Unfortunately I won't be able to do it until August but anyone feel free to do
an NMU.
My apologies. Best regards,
Thomas
On 21 July 2023 07:04:57 GMT+08:00, alpha_one_x86
wrote:
>Fixed into the last version, please update to Ultracopier 2.2.6.7
Hi Moritz,
I've filled #962985 and #962986. I don't see why these library packages should
be kept without reverse dependency.
Best regards,
Thomas.
Thanks, much appreciated. Feel free to upload it right away.
Best regards,
Thomas
On 10 September 2023 09:12:35 WEST, Marcos Talau wrote:
>Control: tags 1037878 + patch
>Control: tags 1037878 + pending
>
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared an NMU for ultracopier (versioned as 2.2.6.0-1.1) and
>
I'm not familiar with dpkg-divert so I could mistake but it seems it doesn't
work as your script except since dpkg-divert with /usr/share/man/man8/cfdisk
doesn't display anything while dpkg-divert with
/usr/share/man/man8/cfdisk.8.gz does display something (see below)
# dpkg -S /usr/share/man/
I made some tests and it seems it comes from another part of xserver-xorg but
I still don't know which one (evdev or the core xorg ?). I purged synaptics
and the problem still happen with the additional mouse (package xserver-xorg-
input-mouse is still installed).
I forgot to mention that even i
Package: grub-common
Version: 1.98~20091221-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Line 40 function osx_entry is defined as followed : function osx_entry {
This is a bashism and should be corrected to osx_entry() {
--- etc/grub.d/30_os-prober 2009-12-21 22:34:4
-march=native is only supported for (Intel 386 and AMD x86-64)-like targets. A
simple solution would be to just disable this flag. Another option would be to
populate CPPFLAGS in debian/rules with -march=native depending on the output
of dpkg-architecture and the value of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
si
I searched explicitely for user locking but of course it's the
case for any shared (among arch) resources modified/removed on purge.
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le dimanche 6 janvier 2013 17:09:48, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> [Adding multiarch-devel to CC for a comment on point 3.]
>
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:50:35PM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Ah yes sorry. I searched explicitely for user locking but of course it's
&g
+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-01-21 22:26:19.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-8) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Avoid unnecessary prompt if configuration files have not been modified by
+the user (Closes: 698580).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Mon, 21 Jan 201
Package: ultracopier
Version: 0.2.0.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Version 0.2.0.16 of ultracopier contains in its src/styles
subdirectories some images. Some of them are distributed under a free
license but with README forbidding commercial use (src/styles/IcOs
ug in exim (either because it doesn't handle the
error correctly at all or because only default configuration doesn't handle
it).
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
tags 644392 - moreinfo
severity 644392 grave
thanks
Only raising severity to grave as the data loss only happen with exim and not
by default: users need to uncomment a line in dspam.conf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
herry-pick patch from upstream to recommend using -oi when using dspam
+with exim (Closes: #644392).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:25:43 +0800
+
dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply patch from upstream to use POSIX::ctime() instead of deprecated
diff -N
(Closes: #644392).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:25:43 +0800
+
dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply patch from upstream to use POSIX::ctime() instead of deprecated
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/dspam-documents/exim4/dspam.conf dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/d
tag 537622 + pending
thank you
I got a patch for this issue. I just have to comment it so that I'll
understand it in the future. I'll make an upload within 1 week.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi all,
the bug is already fixed and the patch have been merged upstream. I'm just
waiting for my sponsor to upload the package which shouldn't take long.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
package.
>
> The RFH sent a few months ago is still valid, and I am happy to co-maintain
> the project with whoever is interested (Thomas, still there?).
Still there yes but pretty busy with personnal stuff lately. Will try to do a
bit of bug triaging / fixing this WE. Feel free to ping me from time to time
when I don't give news.
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
Cheers,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: sid squeeze
Justification: fails to build from source
tcc has never built on armel due to a failure in the test suite. Could
you replace the current line for tcc by this one:
%tcc: i386 kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 # C com
Indeed, and the law stating this can be found in english at [1]. It's the
article L. 113-9 (last one on the page)
[1] http://195.83.177.9/code/liste.phtml?lang=uk&c=36&r=2495#art9764
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
It seems gpmudmon-applet is lacking a build-dependency on libgnome2-dev.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I've just come across this bug report — I probably unsuscribe from tcc by
mistake — but there is a patch in progress. Should be ready by 2011-07-05.
Best regards.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
close 633495 0.9.25-8
thanks
Problem lied in array_test which was defined with one parameter but called
without parameter. This issue is fixed in 0.9.25-8 and the problem will be
reported upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
close 605154 5.1.3-12
thanks
Salome was removed from Debian [1].
