Hello Andrius
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:10, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
>
> On 2021-06-02 19:29, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Nauty fails to cross build due to two reasons:
> >
> > 1. It uses AC_RUN_IFELSE testing which cannot heppen during cross build
&g
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #952285 in prometheus-mongodb-exporter reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/prometheus-mongodb-ex
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 12:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> I've merged this and tried a test build including running autopkgtest in
> my pbuilder environment. Unfortunately the latter test is now failing with
>
> ...
> autopkgtest [06:48:10]: test atac-unit-test: [---
> Rewriting
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973747 in python-firehose reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-firehose/-/commit/405f
Hi Tino,
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:21:15 +0100 Tino Didriksen wrote:
> This is a chicken-and-egg problem that should solve itself. New apertium
> 3.7.1 can't migrate until apertium-cy-en is fixed, but fixed apertium-cy-en
> won't build correctly with existing apertium 3.6.1.
On declaring hard depen
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #978266 in pytest-qt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pytest-qt/-/commit/9777edffacfcc7b0
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #978288 in pytest-mock reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pytest-mock/-/commit/c214cc4eeca9
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #980673 in python-babel reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-babel/-/commit/1d6c9a783f
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #980852 in ciftilib reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ciftilib/-/commit/312b522fa41bb55796f832b078bcc7
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #978275 in python-pluggy reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pluggy/-/commit/f5b53b64
Hi,
On Mon, 1 Mar, 2021, 6:13 pm Andreas Tille, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> besides this on arm64[1] and mips64el:
>
> ...
> cd opal && \
> g++ -c -O3 -std=c++11 -march=native opal.cpp
> opal.cpp:9:10: fatal error: immintrin.h: No such file or directory
> 9 | #include // AVX2 and lower
> |
Package: seqsero
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
Seqsero seems to invoke python2.7 during execution, for example here[1]
Similar invocation statements have _not_ been patched out yet in the
d/patches/2to3.patch, probably affecting the funct
Package: fsm-lite
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
fsm-lite forcibly passes -msse4.2 on amd54, which is a baseline
violation.
Please compile for either all SIMD levels from sse4.2 down to base, and
use a selector like simd-dispatch [1]
[1]:
https
Pinging the bug in case the autoremoval warning causes a problem
Hi,
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:53:00 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, I looked into
> the history of your autopkgtest [1] and I noticed version 1.5.3-2 fails
> regularly on amd64, while sporadically a rerun passes. I copied some of
> the output at the botto
On 4/6/21 12:29 AM, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Paul, Hi Nilesh,
> feel also free to grant dm rights if you feel
> appropriate.
Done
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #972773 in python-ciso8601 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ciso8601/-/commit/82579f4393b324e3
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973018 in python-etelemetry reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-etelemetry/-/commit/303123902ec7
Hi Håvard
Looks like you've fixed this, but not uploaded yet.
Is there anything missing, or should I upload this one?
Regards,
Nilesh
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:09:50 + =?UTF-8?B?SMOldmFyZCBGbGFnZXQgQWFzZW4=?=
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #978279 in afew reported by you
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 19:31, Håvard Flaget Aasen
wrote:
> Hi Nilesh
>
> The reason I haven't uploaded is because I'm not a DD, so I don't have
> the necessary permissions.
>
I see that you are a DM, If you agree to add yourself to the uploader's
field, I'll happily grant permissions.
> I beli
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 20:48, Håvard Flaget Aasen
wrote:
>
> >
> > I see that you are a DM, If you agree to add yourself to the uploader's
> > field, I'll happily grant permissions.
>
> Thanks! I updated, and included myself in the uploader's field.
>
Done, please upload :-)
Hi Joshua,
Many thanks for fixes,
The freeze has started and soft freeze time is near as well.(2 weeks from now)
OpenMx has removals of a bunch of packages from testing.
Hence, please consider doing a new upstream release if it looks okay to you.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Des
Hi Tino,
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 01:13:56 +0100 Tino Didriksen wrote:
> apertium-ukr should be removed from Debian. The pair that needed it has
> been upgraded to bundle the required version instead:
If you agree, can I retitle and reassign to file in a removal bug for
apertium-ukr, then?
