Seeing the error messages you are getting, it sounds like there is a
memory shortage, possibly the vmware ballooning driver is failing to
provide sufficient memory in time.
It does not look like rsync is to blame for your problems.
Paul
On Thu 18 May 2017, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Now run this:
>
> remote$ touch ./-zT.mp4
> local$ mkdir test
> local$ cd test
> local$ rsync -zavPH --numeric-ids -S --stats '--rsh=ssh -T' $remote:\*4 .
>
> Expected: the “-zT.mp4” file is transferred.
>
> Actual: the whole home directory of
On Sat 23 Oct 2021, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: pixmap
> Version: 2.6pl4-20
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ?
> As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing.
Unfortunately real life got into the way.
I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days.
Paul Slootman
t; But I don't understand the purpose of the first test where I fixed the
> bashism - why do you only act on the crontab file if the value is zero
> or if it is at least 30? That means that I can't set it to 20 via
> debconf, doesn't it?
You seriously need to study debconf.
tion for a week or so from tomorrow.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun 05 Feb 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> We are still trying to reproduce the bug, as the patch listed in
> #351480 doesn't seem to help :-(
One thing that I noticed: after gid 101, I have 1000 in my /etc/group.
102 comes later.
And group id 102 isn't used in /etc/pass
might allow attackers
> to execute arbitrary code via crafted extended attributes that trigger a
> buffer overflow.
Do you have reason to believe that Debian's rsync 2.6.4-6 has that patch
applied?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frequency defined,
but now the user has removed the /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle file and now
re-runs dpkg-reconfigure.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
> > should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
>
> Because debconf is not a
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that ind
reopen 322009
thanks
On Thu 09 Mar 2006, Paul Slootman wrote:
>* add alternate dependency debconf-2.0.
> closes:#322009
Aaargh, should be 332009.
Reopening now.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Tue 20 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> Please rebuild pppdcapiplugin for ppp 2.4.4b1.
> Expect a NMU if this will not be fixed soon, because it's blocking ppp
> from entering testing.
Go ahead, I'm a bit out of the ISDN stuff at the moment due to
circumstances :-(
thanks,
Paul
--
To UNS
sdnutils is rather large, and maintaining it has become a
team effort (although I confess I need to get a bit more involved...)
Feel free to help ;-)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 04 Jan 2006, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On Mon 02 Jan 2006, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> I can confirm this bug.
> >
> > Did you confirm it with version 3.8.2005-12-06-2 ?
>
> Unfortunately 3.8.2005-12-06-2 doesn't fix
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> In the elif line, this must be $USE_PPP, of course.
Good one.
This looks like it may be _the_ bug...
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le at all, it is not release-critical.
>
> > Line 516, ff:
> > |rm -f nohup.out
> > |nohup chown -R proxy:proxy /var/cache/wwwoffle/. /var/lib/wwwoffle/.
> > >/dev/null 2>&1 &
> > |sleep 1
> > |rm -f nohup.out
> >
> > This deletes nohup.out in the current directory, which could be not from
> > wwwoffle, which could also be created in $HOME, but is not created by nohup
> > anyway because of the redirection.
You missed the "cd /var/cache/wwwoffle/temp" 1 line higher...
> I'll just remove the nohup.out removals.
Why? Again, what has this to do with this bug report?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installat
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - a
he best position to answer this issue.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
te
> of the transfer.
>
> Since I installed 2.6.4, the same command does not perform the
> same:
>
> If a file is deleted in the server, it will be deleted in the client,
> WITHOUT leaving a backup copy.
>
> Expected behaviour: a backup copy should be left in the clie
countered in its cache area. Use a symlink (to a subdir) if
you really have to...
Can you please send me /var/log/wwwoffle-upgrade.log, and
/etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf and /etc/wwwoffle/wwwoffle.conf.bak (i.e.
the config file before the upgrade). Please also show the output of
debconf-show wwwoffle
I&
ry thorough work.
Unfortunately a bit of wasted time as it happens, but thanks anyway.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is is related to #307923. Please add a line
log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
to the top of /etc/rsyncd.conf, and try it again. At least, I'm assuming
you're using an rsync daemon; you give very little information on how
rsync is being used.
