Package: zaptel-modules
Version: zaptel-source
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have this error when installing:
dpkg: error processing
zaptel-modules-2.6.18_1.2.9.1.dfsg-2+2.6.18-10.00.Custom_i386.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite `/lib/modules/2.6.18/modules.isapnpm
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080216-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After upgrading from 1.96+20080210-1 to 1.96+20080216-1, my system failed to
boot, hanging at a screen displaying GRUB. This version also breaks another
system here, which hangs without even displa
talling the previous version of the package and
trying an upgrade again?
Peter
--
Peter Hicks | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | g: 0xE7C839F4 | w: www.poggs.com
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:27:33PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Did this happen on earlier versions of grub2 ?
No, I've been upgrading daily for a while and rebooting the laptop many
times during the day.
> What happens if you rename /boot/grub/grub.cfg ? Do you get a rescue prompt?
Yes, the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:43:16PM +0000, Peter Hicks wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:27:33PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > > Did this happen on earlier versions of grub2 ?
> >
> >
Package: grub2
Version: 1.95+20080128-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After upgrading this morning, my laptop (Dell Latitude D820) rebooted
immediately after "Welcome to GRUB!" appeared. The BIOS went through a
'slow' boot, indicative that the last reboot was unexpecte
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:15:29PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Can you reproduce it with:
>
> apt-get install grub-rescue-pc qemu
> dd if=/dev/sda5 of=/tmp/img
> qemu -boot a -fda /usr/lib/grub-rescue/grub-rescue-floppy.img -hda /tmp/img
>
> and trying to setup gfxterm manually? (by load
xample.bz2
Peter
--
Peter Hicks | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | g: 0xE7C839F4 | w: www.poggs.com
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ow to reproduce the
problem, I'm happy to help.
Best wishes,
Peter
--
Peter Hicks | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | g: 0xE7C839F4 | w: www.poggs.com
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
o reproduce the
problem, I'm happy to help.
Best wishes,
Peter
--
Peter Hicks | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | g: 0xE7C839F4 | w: www.poggs.com
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:2.4.1-10
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/ooffice
Justification: renders package unusable
When double-clicking a .doc file in Gnome, OOo fails to start. Running from
the command line:
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: syntax error near unexpec
Package: libcatalyst-modules-perl
Version: 11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libcatalyst-modules-perl_12_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/Catalyst::Manual.3pm.gz', which is
/also in package libcata
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.24-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello
After upgrading from 2.3.23 to 2.3.24, slapd refuses to start:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /etc/init.d/slapd start
No configuration file was found for slapd at /etc/ldap/slapd.conf.
If you have moved the s
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:22:33PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
>
>> slapd.conf is owned by root.root, and chown-ing it to root.openldap fixes
>> the problem.
>
> Is this because the perms on the file are 0640?
Spot on.
>> Maybe this should
er a botched install of another
package.
False alarm, I believe the bug can be closed as I can't reproduce it any more.
Apologies :(
Peter.
--
Peter Hicks | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | g: 0xE7C839F4 | w: www.poggs.com
A: Because it destroys the flow of the conversation
Q: Why is top-posting
Package: bind9-host
Version: 1:9.3.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After a partial dist-upgrade to Debian 4.0, 'host' fails:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ host -t any localhost
host: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libbind9.so.0: undefined symbol:
isc_net_pton
This appears
16 matches
Mail list logo