Also, I do
Hi Julian,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:58:29 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: spyder
> > Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> > a source upload is needed for
Hi Julian,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 06:58:29 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: spyder
> > Version: 3.3.6+dfsg1-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Since binNMUs are not possible for binary-all packages,
> > a source upload is needed for
Hi Julian
I read through the rest of the thread.
On Mon, 1 Feb, 2021, 6:31 pm Julian Gilbey, wrote:
> I have a package of Spyder 4 waiting to upload, but it requires five
> packages to be accepted into unstable from NEW first (pyls-server,
> pyls-black, pyls-spyder, abydos, textdistance); once
Hi Etienne,
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:16:30 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I prepared a targeted patch to fix Gcc-10 issues with sparskit,
> and ran the embedded ./dotests to make sure it did not introduce
> any errors. This fixes the argument typ
Thank you, Julien! :-)
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:49:37 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> Source: spyder
> Source-Version: 4.2.1+dfsg1-1
> Done: Julian Gilbey
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> spyder, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #982169 in biomaj3-process reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/biomaj3-process/-/commit/f1e8f5d38eea1d73
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #982168 in biomaj3-daemon reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/biomaj3-daemon/-/commit/63f5967099b47c4e6d
Control: Severity -1 important
Hi Etienne,
Thanks for filing ROM --RM. I'm lowering the severity so it migrates to testing.
Nilesh
Control: severity -1 minor
It looks like this is fixed:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=teem&arch=amd64&ver=1.12.0%7E20160122-4&stamp=1606151763&raw=0
Hence lowering the severity
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:10:20 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: teem
> Version: 1.12.0~20160122-2
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:08:58 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier
wrote:
> I tried to reproduce the bug by building igdiscover 0.11-3 using
> sbuild in a clean Sid chroot which did include pytest 6:
>
> $ schroot -c unstable-amd64-sbuild -d / \
> -- apt-cache show python3-pytest \
> | grep Versi
Control: severity -1 minor
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:39:40 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.79.1 (22 April 2020) on debian
>
>
++
> | golang-github-shenwei356-bwt 0.0
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #975788 in python-babel reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-babel/-/commit/7f57b7ccd2
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #976105 in golang-github-tidwall-buntdb reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-tidwa
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #975467 in psignifit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/psignifit/-/commit/235a7fc6b9b5b0ce7e891a36127f
Relevant part (hopefully):
> > dpkg-buildpackage
> > -
> >
> > Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package python-parasail
> > dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.2.1-1
> > dpkg-buildpackage: inf
; Relevant part (hopefully):
>> dpkg-buildpackage
>> -
>>
>> Command: dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -sa -rfakeroot
>> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package python-parasail
>> dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.2.1-1
>> dpkg-buildpackage: in
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/jeffdaily/parasail-python/issues/56
Forwarded the issue upstream, hopefully we will have a fix soonish with
arm64 becoming more popular.
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:48:52 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> So after wasting my time here I finally realized that apparently
> boltdb is archived upstream. It will not receive any fixes.
>
> Apparently golang-github-coreos-bbolt is a maintained feature-extended
> f
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #973099 in python-boltons reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-boltons/-/commit/67b59b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #976578 in golang-github-labstack-gommon reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-labs
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 15:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to fix the issue by making dh_shlibdeps work. In
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/commit/366edd672be428cc553b34b99bc614aa698175d6
>
> I documented what I tried but all fail
Sandro,
Looks like Yunqiang has a patch that fixed the problem.
Can you add this patch and upload?