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/salome/news/20120126T112738Z.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
close 589864 5.5.26-5
thanks
Tomcat 5.5 is no longer part of Debian and according to the submitter this bug
doesn't affect tomcat6.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
close 590301 22.3+1-1
thanks
emacs22 has been removed from Debian. The issue is fixed in emacs23 according
to [1]
[1] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-0825
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
close 555668 0.2.2-2-rm
thanks
Package has been removed from Debian and is only part of oldstable now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
to this, as this both keeps unsafe versions of
> subversion in kfreebsd, but also prevents the set of subversion updates for
> all archs to be included into point releases.
Could it be related to [1]?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/lang/ruby18/files/patch-
ext_socket_socket.
d above.
I'll find a DD to do an NMU in case you don't have the time to do the upload
yourself. As recommanded by devref, I took care of only fixing this issue,
All the best,
Thomas Preud'homme
diff -u latex-xcolor-2.11/debian/rules latex-xcolor-2.11/debian/rules
--- latex-xcolor-2
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.26~git20110616.330d2ee-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
tcc consider the location of dynamic linker to decide the location of
crt*.o files. Since the dynamic linker is located at
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 on Debian, it searches
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.26~git20120104.83d57c0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending
Justification: Fails to build from source
tcc fails to build from source on armel because it compiles
unconditionally tccasm.c even if inline assembly is not supported for
this architecture (CONFIG_TCC_ASM und
elog 2012-01-17 23:38:23.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.25.dfsg1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Stop relying on the structure of debugging package (Closes: #653725).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:36:09 +0100
+
cyrus-s
mpat.h and writeffmpeg.c
since it is no longer included in libavutil/avutil.h
Author: Thomas Preud'homme
Origin: vendor
Forwarded: no
Last-Update: 2012-01-19
---
--- blender-2.61.orig/intern/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_compat.h
+++ blender-2.61/intern/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_compat.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include
#inc
close 633896 0.9.26~git20110616.330d2ee-2
thanks
tcc 0.9.26~git20110616.330d2ee-2 contains a fix for this issue and builds now
fine on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (see [0] and [1]).
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=tcc&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=0.9.26%7Egit20110616.330d2ee-2&stamp=1310766
Source: tcc
Version: 0.9.25-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1
>From tcc 0.9.25-8 tcc sets ELF interpreter in generated binary with
multiarch path (eg. /lib64/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 on
amd64). This breaks ELF ABI and violate policy per §9.1.1 (section about
FHS).
-- Sy
I got the same problem a few minutes ago and it got solved by upgrading from
1:3.4.6-2 to 1:3.5.2~rc2-1
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
extension point is now deprecated, see commit
9b262f1c5fe5a6fd879f17cd7b80d8c54e33d80c in upstream glib git repository. A
possible temporary solution would be to remove -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED from
libgiofm_la_CFLAGS in src/Makefile.am. However, since it's just an extension
(if I read it correct
Greetings Sergey,
I looked at the version 1.3.3.13.dfsg~svn20081228-2+b2 of scribus you seem to
be using and it is correctly linked against libtiff.so.4. Maybe you are using a
local installation of scribus. Could you provide the result of which scribus?
Best regards.
signature.asc
Description
The bug comes from linux/socket.h (included by linux/if.h) don't define struct
sockaddr anymore (it seems to be stripped from the linux include/linux/if.h by
excluded everything between #ifdef __KERNEL__ and #endif). According to [0] it
is not going to be reverted and the software needs to cope
Le jeudi 7 février 2013 06:48:48, Arnaud Fontaine a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> Seems to be the same issue as #693472.EMMS Depends against
> emacsen-common should probably be tightened to >= 2.0.5.
I managed to reproduce the bug in pbuilder and then tried this fix but it
didn't work.
tags 655969 + patch
thanks
Le samedi 26 janvier 2013 19:22:23, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:34:08AM +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > Thanks for the notice, while I don't exactly share that severity
> > classification (although that is of course covered by the
@@
+lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Avoid prompt when conffiles are not modified (Closes: #655969).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:24:27 +0100
+
lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Sven Mueller ]
diff -Nru lirc-0.9.0
(0.9.0~pre1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Avoid prompt when conffiles are not modified by the system administrator
+(Closes: #655969).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:24:27 +0100
+
lirc (0.9.0~pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Sven Mueller ]
Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 03:32:29, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On Thursday 07 March 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > tags 655969 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Le samedi 26 janvier 2013 19:22:23, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> > > O
[Note to RT: this is about adding a wheezy-ignore tag for #655969]
Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 17:27:33, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> Hi
>
> On Friday 08 March 2013, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le vendredi 8 mars 2013 03:32:29, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann a écrit :
> […]
2-06-21 09:29:54.0 +0200
+++ cogl-1.10.2/debian/changelog 2013-03-10 21:12:33.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+cogl (1.10.2-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add conflict in gir1.2-cogl-1.0 with gir1.0-clutter-1.0 to ensure dpkg
+will not unpack them at the same
Le lundi 11 mars 2013 07:37:48, vous avez écrit :
> Package: libdspam7-drv-pgsql
> Version: 3.10.2+dfsg-7
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
> per definition of the releas
[1] and [2] could be used as a starting point to migrate from directory to
symlink.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/01/msg00023.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/01/msg00024.html
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 11:07:09, vous avez écrit :
> Package: dspam
> Version: 3.10.1+dfsg-3~bpo60+1
> Severity: critical
>
>
> dspam sends '530 5.2.0 Message is empty. Aborting.' while receiving
> incorrect spam message with long-long line, for example with length
> about 300K bytes:
Fro
severity 688853 grave
thanks
Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 14:40:20, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 11:07:09, vous avez écrit :
> > Package: dspam
> > Version: 3.10.1+dfsg-3~bpo60+1
> > Severity: critical
> >
> >
>
Source: freeciv-client-sdl
Version: 2.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: §3.5
Dear Maintainer,
freeciv-client-sdl depends on ttf-arphic-uming package which is no
longer built by fonts-arphic-uming. Please change the dependency to
depends on fonts-arphic-uming instead.
