Hi. Just another person to confirm this bug, it took me some time to
track down and then notice it was already reported. I upgraded my mail
server to debian 9 and cyrus imapd always stop working after a couple
of days due to this. Fortunately my mail server is pretty low traffic,
so I'm hoping a
Yes, removing the package from testing seems reasonable to me.
/Simon
> 14 aug. 2018 kl. 20:39 skrev Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>
> Source: libykneomgr
> Version: 0.1.8-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
>
> Hi
>
> See https://www.x41-dsec.de/lab/advisories/x41-2018-004-libykneomgr/
> f
Done, see:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906319
/Simon
> 14 aug. 2018 kl. 23:51 skrev Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>
> Hi Simon,
>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:35:26PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Yes, removing the package from testing seems reason
Hi Sergei! We worked on this precisely at the same time! I just
uploaded 2.7.0-1 which incorporates upstream's solution to this
problem. I think it is a cleaner approach than to patch 2.6.1, and we
still have time before the freeze. Sorry for not noticing your push
before doing the upload, but
Thank you for fixing this! I'm hoping someone will take over this
package (or that upstream will roll a new releases that passes self-
tests which would allow me to more easily update the package) so I'll
leave this for future package maintainers. Feel free to push fixes to
git on salsa.
/Simon
tags 1024278 help
thanks
Philipp Kern writes:
> Hey Simon,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:46:19PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> > I see. If so, it would be good if pkgconf was made consistent with
>> > pkg-config here, if the intention is to replace it.
>>
>> This discussion needs to hap
tis 2021-01-26 klockan 19:25 +0100 skrev Bruno Kleinert:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:15:52 +0100 Simon Josefsson <
> si...@josefsson.org> wrote:
> > severity 975030 serious
> > severity 974997 serious
> > severity 974996 serious
> > severity 974995 serious
>
severity 975030 serious
severity 974997 serious
severity 974996 serious
severity 974995 serious
severity 974994 serious
severity 974993 serious
thanks
It was suggested to me on IRC that the severity of this could be
serious because the build-dependency libidn2-0-dev is going to be
removed from Deb
-dev instead of obsolete libidn2-0-dev. Closes:
#974995.
+
+ -- Simon Josefsson Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:17:37
+0100
+
gnunet (0.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update debian/watch to version 4, add a rule deal with pre and rc
diff -Nru gnunet-0.13.1/debian/control gnunet-0.13.1/debian/con
severity -1 normal
tags -1 moreinfo
thanks
Hello Karsten,
> I am sorry to report this, but the users of jabberd2 should now that
> there is no encryption possible with this package. An configuration
> with encryption settings is ignored and an unencrypted connection is
> opened without warnings.
loses: #991448.
+
+ -- Simon Josefsson Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:23:30 +0200
+
ui-utilcpp (1.10.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Ondřej Nový ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 48b4461..3964b68 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Build-Depends: debh
tags 925709 + upstream moreinfo fixed
thanks
Thanks for the report. I have uploaded 1.8.1-1 that from what I can
tell fixes this, but it would be good if you could confirm that it
builds fine for you too?
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ons 2022-11-16 klockan 23:55 +0100 skrev Sebastian Ramacher:
> Source: libgssglue
> Version: 0.7-1
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
>
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/libg/libgssglue/28379714/log.gz
>
> Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
> autopkgtes
tor 2022-11-17 klockan 10:38 +0100 skrev Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2022-11-17 08:57:12 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > ons 2022-11-16 klockan 23:55 +0100 skrev Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > Source: libgssglue
> > > Version: 0.7-1
> > > Severity: serious
>
Thanks, I have reported this to pkgconf upstream:
https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf/issues/278
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
reassign 938069 ftp.debian.org
retitle 938069 RM: python-pyhsm -- ROM
severity 938069 normal
thanks
Upstream python-pyhsm does not support python3 [1] so I believe it make
sense to remove python-pyhsm from unstable. The only in-debian
reverse dependency appear to be 'yubikey-val' which has been
Sam James writes:
> Thanks, I've reported this on the Valgrind bugzilla at
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478624.
Thank you for reporting this!
Upstream has fixed it:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commitdiff;h=d35005cef8ad8207542738812705ceabf137d7e0
It would be nice t
Thanks for caring about this package - feel free to NMU and push changes to
salsa! I think it would be better if this package was team maintained. I no
longer use it, and upstream broke the self tests with some changes in the last
release and wasn’t responsive in fixing them, so the state of th
Luca Boccassi writes:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:03:22 +1200 Andrew Bartlett
> wrote:
>> Just a warning that trying to brute force a fix for this is likely to
>> end badly. A lot of developer time was spent to get to this current
>> delicate situation, which relied on the narrow behaviour that is
Ingo writes:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 23:00:48 +0200 Drew Parsons wrote:
>> Just to be clear, I'm not supporting dropping armv7 support.
>> It's only one test that's failing. Skipping the one test (on 32-bit
>> arm) is all that's needed. It's passing the other tests.
