El 7/2/23 a las 4:04, Steven Robbins escribió:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 7:04:26 P.M. CST Santiago Vila wrote:
The tests do not even *run* on the buildds, because they are skipped.
Indeed! I must have skipped over that output :-)
But I think the larger point remains: there is no build
Hi.
I said:
Instead of using "mv" after dh_install, I would probably
try to refactor this using debian/foo.install files,
which allow wilcards.
Those debian/*.install files would tell dh_install where
to put things, without having to move them ourselves in debian/rules.
I attach a proof of c
Hi. Beware also with the current debian/libdislocker0.7.links file,
it creates symlinks in usr/lib. I think (but I'm not sure), that
this file may be removed and dh will be smart enough to create
those symlinks automatically.
Thanks.
El 8/2/23 a las 9:33, Andrius Merkys escribió:
Hi Santiago,
On 2023-02-06 19:36, Santiago Vila wrote:
This is fully reproducible at least on Hetzner virtual instances of type CX21
and CX31.
Thanks for giving this a look. Could you please provide the versions of
python3-biopython and
Package: src:python-cogent
Version: 2022.8.24a1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh
Package: src:sardana
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with
Package: src:umap-learn
Version: 0.4.5+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-in
Package: src:taurus-pyqtgraph
Version: 0.5.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-i
Note: The absolute minimum change to fix the FTBFS problem is to raise
debian/compat from 5 to 7.
However, it is possible to raise it from 5 to 11 without changing anything else,
and the package is still functionally equivalent.
When using compat 12 there are things in debian/rules that would ha
Package: src:wine
Version: 8.0~repack-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-arch
d
Package: src:minexpert2
Version: 8.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
PATH:
/<>/doc/us
Package: src:kotlin
Version: 1.3.31+~1.0.1+~0.11.12-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh b
severity 992805 normal
thanks
El 23/8/21 a las 18:43, Chris Hofstaedtler escribió:
Source: bplay
Hi,
it appears bplay is an audio player for RIFF and VOC files. To play
these files, it uses /dev/dsp, an OSS relic. Using it nowadays would
require wrapping it in aoss (alsa-oss).
Such wrapping
severity 1002402 important
thanks
Note: The package builds ok for me right now in bookworm.
A diff between a past failed build log and a current successful
build log shows these differences:
-Get:89 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 python3-scipy amd64
1.8.1-22 [17.2 MB]
-Get:90
Package: dh-python
Version: 5.20230130
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
While upgrading a Debian server from Debian 9 to Debian 10,
then from Debian 10 to Debian 11 and then from Debian 11
to bookworm, the following error happened:
Preparing to unpack .../dh-python_5.20230130_all.deb ...
Unpa
Package: src:os-autoinst
Version: 4.6.1674476646.0798a03c-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
Package: src:python-streamz
Version: 0.6.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-ind
Package: vdr-dev
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:vdr-plugin-mp3
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, the vdr-plugin-mp3 package failed
to build:
[..
Package: src:hipsparse
Version: 5.3.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-arch
Package: src:jthread
Version: 1.3.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-arch
dh build-arch
dh: wa
reassign 1031252 libamdhip64-5
affects 1031252 + src:hipsparse
found 1031252 5.2.3-1~0exp1
fixed 1031252 5.2.3-2
forcemerge 1031252 1021643
thanks
El 14/2/23 a las 5:15, Cordell Bloor escribió:
This is a bug in libamdhip64-5:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021643
It was fixe
Hello.
This is what I did today. Maybe someone can follow my steps
and arrive at something.
I'm using this $HOME/.procmailrc file:
-
LOGFILE=$HOME/.cache/procmail.log
VERBOSE=yes
:0 h
SUBJECT=|formail -cXSubject:|cat
MYVAR=$SUBJECT
:0
/dev/null
---
Hello.
I'm not a trac user myself, but I've noticed that trac has just been
removed from testing today.
