open shared object file: No such file or director
Hi Aurelien,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: octave3.2-headers
> Version: 3.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> # apt-get install octave3.2-headers
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading sta
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:32:28PM +0200, br...@ira.uka.de wrote:
> Hi,
> recompiling the package (apt-get source octave3.2 etc.) fixes the problem.
That's a work-around, not a fix (well, the original code we introduced
is already a work-around).
I'm working on a better solution, but I need to as
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:24:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thomas Weber a écrit :
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> Package: octave3.2-headers
> >> Version: 3.2.0-2
> >> Severity: gr
Hi,
Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2007 21:38 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 2.9.9-8
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying to build octave2.9-forge version 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7 (on amd64)
> I get the following error:
That bug is triggered by the fix for #410070.
Can you look
Am Montag, den 27.11.2006, 18:15 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > We will upload a package of either octplot or semidef-oct which triggers
> > the bug, so there's something to point to.
>
> > These packages have the advantage of
> > - no reported bugs and an up-to-date version in testing and
>
Hi Bill,
Am Freitag, den 24.11.2006, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> Package: octave2.1-forge
> Version: 2006.03.17+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
> Jusitification: FHS violation
>
> Hello Debian Octave Group,
>
> The ia64 package includes a top-level directory ./octave2.1-forge/
>From the
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.11.2006, 21:00 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, den 24.11.2006, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > > Package: octave2.1-forge
> > > Version: 2006.03.17+d
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 26.11.2006, 15:05 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > Please fix your package instead to fail to build when there is a problem
> > > with octave-config, instead of misbuilding in this fashion.
>
> > Yes, and then?
>
> And then the bug in octave2.1-forge is fixed, and there's
Hi,
okay, here is some sort of current status:
In order to migrate to VTK 5, we will probably need a CVS snapshot of
Octaviz (which in itself doesn't pose a problem). If you try to build
this, you will run into a bug similiar to [1].
The reason for this can be found in
/usr/lib/vtk-5.0
Hi,
okay, here we go (in order to avoid people at BSPs wasting time).
Preliminary (i386) packages are at
deb http://www.num.uni-sb.de/~weber/debian unstable/
These are very preliminary (the changelog entries are not really
accurate, but Octaviz is not a package where I want to interr
Package: octave2.9
Version: 2.9.10-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
Debian, so it shouldn't enter testing in the current state.
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
package octaviz
tags 419683 confirmed
thanks
Am Dienstag, 17. April 2007 14:22 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> CMake Error: VTK not found. Set the VTK_DIR cmake cache entry to the
> directory containing VTKConfig.cmake. This is either the root of the build
> tree, or PREFIX/lib/vtk for an installatio
package octplot
tags 423994 confirmed
thanks
Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2007 11:01:04 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
> failed to build on i386.
Adding
-lGLU
fixes this. Now, if only I knew how to add this to configure.ac ...
Package: octave2.9
reassign 410463 octave2.9-forge
thanks
Am Samstag, den 10.02.2007, 21:38 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> error: invalid matrix index = 1
> error: evaluating assignment expression near line 158, column 12
> error: evaluating if command near line 156, column 3
> error: called from `t
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.164
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I attach a log file of a script session. The commands were
=
export LANG=C
aptitude install pbuilder
cp /etc/pbuilderrc /etc/pbuilderrc.bak
echo >> /etc/pbuilderrc.ba
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> It looks like octave3.2 is hitting a ld bug:
> | g++ -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,liboctinterp.so -o liboctinterp.so [...]
> | /usr/bin/ld: non-dynamic relo
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 07:35:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.1.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Sébastien,
any chance of disabling the longer running tests? Or having them print
out something every few
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:32:53AM +0100, Michael Weitzel wrote:
> Package: octave3.2
> Version: 3.2.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> During installation the Octave 3.2 package does not create the directory
> /usr/share/oct
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:50:13AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: octave-ga
> Version: 0.9.7-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-02-24 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> Thomas Weber writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> It looks like building without -g might work around the problem, so
> >> removing
>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:24:25PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:38:18AM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Thomas Weber writes:
> > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:24:39PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > >> It looks like b
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.0.4-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Start Time: 20090927-1023
>
> [...]
>
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), octave3.2-headers (>= 3.2
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 05:25:42PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Source: dynare
> > Version: 4.0.4-4
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There was an error while trying to
/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+h5utils (1.12-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Switch to octave3.2-headers
+
+ -- Thomas Weber Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:11:50 +
+
h5utils (1.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed build-dep in libhdf4-dev instead of libhdf4g-dev.
diff --gi
I didn't actually test it, but
http://pear.php.net/package/Log/download/
indicates that the 1.12.0 version of Pear Log fixes this.
However, php-log is orphaned.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:06:52PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the soname bump of libmagickcore, I now have #573972:
>
> > pyxplot explicitly depends on libmagickcore2-extra, which no longer exists
> > after the recent imagemagick upload to unstable; it's been replaced b
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:27:15PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tag 572265 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:01:40 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> > I didn't actually test it, but
> > http://pear.php.net/package/Log/download/
> > indicates tha
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > octave-specfun is currently uninstallable in sid, as it depends on
> > libhdf5-1.8.3, while octave3.2 depends on libhdf5-1.8.4.
> > Please rebuild octave-specfun against libhdf5-1.8.4.
>
> Actually, on further inspection,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:06:24AM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 1-Feb-2010, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> | On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> | > Hi!
> | >
> | > > octave-specfun is currently uninstallable in sid, as it depends o
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:03:20PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi John!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > No, it hasn't changed. All .oct files depend on liboctinterp, which
> > depends on liboctave and a number of other libraries, and liboctave
> > depends on libcruft and a number of other libraries. So
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: dynare
> Version: 4.0.4-6
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091213 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package faile
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:43:04AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:31:19AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: dynare
> > Version: 4.0.4-6
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091213 qa-
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:31:35AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > [Lucas, do you want to be kept in CC?]
> >
> > Alright, this is indeed a change in TexLive, and an intended one. See
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2009/12/msg00630.html
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-mai
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:55:58AM -0600, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Package: octave-symbolic
> Version: 1.0.9-1+b1
> Severity: grave
>
> octave-symbolic is largely unusable. Calling any of its functions
> other than "sym" results in C++ exceptions like this one:
>
> error: T& Array::c
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