>
> Yes, that's what I mean.
.0.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload.
> + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1062896
> +
> + -- Benjamin Drung Thu, 29 Feb 2024 15:52:14 +
> +
> shishi (1.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
>[ Simon Jo
tags 1066240 + patch
thanks
A patch to fix this compiler error is available in a pull request and
has been used by Nix:
https://github.com/kjn/lbzip2/pull/33
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source: unicap
Version: 0.9.12+repack20150328.0.git2c600ae-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: si...@josefsson.org
Usertags: ftbfs-trixie
Hi. I have tried to rebuild unicap in sid and it fails:
Making all in po
make[3]: Entering directory '/builds/jas/unicap/deb
Hi.
Most tools from netkit are candidates for migration to GNU InetUtils,
and rwho(d) may be another one -- see email and bug report below.
Cc'ing debian-devel to have broader discussion.
First, I think we need to understand the rationale for doing anything
about 'netkit-rwho': do we want to do s
Thank you for fixing this! I was just about to fix it. I've merged
your patch into git:
https://salsa.debian.org/xmpp-team/jabberd2/-/commit/aafafbc13ed3d8f06768d6228de6f58cd3d23ff5
For some reason the pkg-xmpp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list
doesn't work, or I would have received th
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: shishi
> Version: 0.0.26-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package can't install it's build dependencies. It depeneds
> on both libgnutls-dev and libtasn1-2-dev. libgnutls-dev now
> depends on libtasn1-3-dev and that conflicts with libtasn1
Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can we make that
>
> libtasn1-3-dev | libtasn1-2-dev
>
> to get a slight chance for backporting?
I've installed this. I assume that libtasn1-3-dev will be the first
choice when Debian's build robots build the package?
Objections to do this from anyone
Package: sendpage-common
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC:
usr/share/doc/sendpage-common/docs/rfc1861.txt.gz
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documenta
Package: xemacs21-basesupport
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/etc/zenirc/RFC1459
editors/xemacs21-basesupport
The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
htt
Package: lksctp-tools-doc
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-mib-10.txt.gz
doc/lksctp-tools-doc
usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-sigtran-signalling-over-sctp-applic-09.txt.gz
doc/lksctp-tools-d
Package: gnustep-netclasses
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Documentation/Developer/rfc1459.txt
libs/gnustep-netclasses
The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
htt
Package: cl-irc
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC:
usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2810.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2811.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2812.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2813.txt.gz
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://b
Package: cl-s-http-server
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/s-http-server/rfc2616.txt.gz
The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentat
Package: fml
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/fml/module/fml-devel/Mail/Bounce/rfc1894.txt
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentati
Package: erlang-doc-html
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/erlang-doc-html/html/lib/megaco-3.0.1/doc/standard/rfc3015.txt.gz
The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.deb
Package: cl-s-base64
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc1421.txt.gz
interpreters/cl-s-base64
usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc2045.txt.gz
interpreters/cl-s-base64
usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc3548.
Package: libpt-doc
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-core-22.txt.gz
usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-21.txt.gz
The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian
Package: libsasl2
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-anon-02.txt.gz libs/libsasl2
usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-01.txt.gzlibs/libsasl2
usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-gssapi-00.txt.gz
Package: doc-iana
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-idna-14.txt.gz doc/doc-iana
usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-11.txt.gz doc/doc-iana
usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-punycode-03.t
Package: dhcp3-common
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc1542.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2131.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common
usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2132.txt.gz
Package: openswan
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3947.txt.gz net/openswan
usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3948.txt.gz net/openswan
usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-09.tx
Package: bidentd
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/bidentd/rfc1413.gznet/bidentd
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing
Package: freeradius
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/draft-sterman-aaa-sip-00.txt.gz net/freeradius
usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/pppext-eap-sim-12.txt.gz net/freeradius
usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1157.txt.gz
Package: atftpd
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc1350.html net/atftpd
usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2090.html net/atftpd
usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2347.html net/at
Package: messagewall
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2045.txt.gzmail/messagewall
usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2046.txt.gzmail/messagewall
usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2554.txt.gz
Package: ircd-irc2
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc1459.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2
usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2810.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2
usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2811.txt.gz
Package: stunnel
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/stunnel/rfc2246.txt.gznet/stunnel
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing
Package: ircd-ircu
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/ircd-ircu/rfc1413.txt.gz net/ircd-ircu
usr/share/doc/ircd-ircu/rfc1459.unet.gz net/ircd-ircu
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.
Package: araneida
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/araneida/doc/rfc2388.txt.gz web/araneida
usr/share/doc/araneida/doc/rfc2616.txt.gz web/araneida
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.deb
Package: zenirc
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/zenirc/RFC1459.gz net/zenirc
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-n
Package: cl-aserve
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/cl-aserve/rfc2396.txt.gz web/cl-aserve
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/remo
Package: phpgroupware-calendar
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
usr/share/doc/phpgroupware-calendar/rfc2445.txt.gz
web/phpgroupware-calendar
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http:
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The RFC's published here all were made by individuals, and were
> not made by some IETF process.