Best regards.
-- Syste
Le samedi 7 septembre 2013 09:51:28 Raphael Droz a écrit :
>
> I happened to be in a situation where I can't even fully flush the postfix
> queue without having Dspam to segfault.
> I end up installing dspam-dbg and gdb and attach to the process [I wasn't
> able to run the process without the init
Le samedi 7 septembre 2013 21:13:24 vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 08:33:21PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le samedi 7 septembre 2013 09:51:28 Raphael Droz a écrit :
> > > I happened to be in a situation where I can't even fully flush the
>
Le samedi 7 septembre 2013 23:46:14 Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
>
> By the way, could you send me that css file so that I can run some test on
> it? It's better to not send it to the bug log as it might contain some
> private information. I don't know exactly what
Control: clone 722057 -1
Control: retitle 722057 libdspam7-drv-hash: dspam segfaults [cssclean]
Control: reopen -1
thanks
Reopening since only the crash in cssclean was fixed. The sample of
dmesg suggest that there is a similar kind of bug in libhash_drv. Sorry
for forgetting about this.
signatur
close 722485
thanks
Bug closed in upload of dspam 3.10.2+dfsg-9.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
guiclient.configuration.Configuration.getInstance(Configuration.
> java:59) at
> org.pdfsam.guiclient.gui.frames.JMainFrame.(JMainFrame.java:90)
> at org.pdfsam.guiclient.GuiClient.main(GuiClient.java:61)
To all those who have this problem, it can be avoided by setting the theme
Le jeudi 30 mai 2013 15:53:10, tony mancill a écrit :
> On 05/30/2013 06:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > reassign 709002 libjgoodies-looks-java
> > thanks
> >
> > A ClassNotFoundException poped up in pdfjam but it seems to me to be
> > a problem of lib
Le mercredi 23 mai 2012 20:09:40, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
>
> Here is a patch I made according to the suggestion of the thread named
> above. I'll find a DD to do an NMU in case you don't have the time to do
> the upload yourself. As recommanded by devref, I took
ide, even if it's critical
bug. I'll check with upstream if someone is still around but if not I'll write
a note recommending to switch away from dspam.
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: reopen 722484 m...@blackshift.org
Le lundi 7 octobre 2013 23:01:47, vous avez écrit :
> Hello
>
> I've deleted "/var/spool/dspam/data" and let dspam deliver a mail, that
> produces this backtrace:
>
> #0 0xb6f118ec in raise () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libpthread.so.0
> No symbol tab
Le mercredi 9 octobre 2013 14:56:23, vous avez écrit :
>
> Yes the bug was introduced between 3.10.2+dfsg-9 and 3.10.2+dfsg-10. As
> I'm running -9 without problems.
>
> Although the incremental diff from -9 to -10 doesn't look suspicious at
>
> the first glance:
> > diff --git a/src/hash_drv.c
Given the problem with the last upload, I'll revert it for now and see how to
solve the problem without breakage.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lbdb (0.37+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build-Depend on libvformat-dev instead of libvformat1-dev
+(Closes: #583073).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:03:08 +0200
+
lbdb (0.37) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix bashisms in m
Control: tags 735793 + pending
I pushed a fix in the git repository. Unfortunately I won't have access to my
gpg key for a few days so I can't upload the result. I notified my co-
maintainer and I expect him to do an upload very soon but in the worst case
I'll do it myself in about a week.
Best
Control: tags 735813 + pending
I pushed a fix in the git repository. Unfortunately I won't have access to my
gpg key for a few days so I can't upload the result. I notified my co-
maintainer and I expect him to do an upload very soon but in the worst case
I'll do it myself in about a week.
Best
Le jeudi 18 avril 2013 14:38:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
>
> Upstream appear to believe it {does,should}n't -
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704940#32
Oh good. I hadn't time to look at that yet. Should I upload the NMU then?
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Best regards,
Thomas
Le jeudi 18 avril 2013 21:46:18, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags 705552 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 14:54 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Le jeudi 18 avril 2013 14:38:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > > Upstream appear to believe it
68 matches
Mail list logo