If that fixes it, please let me know ASAP so I
On Tue 10 May 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Paul Slootman wrote:
> >
> > I'm guessing this is related to #307923. Please add a line
> > log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
> > to the top of /etc/rsyncd.conf, and try it again. At least, I'm assuming
> >
;>you're using an rsync daemon; you give very little information on how
> >>>rsync is being used.
> >>>
> If you could clarify, should there be a space between log and file?
Yes. (Exactly as shown above.) It should be outside any module
definitions, i.e. at the
es "major security fixes" of
> version 1.0RC3 ("all users should upgrade").
If I don't see any response from the maintainer within a couple of days,
I will NMU version 1.0.0.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o try without the -z option.
You also don't mention what version the remote host is using, please try
to find out.
Note that when using -a, -rt is redundant. Also, -e ssh has been the
default for a long time.
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pre.iL --delete . itaca/benjami/public_html
It should show nothing. If you hit return a number of times it will
complain about a protocol problem. Could you show that?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hought of:
you don't happen to force any commands with the authorized_keys stuff in
ssh? Could you try again with ~/.ssh moved away on the remote side?
Does the system sshd_config perhaps have any particular things relating
to ssh?
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd stop immediately when you run it
non-interactively? If so, that's the problem; rsync.net apparently
forces some command and it doesn't recognize the "e.iL" part which is
new, so it doesn't start the command.
I think you should ask rsync.net to support rsync version 3.0.0.
On Mon 03 Mar 2008, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
>
> In the rsync.net side: I can ask to technical service.
I already sent a message to support@ , hopefully that will give some
useful response.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
rmation?
Does the exact same thing happen as in the original report? Including
the "0 bytes received" message?
These are all i386?
It sucks that I can't reproduce this, I have a number of systems with
different architectures and they all work for me :-/
Paul Slootman
--
To
/kiko/rsync.strace if necessary)
That should then run rsync under strace so that all the system calls
that rsync does is logged in the /tmp/rsync.strace.out file.
It may also be useful to do the same thing, but now use ltrace instead
of strace. That logs all the library calls.
Send the output to
2050
> 13395 strlen(NULL
> 13395 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
> 13395 +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
OK, thanks for this, this should be helpful in finding what's wrong.
Could you do the next couple of extra things, on the receiving side?
/usr/sbin/validlocale en_US.UTF-8
grep -v '^#' /etc/locale.gen
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
security team and thus
> handling testing and unstable issues please contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to check if this is worth a DSA.
Well, then I'm even more surprised that the patch you pasted listed
2.6.4 as the version being patched?!
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
a patch available for 2.6.9 (2.6.9-2etch1 is the current stable
version).
2.6.4 is "oldstable". I think first priority is the stable version...
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem, with an existing but for several weeks
> unreleased patch.
>
> So yes, the bug should be closed, but with a "solved" state.
OK, that's good :-)
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ding an strace log as well (dont' forget -f
option to strace, as rsync forks).
thanks
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
int in time, when wwwoffle creates
> certs it should at least inform about it.
Thanks for this wake up call, wwwoffle was a bit too low on my priority
list :-(
If it can take that much time, then perhaps the generation of the
certificate should be moved to the background or so.
I'll inve
> the package.
>
> If you still intend to maintain the package please reply as soon as possible,
> because by the next weekend I'll ask a sponsor to upload the package.
I've prepared a fixed version, but haven't yet been home to test it.
That should happen today.
Pau
i,
could you send me the generated Makefile? Thanks.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
k, he is very intimate
with the innards of rsync :)
> PS: It's annoying that when a core file gets created that it's written
> in destination path instead of the directory where I started rsync.
Blame Linus :-) It's what the kernel does, rsync has 0.0 influence on
this besid
.9-6 (server)works fine
> 2.6.9-6 (client) ---> 3.0.0-1 (server)fails
> 3.0.0-1 (client) ---> 3.0.0-1 (server)fails
On Tue 04 Mar 2008, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 04/03/2008 at 12:45 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> > Can you try my test version?