>
> rfc1459 comes from a document that was always part of the irc
> source package.
Understood, but it seems that RFC 2810-2813 may have been improved by
the
Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: shishi
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
> shishi_0.0.25-1 FTBFS on amd64 (but seems also on others) by failing
> tests:
Hi Roberto!
Thanks for the report, I debugged this and the fix is as below (for
gl/md4.c in Shishi). It will be part in the n
=
RCS file: /sources/shishi/shishi-debian/shishid.init.d,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- shishid.init.d 10 Mar 2006 08:55:25 - 1.1
+++ shishid.init.d 18 Apr 2006 08:13:37 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#! /
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:15:42AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Elrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> >> Can we make that
>> >>
>&
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:54:56PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Thanks for the input. Judging from some of the build logs:
>>
>> http://buildd.debian.org
Package: openswan
Version: 2.4.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
./usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/std/draft-beaulieu-ike-xauth-02.txt.gz
./usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/std/draft-dukes-ike-mode-cfg-02.txt.gz
The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:
htt
Package: libsmi2
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/libsmi2/draft-irtf-nmrg-sming-02.txt.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/remo
Package: ircd-hybrid
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/ircd-hybrid/technical/draft-mitchell-irc-capabilities-01.txt.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
ht
Package: sidentd
Version: 3.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/libvorbis-dev/html/draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-03.txt.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.de
Package: libtheora-dev
Version: 0.0.0.alpha7-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/libtheora-dev/draft-barbato-avt-rtp-theora-01.txt.gz
/usr/share/doc/libtheora-dev/draft-barbato-avt-rtp-theora-01.xml.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free
Package: mobilemesh
Version: 1.0-6.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/mobilemesh/InternetDrafts/draft-grace-manet-mmrp-00.txt.gz
/usr/share/doc/mobilemesh/InternetDrafts/draft-grace-manet-mmbdp-00.txt.gz
/usr/share/doc/mobilemesh/InternetDraf
Package: sidentd
Version: 3.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/sidentd/draft-morgan-ident-ext-04.txt.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/remov
Package: uuid-dev
Version: 1.2-1.39-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:
/usr/share/doc/libuuid1/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt.gz
The license on RFC/I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian
On 2 okt 2006, at 23.05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version
1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.
I will modi
Thanks for dealing with the bug so fast!
The source package appear to contain the same file:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs_1.39.orig.tar.gz
e2fsprogs-1.39/doc/draft-leach-uuids-guids-01.txt
Steve Langasek suggested on debian-legal that asking for permission
from t
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 03:02:32PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Thanks for dealing with the bug so fast!
>>
>> The source package appear to contain the same file:
>>
>> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main
On 3 okt 2006, at 17.32, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
There is DFSG #4: 'Integrity of The Author's Source Code: The license
may restrict source-code from being distributed in modified form
_only_ if the license allows the distr
Btw, the draft in question has been revised and published as RFC 4120.
Adding the URL to it in README.Debian or somewhere might be helpful.
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 09:21 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Btw, the draft in question has been revised and published as RFC 4120.
> > Adding the URL to it in README.Debian or somewhere might be helpful.
>
Package: erlang
Version: 1:11.b.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: bincimap
Version: 1.2.14beta2-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source pa
Package: gidentd
Version: 0.4.5-7.2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: l2tpd
Version: 0.70-pre20031121-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this sourc
Package: libdigest-md2-perl
Version: 2.03-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source
Package: libdigest-md4-perl
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source
Package: libsmi
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package co
Package: httptunnel
Version: 3.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: liburi-perl
Version: 1.35-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source packag
Package: gnome-utils
Version: 2.14.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source pack
Package: jta
Version: 2.5-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package contain
Package: stunnel
Version: 2:3.26-11
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: libspf2
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package c
Package: inetutils
Version: 2:1.4.3+20060719-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this sou
Package: nettle
Version: 1.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package con
Package: gtk-gnutella
Version: 0.96.1svn11444-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this so
Package: libgcgi
Version: 0.9.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: cherokee
Version: 0.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.3.0-9.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: libuser
Version: 1:0.54.6-2.1.dfsg.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this
Package: dictd
Version: 1.10.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package co
Package: keynote
Version: 2.3-11
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package co
Package: qpopper
Version: 4.0.5-4.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: tcllib
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package cont
Package: libspf
Version: 0.999-1.0.0-p3-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source p
Package: imapsync
Version: 1.182-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: openh323
Version: 1.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package
Package: krb5
Version: 1.4.4-3
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package cont
Package: vpim
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This bug has been filed on multiple packages, and general discussions
are kindly requested to take place on debian-legal or debian-devel in
the thread with Subject: "Non-free IETF RFC/I-Ds in source packages".
It seems this source package conta
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