Would you allow them to NMU? (See the mail below)
Thanks,
-Nilesh
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:58:34 +0800 Yunqiang Su wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 18:23:13 +0800 YunQiang Su wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jan
Hi peter,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:10:35 + peter green wrote:
> Package: arachne-pnr
> Version: 0.1+20190728gitc40fb22-2
> Tags: bookworm, sid
> Severity: serious
>
> arachne-pnr build-depends on fpga-icestorm-chipdb which is no longer built by
> the fpga-icestorm source package,
Admittedly,
36:01.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dulwich (0.20.31-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix variable name in testsuite (Closes: #1003017)
+
+ -- Nilesh Patra Sat, 29 Jan 2022 23:36:01 +
+
dulwich (0.20.31-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream relea
r-perl
+ * d/tests/pkg-perl/SKIP: skip build-deps and syntax.t
++ build-deps is skipped since it seems to be tested on itself
++ syntax.t: One check on titanium/Modules.pm needs fixing upstream
+
+ -- Nilesh Patra Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:24:46 +0530
+
libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl (0.44-1)
Source: python-duckpy
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
python-duckpy has a missing dependency on python3-h2 which is uncovered
by a non-superficial autopkgtest committed to salsa[1]
As can be seen in the corresponding pipeline, it fails with dep
Package: resfinder
Version: 3.2-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
resfinder currently test-depends on python3-distutils,
however it really, really should "Depend" on python3-distutils for
there is an import call in the main file
resfinder.py:15:from distutils.s
Package: virulencefinder
Version: 2.0.3+git20190809.dde157a-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
virulencefinder currently test-depends on python3-distutils,
however it really, really should "Depend" on python3-distutils for
there is an import call in the main file
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Matthias,
I admit that I do not get any failures on build, same for several other
bugs, for instance #978784
I've triple-checked that my environment is updated, and I'm using
version 2.71-2 of autoconf
Are these somehow false-positive in any case?
If so, will there
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 13:08:57 +0200 Ole Streicher wrote:
> Package: python3-astroquery
> Version: 0.4.1+dfsg-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> The unit tests of astrquery errors with astropy version 4.3.1 which is
> currently in unstable. Could you please update astroquery to the lat
Hi Ole,
Can I ask you to fix this with sunpy soonish? This is one of the reasons
for keeping sunpy out of testing too
Nilesh
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:20:47 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -2 python3-sunpy 3.0.1-3
> Control: retitle
On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 15:38:00 +0200 Steffen Moeller wrote:
> Package: python3-skbio
> Version: 0.5.6-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Unpacking python3-skbio (0.5.6-4) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/python3-skbio_0.5.6-4_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> tryin
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 01:09, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently tried to update astroquery.
> Indeed, version 0.4.3 solves the issue, but it introduces another bug
> that prevents uploading.
> I reported it upstream.
> Patching the current version would probably be more efficient than
> waiting for ups
Hi Jeremy,
On 9/8/21 8:24 PM, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
>> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/978891
>
> Try this patch.
Thank you very much, works perfectly!
I just uploaded with your patch applied.
Nilesh
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1002969 in golang-github-smallstep-certificates reported by you has been
fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-git
Tony/Tom, Can you do corresponding fixes for unstable too,
or otherwise move experimental release to unstable?
Otherwise this bug is causing a un-warranted-for autorm, for example in
parsnp[1]
[1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/parsnp
Regards,
Nilesh
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 16:03:40 + Debian
On 2/18/22 6:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I updated singularity-container in Salsa to the latest available CE
release and added some new Build-Depends. Unfortunately it does not
build as you can see in salsa-ci[1]. Any help to get the package build
is welcome. I pers
On 2/19/22 2:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:31:23PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
| dh_fixperms
| chown -c root.root debian/singularity-container/usr/lib/*/singularity/bin/*
| chown: changing ownership of
'debian/singularity-container/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/singul
Hi Salvatore,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 08:01:34PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >[ Andreas Tille ]
> >* Team upload.
> >* Version > 3.6.x are closing CVE-2021-33622
> > Closes: #990201
>
> Can you help isolate on that?
> https://support.sylabs.io/support/solutions/articles/
Hi again,
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 01:03:13 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > So where has this issue bin fixed?
>
> But yes, you are right, even at Mitre metadata, I do not find any information
> about any patch for the bug; i.e. I do not see the "code" that fixes it, and
>
On 2/24/22 3:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please consider releasing rdflib v6 which in my brief testing is
compatible with pyparser v3.
I tried to follow your suggestion to upgrade rdflib to version 6 in Git.
Unfortunately I'm stumbling upon a different issue in the new test
suite[1].