> This one work
tag 469172 unreproducible
thanks
On Mon 03 Mar 2008, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> El Dilluns 03 Març 2008, Paul Slootman va escriure:
> > It sucks that I can't reproduce this, I have a number of systems with
> > different architectures and they all work for me :-/
>
>
severity 469172 important
thanks
There is now a 3.0.0-2 version that has the fix for Kiko's problem
(running rsync to a single-use daemon server process).
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s this problem? That would help create a test
> suite entry that will detect this problem at build time.
I've attached the file.
Paul Slootman
W [ \t\r\n\f]
nonascii[\200-\377]
ascii [ -~]
alphanum[a-z0-9]
punct [][!\"#$%&\'(
and trigger the bug. You should then
have a core dump. Then do "gdb /path/to/rsync core" and "bt" to get the
stack backtrace. Alternatively make the core dump available to me.
Hopefully that would help pin down the cause of the error.
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed 25 Feb 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Gtk1.2 will not be shipping with Squeeze so linpopup will either
> > need to be ported to Gtk2 or removed from the archive.
>
> A GTK2 port is available at http://linpopup2.sourceforge.net/
Thanks for that!
I contacted the author (at littleig
same URL simultaneously aren't that large.
In the meantime I'll contact the upstream author and try to resolve the
500 server error response, which, although not quite contrary to the
documentation, is fairly unexpected (especially given the contents of
that page :-)
Thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the
option is for; say "yes" if you want to prevent that.
That said, the error you get when a page is indeed locked, is a bit
unexpected: "This is an internal WWWOFFLE server error that should not
occur." It's after all a documented option...
IMHO the second process should wait for the completion of the first
download process before proceeding; giving an "500 WWWOFFLE Server
Error" is not the right thing to do here...
thanks,
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
included in the version that's to go into
etch.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e that a comment is a "local change" here,
especially as it does not influence the way the package works at all.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 404861 important
thanks
On Fri 29 Dec 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2006-12-28 21:03:57 +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> >> This is I think a question of interpretation;
> >> if the local change modifies
On Fri 27 Oct 2023, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: pixmap
> Version: 2.6.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> o
On Fri 12 Feb 2010, Marcin Trybus wrote:
> Feb 12 18:02:00 localhost mysqld_safe[6407]: ERROR: 1064 You have an error
> in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server
> version for the right syntax to use near 'ALTER TABLE user ADD column
> Show_view_priv enum('N','
On Wed 09 Dec 2009, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> The /var/lib/dpkg/info/wwwoffle.prerm script contains:
>
> set +e # ignore errors while stopping
> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
> if [ -x "/etc/init.d/wwwoffle" ]; then
> if [ -x "`which invoke-rc.d 2>/dev/null`" ]; then
>
On Wed 09 Dec 2009, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> After fixing the prerm script, I've found that the postrm script is
> also buggy:
>
> Removing wwwoffle ...
> Purging configuration files for wwwoffle ...
> find: `/etc/wwwoffle': No such file or directory
> find: `/etc/wwwoffle': No such file or direc
On Sun 06 Dec 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> What's the status? Do you intend to update to linpopup2 for Squeeze
> or shall we remove linpopup from the archive? Given that it's
> obsolete on Windows for a long time (according to Wikipedia it was
> dropped with Windows NT), this seems sensible
On Mon 28 Jan 2013, StalkR wrote:
>
> On squeeze, I failed to compile rsync/unstable from source:
> dpkg-source -x rsync_3.0.9-4.dsc
> cd rsync-3.0.9
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
> [...] errors related to compiler not found.. but after a look at
> config.log it was because not expanding `dpkg
On Thu 02 Dec 2010, Zed Pobre wrote:
>
> The problem resolved down to rsync 3.0.3-2 accepting the following:
>
> rsync rsync://::
>
> and 3.0.7-2 does not.
That 3.0.3-2 accepted that syntax was an "undocumented feature".
Nowhere in the documentation does it say that it is OK to mix rsync://
and
severity 638595 normal
tag 638595 unreproducible
thanks
On Sat 20 Aug 2011, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>
> This can't just be a coincidental bug in libgcrypt11, libgnutls26, lyxn,
> w3m all at the same time. It obviously is a WWWOFFLE bug.
Or your system's memory has a glitch, or whatever.
If it
62 matches
Mail list logo