AFAIK, the main reason trac was not ready for Debian 12 was the
problems with python3, but those in theory have been fixed
by version 1.5.4-1 (bug #1030413).
Therefore: Should not this bug (#
Sorry. I said:
Therefore: Should not this bug (#1024647) be closed accordingly?
I really meant *this* bug, #988462, i.e. "trac: not ready for Debian 12".
(But while we are at it, the other bug is fixed but not closed and maybe
it should be closed as well).
Thanks.
After applying the suggested patch, the reported error
does not show anymore.
Instead, I get this:
/scripts/local-bottom/growroot: line 97: wait-for-root: not found
Where does this "wait-for-root" come from?
I can't find it in any package.
Thanks.
El 17/2/23 a las 22:57, Ross Vandegrift escribió:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 09:54:08PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
After applying the suggested patch, the reported error
does not show anymore.
Instead, I get this:
/scripts/local-bottom/growroot: line 97: wait-for-root: not found
Where does
severity 1014662 important
thanks
Note: I'm restoring the original severity because Martin Pitt says
in #1027050 that the fatal failure is due to wait-for-root, not flock.
(However, I could not imagine an upload fixing #1027050 which
would not fix this one in the same upload as well).
Thanks.
El 18/2/23 a las 12:20, Daniel Swarbrick escribió:
I am unable to reproduce this in a clean sid chroot.
Hi. This one FTBFS randomly for me in bookworm.
However, I've tested it using virtual machines with 1 CPU
and also with 2 CPUs with different failure rates.
With 2 CPUs, the failure rate I
El 13/2/23 a las 8:21, Bo YU escribió:
The fix is easy and I have tested the patch already on my machines.
Hi. Note that the deb package of gawk does not contain any .info files,
so adding a build-dependency on texinfo should not really be needed.
(The build failure is actually an artifact of r
reassign 1031585 libamdhip64-5
affects 1031585 + src:hipsparse
fixed 1031585 5.2.3-2
close 1031585
forcemerge 1021643 1031585
thanks
El 18/2/23 a las 20:55, Lucas Nussbaum escribió:
c++: error: -E or -x required when input is from standard input
See above.
Thanks.
severity 1031478 important
retitle 1031478 nrepl-clojure: FTBFS: Build randomly either hangs or fails with
test errors
reopen 1031478
thanks
Hello.
I can't build this package reliably. At some point I was able to get
the "Build killed with signal TERM" error reported by Lucas.
But now that I t
Hello.
I've received the following report from the Debian bug system.
Summary: There is no source for gettext-tools/m4/csharpexec-test.exe.
Note: The Debian package disabled the mono stuff in version 0.17-7 (dated
2009-08-17),
so I guess this file is one without which we could live, but I have
El 26/2/23 a las 11:56, Bruno Haible escribió:
Santiago Vila wrote:
Summary: There is no source for gettext-tools/m4/csharpexec-test.exe.
Fixed through
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bda6586b87f7e258c16bd0dca5c43048b9920a9
Thanks a lot!
For completeness
Hmm, I said:
For completeness: Would it make sense to add an indication, somewhere, about
the way
to create the .exe from the .cs? This is something that surely everybody using
mono knows, but I had to search for it. I guess this would be correct:
Nevermind. I guess this is exactly what cshar
El 26/2/23 a las 0:04, Adrian Bunk escribió:
The Ubuntu diff has a fix for this issue caused by merged /usr
(untested).
Note: Such diff was actually already in #1017937. I've just merged
both bugs. Also, I've tested the diff and confirm that it works.
Thanks.
El 28/2/23 a las 12:53, Andrius Merkys escribió:
On a related note, is trying network access to localhost RC?
It's ok if you try to connect to a service started by the build process
itself (please downgrade again if my severity change was wrong).
This is the exact wording in policy:
For pack
Package: packer
Version: 1.6.6+ds1-7
Severity: grave
Hello.