One real
On 2/24/22 6:00 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
One really odd thing I noticed is that there is no dh_auto_build is overridden
but not triggered inside it again,
and so dh_auto_build happening at all.
^
Wow, in a hurry I wrote really sloppy english there
I meant
On 2/24/22 6:10 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way
advanced which I learned in bug #995675. This leaves the question how
we can proceed. It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like
this to learn about packages that are broken.
Source: python-prov
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@jones.dk
Hi Jonas,
With recent upload of rdflib, python-prov fails its autopkgtest as
seen here[1]
(I did not paste logs as this clutters my terminal really)
It is also FTBFS since it runs the same tests at bu
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:02:54 + Janos LENART wrote:
> I'll get on this. Thanks.
Janos, Any updates on this?
There is a patch as well in this email[1]
Can you please apply and upload?
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000980#31
Regards,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description
Hi Paul,
On 3/2/22 9:09 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 02-03-2022 14:58, Nilesh Patra wrote:
@Paul, could you please help reproduce this in the debci environment and
help us with any clues as to what might be wrong?
The autopkgtest command line is at the top of each log.
I am aware, and I use
Hi Paul,
On 3/2/22 11:51 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I tried re-triggering it to check once again but looks like runners are not up
unfortunately.
You mean the salsa ones, right?
Yes
And so if you could trigger a test suite for this package at your end once, and
help debug it,
that'd be reall
> python3-unicodedata2 has disappeared from the NEW queue, has it been
> rejected?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-unicodedata2
> Can we go back to 4.28.5-1 ?
Not needed now, thanks to Sean for processing it in time
Regards,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1005479 in toil reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/toil/-/commit/08345ef6f6eb56dd41a25fb1550c2ef024610
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1005479 in toil reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/toil/-/commit/08345ef6f6eb56dd41a25fb1550c2ef024610
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I was finally able to make time and do this. I first ran
>
> admin@ci-worker08:/tmp/toil$ apt source toil/unstable
>
> admin@ci-worker08:/tmp/toil/toil-5.6.0$ autopkgtest --shell --shell-fail .
> -- lxc --sudo autopkgtest-unstable-i38
control: fixed -1 5.3.5+dfsg-4
control: close -1
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 16:09:55 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
> you please investigate the situation and fix it?
This has been fixed with my latest upload, everything is green now.
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:17:08 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This is due to:
>
> (sid_armhf-dchroot)bunk@amdahl:~$ python3
> Python 3.9.10 (main, Jan 16 2022, 17:12:18)
> [GCC 11.2.0] on linux
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> import mappy
> T
control: reassign -1 toil
control: found -1 5.6.0-2
control: fixed -1 5.6.0-4
control: close -1
On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 19:41:25 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> [0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log
> file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from
> u
Hi again, Paul.
On 3/10/22 6:28 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
I was finally able to make time and do this. I first ran
admin@ci-worker08:/tmp/toil$ apt source toil/unstable
admin@ci-worker08:/tmp/toil/toil-5.6.0$ autopkgtest --shell
Hi Mo,
On 2/23/22 11:01 AM, M. Zhou wrote:
Hello guys. Finally it's all green on our release architectures
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=onetbb&suite=experimental
I shall request the slot for transition once finished the rebuild
of its reverse dependencies and filed FTBFS bugs
On 3/14/22 11:51 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:13:50AM + schrieb Torrance, Douglas:
On Sun 13 Mar 2022 04:50:32 PM EDT, M. Zhou wrote:
Recently I'm not able to test the build of libtbb-dev's reverse dependencies
as my build machine was out of access. That blocks
On 19 March 2022 1:56:17 pm IST, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
>Hi Nilesh,
>
>[…]
>> Would it be possible to add a hint to ignore arm64 autopkgtest suite?
>
>BTW I think this is possible already in the autopkgtest definition [1] by
>adding an Architecture: section and leaving out arm64 in the list o
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 02:32:12PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
>
> For avoidance of doubt, the canonical definition lives in the autopkgtest
> package:
> https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.packa
On 25 March 2022 4:51:44 pm IST, hardpenguin13 wrote:
>Was also affected by this, ended up removing affected nodejs packages and
>installing them again. No attempt to overwrite reported by dpkg.
