Bug#1005899: mplayer: should not release with bookworm

2022-02-17 Thread Reimar Döffinger
though it's not a drop-in replacement (different command-line) and supposedly it aims more at modern computers, so might not be so great a replacement for legacy hardware. Best regards, Reimar Döffinger

Bug#1005899: mplayer: should not release with bookworm

2022-02-27 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:45:59PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-02-17 19:13:08 +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > > > > > On 16 Feb 2022, at 23:25, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > > Let's stop pretending that mplayer is maintained. >

Bug#1005899: mplayer: should not release with bookworm

2022-02-28 Thread Reimar Döffinger
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 19:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > It seems to me that at #1004579 (ffmpeg 5.0) and #939032 (giflib) > would need to be addressed, These are definitely fixed in 1.5, and the fix for giflib should be not hard to cherry-pick for 1.4 if there is a need. > and #958865 (crash on theo

Bug#1021013: mplayer: CVE-2022-38600 CVE-2022-38856 CVE-2022-38861 CVE-2022-38862 CVE-2022-38864

2022-09-30 Thread Reimar Döffinger
Hi! > CVE-2022-38600[0]: > | Mplayer SVN-r38374-13.0.1 is vulnerable to Memory Leak via vf.c and > | vf_vo.c. > > https://trac.mplayerhq.hu/ticket/2390#comment:2 > https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/commit/59792bad144c11b21b27171a93a36e3fbd21eb5e > (r38380) > Followup: > https://git.ffmp

Bug#445731: mplayer stops working after kernel update to 2.6.21

2007-10-09 Thread Reimar Döffinger
> There is no difference at all in the outputs. I suspect this is not an > MPlayer problem. Actually there is, in the later one audio gets stuck at 0.0 seconds. My guess is that ALSA broke... Greetings, Reimar Döffinger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Bug#445731: mplayer stops working after kernel update to 2.6.21

2007-10-13 Thread Reimar Döffinger
Hello, On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Sean Zimmermann wrote: > I found ALSA stopped working after the kernel upgrade. Any program that > tried to work with alsa (like xmms, totem, or gnome sound) stalled. I > recompiled the drivers and alsa now appears to be working. While it does not

Bug#395252: ignore bug 395252 'mplayer embeds ffmpeg' for lenny

2008-06-16 Thread Reimar Döffinger
ll not be supported by upstream at least for now since MPlayer depends on some of its internal functions that can not be exported cleanly (features that depend on a FFmpeg-compatible config.h). Greetings, Reimar Döffinger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Bug#395252: requires too much security maintainance work due to embedded ffmpeg copy - Lenny status

2008-03-28 Thread Reimar Döffinger
etings, Reimar Döffinger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#473056: mplayer: CVE-2008-0073 remote code execution via crafted rtsp stream

2008-03-30 Thread Reimar Döffinger
ch/056938.html > the patch fixes the same problem in a different way like the > diff from the xine-lib repository. I did not check myself I admit, I just assumed from explanations elsewhere that the xine version was missing some checks on stream_id as well. Sorry if I misunderstood (and thus

Bug#475973: mplayer: FTBFS: cabac.h:525: error: can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2008-04-14 Thread Reimar Döffinger
might be caused by the default value of CFLAGS now set by > dpkg-buildpackage. Maybe this code doesn't build with -O2 ? No, certainly not. From the MPlayer developers side, only the build flags chosen by MPlayer's configure are acceptable and anything else is unsupported and very likely to fail. In particular, -fomit-frame-pointer is mandatory. While there is alternative code that works without, it is (for H.264 about 10%) slower and thus not really acceptable. Also, -O2 compared to the default of -O4 (equivalent to -O3) has very different inlining behaviour and might cause significant performance differences as well. Greetings, Reimar Döffinger

Bug#536885: symbol lookup error: mplayer: undefined symbol: codec_wav_tags

2009-07-15 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 05:38:54PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > mplayer however contains a private copy of ffmpeg in its sources, and > has therefore no problem including headers that are not > installed. libavformat/riff.h is e.g. such a header. This is strictly > speaking a violation of usage

Bug#788126: libboost1.55-dev: Contains files with missing or questionable licenses

2015-06-08 Thread Reimar Döffinger
t tried to avoid this license mess, however that activity seems to have died... Given the popularity of the library and the regularity of license slip-ups a more long-term solution than manual review/fixing would be nice to have. And apologies if "Severity: serious" was the incorrect cho

Bug#653887: libavformat53 breaks mplayer

2012-01-01 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On 1 Jan 2012, at 15:26, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On So, Jan 01, 2012 at 15:08:03 (CET), Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 08:25:00 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> >>> I really think this is a bug in mplayer. ff_codec_wav_tags is and always >>> was an internal symbol, that is

Bug#788126: Patch

2016-02-20 Thread Reimar Döffinger
I see there is some progress upstream so it may be reasonable to just wait it out. But since I hacked it up for myself anyway (well, only the grep expression really, did not test the rules file). The following quick hack patch would remove the questionable headers and ensure only properly licensed

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2014-02-16 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:07:36PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff > >> wrote: > >> > Package: mplayer > >> >

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2014-02-17 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Reimar Döffinger > wrote: > > What would constitute a constructive comment? > > Ideally "I am interested in making mplayer work against the libavcodec > that we have

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2014-02-19 Thread Reimar Döffinger
what you wrote sounded more like it's at least also 2) MPlayer has packaging issues I've mentioned this a few times over the years, I'd be interested in improving 2), and that is regardless of the status of this ticket. > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Reimar Döffinger > wr

Bug#732159: Should this package be removed?

2013-12-15 Thread Reimar Döffinger
On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> Package: mplayer >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org >