I'm using packer and ansible to create images for GCP.
After upgrading to Debian bookworm, packer crashes on
the most simple template:
$ packer build sample.pkr.hcl
panic: ConfigSpec failed: gob: type cty.Type has no exported fields [
reassign 1032549 pylint
found 1032549 2.15.10-1
fixed 1032549 2.16.2-2
affects 1032549 src:python-pbcore
thanks
El 9/3/23 a las 19:18, Nilesh Patra escribió:
This has been fixed with pylint 2.16.2-2, which is currently in unstable but
it'd migrate to testing
by tomorrow or the day after. Could
El 21/3/23 a las 19:57, Chris Hofstaedtler escribió:
it seems like its not 100% reproducible (in my builds at least).
Hello. I can reproduce the FTBFS failure in a consistent way
(i.e. not randomly but always) on three different kind of
machines: Self-hosted VMs using kvm, VMs from GCP, and VMs
Package: src:black-box-terminal
Version: 0.13.2+pq.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
If my reading of (all the messages in) ITP bug #1032846 is not mistaken,
this package was renamed and now "blackbox-terminal" is "the good one".
If this is correct, please reassign this bug to ftp.debian.o
El 25/3/23 a las 12:10, Barak A. Pearlmutter escribió:
Thanks for noting that.
Already filed for RM, see bugs.debian.org/1033450
Thank you.
I'm closing this bug, then, as it's already in ftpmaster hands.
(My suggestion to reassign was to save one bug number,
but nevermind).
Thanks.
Note: Hardcoded dependency on libffmpegthumbnailer4v5 in debian/control
is also highly suspicious and should probably be removed as well.
(this is what ${shlibs:Depends} is for)
Thanks.
Package: src:gammu
Version: 1.42.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-arch -
Package: src:golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3
Version: 1.14.15~ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rule
Package: src:reposurgeon
Version: 4.31-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-ar
Package: src:pyephem
Version: 4.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-arch
Package: src:auctex
Version: 12.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
/bin/bash: line 1: git
Package: src:feynmf
Version: 1.08-13
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
dh_testdir
mkdir -p "/
Package: src:opm-common
Version: 2022.10+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-in
El 22/1/23 a las 17:40, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
The failure in the log doesn't look like tzdata related.
Certainly it does not look tzdata related, but I believe it
is tzdata related because once I installed tzdata in the chroot
to test, it built fine.
Could you share your full sbuild/pbuilde
Package: src:glosstex
Version: 0.4.dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-arch
test -x debian/r
Package: src:golang-github-nats-io-jwt
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-in
Package: src:xemacs21-packages
Version: 2009.02.17.dfsg.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
Package: src:remind
Version: 04.02.01-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-in
Hello.
I can also reproduce this build failure.
My build environment is made of virtual machines in the cloud
with either 1 CPU or 2 CPUs.
This bug happens randomly, but the failure rate seems to depend on the machine.
On systems with 2 CPUs, the failure rate I get is around 50%.
On systems wi
Package: src:python-os-ken
Version: 2.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-indep
make: pyversion
Hello.
Thanks for taking care of this.
I'd like to emphasize that this is most probably a Makefile bug (or whatever
is the proper name when using cmake), maybe a missing dependency somewhere.
I discovered it by building all packages in bullseye using virtual
machines with a single CPU, and the
El 27/1/23 a las 22:37, Adrian Bunk escribió:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 02:15:13AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Greetings.
I'm doing archive-wide rebuilds again.
I've just filed 21 bugs with subject "Missing build-depends on tzdata"
in bookworm (as tzdata is not build-ess
El 28/1/23 a las 10:11, Vincent Bernat escribió:
On 2023-01-28 00:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
Release Policy exists as a canonical list of what should be RC and > what not,
and it's intended to avoid stupid discussions like this one.