Same, I saw this yesterday and the same workaround worked.
control: reassign -1 r-cran-tmb/1.7.22-1
Hi Dirk,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:30:10 -0600 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> passfail
> | rmatrixfrom testing1.4-0-1
> | r-cran-tmb from testing1.7.22-1
> | all others from test
On 12/28/21 12:36 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Version: 9.4-1
Hi,
memory-allocator passed NEW now.
I just did a source-upload for memory-allocator with a bit of polishing.
sagemath autopkgtests are failing which do not look exactly because of
memory-allocator,
taking a look locally.
Kind Regard
forwarded -1 https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/shasta/issues/274
Hopefully upstream fixes it soonish
Regards,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Mike,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:16:12 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: hfd-service
> Version: 0.1.0-3
> Severity: serious
> > -- No package 'libhardware' found
> > CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:22 (message):
> > Bulding without libhybris support, missing required dependencies!
> >
> >
Andreas,
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 09:07:08 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/simd-everywhere/simde/issues/936
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm able to reproduce this issue in a local pbuilder chroot and have
> forwarded the issue upstream.
Quoting Mich
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:53:01 +0530 Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 09:07:08 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 upstream
> > Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/simd-everywhere/simde/issues/936
>
loses: #1003561)
+
+ -- Nilesh Patra Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:33:40 +0530
+
python-sop (0.2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru python-sop-0.2.0/debian/patches/fix-test-with-new-mypy.patch
python-sop-0.2.0/debian/patches/fix-test-with-new-mypy.patch
--- python-sop-
control: reopen -1
control: found -1 python-cooler/0.8.11
control: severity -1 important
On 9 December 2021 2:23:11 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>I think you did not really re-opened the bug (since it was not in CC) -
Oops, yeah I missed that. Typing emails on phone isn't very optimal as it seem
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1001410 in python-csb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-csb/-/commit/5f050a4f584824ac68e93fae7
control: notfound -1 r-cran-satellite/1.0.4-1
control: fixed -1 r-cran-raster/3.5-9-1
The new release fixes things for me locally, I will check debci
and close the bug when debci runs the tests.
Please hold on until then.
Regards,
Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Tong,
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:12:20 -0500 Tong Sun
wrote:
> The Debian FTP Masters explains that it means "DMs may not upload
> packages going to NEW. Need to use a sponsor for those".
If your changes are updated in salsa, I could help you with sponsoring.
Let me know if you'd like some help
On 12/11/21 2:30 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
Oh, thanks a lot Nilesh!
Everything is updated on salsa. pls double check, e.g.:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab/-/commit/4cd8db27cec918244a9fba3d698a7b0123c9f3f9
Just one query: you reason for moving to contrib is not entirely clear to me.
You wrote
Hey Tong,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:05:03PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> dbab moving to contrib is because of this Bug#1001009. I personally have no
> idea, but as requested by Andrey.
>
> I guess it is about this line that is called from the postinst script
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab/-/
control: notfixed -1 r-cran-raster/3.5-9-1
Hi Robert,
On 12/11/21 12:10 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 12/10/21 11:43 PM, Robert J. Hijmans wrote:
The new release of raster should first update terra if indeed it finds an older
version. So let's hope I am right.
I just uploaded the new ve
On 12/11/21 12:14 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
control: notfixed -1 r-cran-raster/3.5-9-1
Hi Robert,
On 12/11/21 12:10 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On 12/10/21 11:43 PM, Robert J. Hijmans wrote:
The new release of raster should first update terra if indeed it finds an older
version. So let's h
Hi Tong,
On 12/12/21 1:06 AM, Tong Sun wrote:
Thank you Nilesh for such detailed explanation. Weighted on all the
options, I decided it still needs to go to contrib and have put a note
in d/README.Debian --
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbab/-/commit/fa771322e1342c532637e17baa863cca8ac80488
On 11 December 2021 8:53:04 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Am Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 02:33:40PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>> On 12/11/21 12:14 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> > Tests are still failing, see here[1]. It is not a problem of terra
>> > version, as it seems, it i
101 - 200 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