Extending build-essential is easier than asking man
El 28/1/23 a las 13:59, Adrian Bunk escribió:
Policy 4.2 also says
Source packages should specify which binary packages they require to
be installed or not to be installed in order to build correctly.
We are not following the "not to be installed" part,
which is the can of worms you would
retitle 1027364 golang-github-go-co-op-gocron: FTBFS (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
reopen 1027364
found 0.5.0-2
thanks
Adam, please don't close bugs just because they say "bullseye" in the title.
In most cases, I really meant "bullseye and later".
I've now fixed the title to avoid confusion
El 28/1/23 a las 16:50, Adam Borowski escribió:
Control: close 1027364
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 04:31:25PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
retitle 1027364 golang-github-go-co-op-gocron: FTBFS (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
reopen 1027364
found 0.5.0-2
thanks
Adam, please don't close bugs
retitle 1027360 calcurse: FTBFS (missing build-depends on tzdata)
severity 1027360 important
reopen 1027360
thanks
I'm setting this as "important" at the request of Sebastian Ramacher
but this is still a bug in unstable.
severity 1027364 important
reopen 1027364
thanks
I'm setting this as "important" at the request of Sebastian Ramacher
but this is still a bug in unstable.
retitle 1027370 golang-github-powerman-check: FTBFS (missing build-depends on
tzdata)
severity 1027370 important
reopen 1027370
thanks
I'm setting this as "important" at the request of Sebastian Ramacher
but this is still a bug in unstable.
severity 1029425 important
thanks
I'm setting this as "important" at the request of Sebastian Ramacher.
reassign 1029461 texlive-base
affects 1029461 src:xemacs21-packages
found 1029461 2022.20220923-1
fixed 1029461 2022.20230122-1
forcemerge 1029461 1029438
thanks
Hi. I've just built "xemacs21-packages" in bookworm and it failed.
Then I built it in sid, and it worked.
The error message is the sam
Well, I feared the merge could fail, and yes, it did.
I have not gotten the hang of it.
If you could merge them properly, that would be great.
Thanks a lot.
Hi.
Something strange just happened which led me to this bug
report which you filed in 2020 (and last touched in May 2021).
enigmail is available in bookworm right now.
$ rmadison enigmail
enigmail | 2:1.9.9-1~deb8u1| oldoldoldstable | source, all
enigmail | 2:2.2.4-0.2~deb10u1 | oldsta
Package: src:enigmail
Version: 2:2.2.4-0.3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I've just noticed that enigmail currently fails to build in bookworm:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_auto_test -i
make -j1 test "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j1 --verbose" VERBOSE=1
make[1]: Entering di
Package: src:bind-dyndb-ldap
Version: 11.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: fixed -1 11.10-1
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:litecoin
Version: 0.18.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: fixed -1 0.21.2.1-1
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules
Package: src:macromoleculebuilder
Version: 3.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: fixed -1 4.0.0+dfsg-2
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:
[...]
El 4/1/23 a las 8:40, Andrius Merkys escribió:
I can reproduce the issue. Should I propose a bullseye-pu upload fixing it?
Yes, please. Packages in stable must build in stable, that's the idea.
Thanks.
Package: src:golang-github-arran4-golang-ical
Version: 0.0~git20220517.fd89fef-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...
Package: src:golang-github-crewjam-saml
Version: 0.4.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build-i
Package: src:golang-github-go-git-go-git
Version: 5.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-
Package: src:golang-github-jedib0t-go-pretty
Version: 6.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules bin
Package: src:golang-github-libgit2-git2go
Version: 34.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binar
Package: src:golang-github-rickb777-date
Version: 1.19.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
Package: src:golang-github-spf13-cast
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-ind
Package: src:golang-go.uber-atomic
Version: 1.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-indep
Package: src:kodi
Version: 2:20.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binar
Package: src:sshfs-fuse
Version: 3.7.1+repack-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bullseye, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-a
reopen 1022311
found 1022311 1.16-1
found 1022311 1.17-1
fixed 1022311 1.18-1
thanks
El 13/11/22 a las 22:45, Arthur de Jong escribió:
If this ever needs to be backported for some reason the fix is trivial:
https://arthurdejong.org/git/python-stdnum/commit/?id=1003033fa0e97726d92f47231f96cf02fb3
reopen 1021551
retitle 1021551 voms-api-java: FTBFS in bullseye because of expired
certificates in test suite
found 1021551 3.3.2-1
found 1021551 3.3.2-3
fixed 1021551 3.3.2-4
tags 1021551 + ftbfs
thanks
Hi. I'm reopening because this problem also happens in bullseye,
and packages in stable must
reopen 976506
found 976506 1.7.2-1
found 976506 1.7.2-2
fixed 976506 2.0.1-1
thanks
Hi. Please consider fixing this in stable as well,
as packages in stable must build in stable.
If you have never done an upload for stable, the procedure
is documented here:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/de
reopen 991067
found 991067 1.2-1
found 991067 1.2-4
fixed 991067 1.2-5
thanks
Note: There is already a release.debian.org bug with a debdiff.
El 9/1/23 a las 16:25, Nilesh Patra escribió:
I would make an upload proposal in the form of debdiff, but I'm unsure
about backporting the fix in unstable to stable in this case, because
I don't really understand it.
I will not do it, it is not worth the effort. The package is functional, it
f
El 9/1/23 a las 23:13, Bob Proulx escribió:
Unfortunately in 3.24 this functionality is broken. I see in the
Testing migration "excuses" this "Too young, only 4 of 5 days old".
Should severity be "important" in order to keep Testing from breaking?
I've just set it to serious, which is the mini
forwarded 1028356 https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail/issues/5
tags 1028356 + help
thanks
Hi. I've forwarded the bug by making a github issue from it.
There is a full git history for procmail at github. If you
feel brave enough you could try a git-bisect on the code
to see where this bug was i
notfixed 1027908 6.4.4-1
found 1027908 6.4.4-1
thanks
Quoting Debian Policy 4.2.
If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build the
package and produce working binaries on a system with only essential and
build-essential packages installed and also those required to sat
reopen 1010120
found 1010120 0.13.0-6
found 1010120 0.16.0-3
fixed 1010120 0.16.0-6
thanks
(This is to prevent the bug being archived prematurely)
severity 1027208 important
thanks
Hi. I think this is what you really meant.
Hi.
This is really weird.
This package also failed for me on bookworm, with the same error
which happened to Lucas (the one in the Subject).
But today I tried again (in bookworm) and it worked, without any source change
at all.
(mricron version 1.2.20211006+dfsg-1).
I see that this change was
Hi. I've just build ruby-premailer-rails version 1.10.3-3 successfully in
unstable today.
I believe some build-dependency might have changed behaviour between the date
this
was reported and now. Could you please double-check?
Thanks.
reopen 997222
found 997222 1.4.D001-11
fixed 997222 1.4.D001-12
thanks
Note: There is a fix proposal for bullseye in Bug #1025703.
Hi.
I can reproduce this build failure on Hetzner virtual machines with 2 CPUs,
where it fails randomly 50% of the time.
Therefore, to reproduce the randomness, you have to try many times.
(On Hetzner virtual machines with only one CPU, it does not seem to fail).
Thanks.
Hi.
The relevant paragraph in Policy is this one:
If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build the
package and produce working binaries on a system with only essential and
build-essential packages installed and also those required to satisfy the
build-time relations
Dear maintainers:
This package FTBFS for me on bullseye, tried several times on different
machines.
(I'm attaching a build log)
I think it is the same bug reported by Lucas back in October 2021 (i.e. this
one),
which was fixed only in bookworm.
Unfortunately, I'm not 100% sure, because I trie
901 - 1000 of 5633 matches
Mail list logo
