package apt-cacher
notfound 792206 1.7.11
thanks
Control: reassign -1 liblcms2-2 2.14-1
Control: affects -1 colord
I hit this FTBFS today.
The gdb backtrace of the failing test is
Thread 1 "colord-test-pri" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x77bd359a in cmsMLUtranslationsCodes () from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblcms2.so.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Simon,
Many thanks for this.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:58:49 +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > For desktops to be installable on such systems, policykit-1
Source: util-linux
Version: 2.35.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Thanks for packaging the new version of util-linux.
Unfortunately the testsuite fails when building in a pbuilder/cowbuilder
chroot. In particular misc/fallocate and misc/mountpoint.
The iss
-dev package symlinks in /usr/lib target shared libraries in
+/lib. (Closes: #985509).
+
+ -- Mark Hindley Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:16:00 +0100
+
openrc (0.42-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in
openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.lin
Paul,
Many thanks for this.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:51:18AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
> aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
> doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I
Package: colord
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Dear Maintainer,
colord 1.4.5-1 fails to build from source on (at least) i386.
Summary of Failures:
1/4 colord-test-private FAIL 2.94s (killed by signal 6 SIGABRT)
Thanks.
Mark
Control: reassign -1 src:colord 1.4.5-1
Of course this would be better assigned to the source package.
Mark
control: tags -1 pending
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 02:12:54PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I think the symlink setup is overly complicated by using both
> /lib and /usr/lib. You should either move everything to /lib
> (if that is really required for compatibility with libsystemd0)
> or just rest
Salvatore,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:14:59AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Thanks for the quick fix!
>
> Note there is a typo in the CVE, should have been CVE-2022-25643.
Evidently too quick!
Thanks for pointing it out.
Would you prefer a new upload to fix it now or wait for the next ro
Package: cluster-glue
Version: 1.0.12-20
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
src:cluster-glue FTBFS in unstable as the build dependency on libltdl3-dev is no
longer available.
Thanks.
Mark
-- System Infor
Control: tags -1 pending
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This has now been fixed in apt 1.9.4 (experimental).
I propose to add
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is
> > apt's
>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:06:57AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I looked I elogind a while back I was able to build a package without
> having a public libelogind0, I basically had that in my debian/rules file:
>
> # We only build the libelogind0 and libelogind-dev if we are
Laurent,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:29:43PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Can't this be stubbed or mocked on the elogind side?
I presume you mean slices here? (I am not sure that slices are the only
difference in implementation, but let's ignore that for now).
To be honest, I am not sure. P
Laurent,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:06:57AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I looked I elogind a while back I was able to build a package without
> having a public libelogind0, I basically had that in my debian/rules file:
>
> # We only build the libelogind0 and libelogind-dev
Julian,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:28:55PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I don't think it's reasonable to ship this package with C/R/P
> > libsystemd0.
>
> I understand that you don't like it. However, for libelogind0 to export the
> same
> symbol
Control: tags -1 - pending
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:30:00PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > On irc he also said there was little point in adding the Breaks: as apt
> > doesn't
> > rexec itself.
>
> Yes, e
Cristian,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> I'm interested in this, but my systems (unstable and testing) are in a
> slightly different state. Let's take unstable, for example:
Thanks for this. However, I really don't see it as relating to Simon's origi
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 06:51:16PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > Would you, please, start a new bug for this unless you really think
> > it is the same issue (apt being broken by continuing to uninstall
> > libsystemd0 after systemd prerm fails) and I will be happy to help.
>
> I re
Sam,
Many thanks for this.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:58:18AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Mark> I have tried the approach suggested by Laurent of using
Mark> elogind with libsystemd0 and I could not get the sd-*(3) APIs
Mark> to function correctly.
> What trouble did you run into?
That sd-l
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:03:57PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Foo-package depends on the latest libsystemd0. I'm running unstable or
> testing. The latest libsystemd0 isn't building on my arch yet. But
> elogind is simpler and has build fine on my arch. I install foo-package
> and suddenly end
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:34:50PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hi.
> I've looked a bit at the systemd code as compared to the elogind code.
>
> One of the major reasons that libsystemd0 cannot be used as a
> replacement for libelogind0 is that elogind does not have compatible
> cgroup naming.
> Th
Ian,
Thanks for this.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:28:29AM +0800, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 10:16 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Would it be any help at all of the "dbus client-ish" bits and the
> "direct API-ish" bits of the two libraries were
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:16:05PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Mark> Anyway, I am happy to try to work up a dpkg-divert solution if
> Mark> that is likely to be more acceptable.
>
> I don't know if it will be.
> I'm trying to be a facilitator here and make sure all sides understand
> each
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:09:15PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > libelogind0 can be coninstalled with libsystemd0. However, it is fragile
> > because
> > the file that needs to be diverted out of the way is libsys
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:11:47AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Triggers may be an answer to the libsystemd soversion issue.
>
> Mind that anything that runs between unpacking the new libsystemd0
> and running
Sam,
Since I cannot get a working and robust dpkg-divert solution, I feel the need to
revisit the validity of these concerns.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:03:57PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Hindley writes:
> >> If we are going to use
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:52:27PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > It is possible to get APT to attempt a solution by specifically requesting
> > 'apt
> > install libelogind0 sysvinit-core'. This removes systemd-
Sam,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:19:10AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Hindley writes:
>
> Mark> Sam, Since I cannot get a working and robust dpkg-divert
> Mark> solution, I feel the need to revisit the validity of these
>
Julien,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So one thing I think we should ensure is we don't end up uninstalling
> systemd without an explicit user choice.
>
> The "init" package has the "Important: yes" control field which as I
> understand it tells apt to behave l
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:19:10AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> So one thing I think we should ensure is we don't end up uninstalling
> systemd without an explicit user choice.
Julien,
I appreciate that you are suggesting some addit
Cristian,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> > 1. install sysvinit-core; that removes systemd-sysv but nothing else
> >systemd related
>
> > Souldn't that work?
>
> It would, if but for libpam-systemd
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This is now resolved in apt version 1.8.4 which is in both sid and bullseye.
Package: libpoppler46
Version: 0.26.5-2+deb8u12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I have just upgraded to libpoppler46 version 0.26.5-2+deb8u12 (from +deb8u11)
which has just appeared in jessie-security.
The new version causes xpdf to segfault.
Starting pr
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:37:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Mark Hindley writes:
>
> > Since this upload was an LTS NMU, I should have copied you in.
>
> Thanks for the report. It looks like the fix for CVE-2019-10871 might be
> broken, and I might have to revert this chan
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 08:32:46PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 241.3-1+debian2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> I’m using a scheme in which I store ssh-agent and gpg-agent information
> across all logins (local X session or ssh or
Control: severity -1 important
Thorsten,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:10:03PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > This behaviour is configurable via RemoveIPC in /etc/elogind/logind.conf.
> > See
>
> > Perhaps you could confirm that this configuration change provides the
> > behaviour
> > you want
Andreas
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 07:00:53PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> you probably need to take care of the config files installed by older
> versions, here I could still trigger the bug on upgrades from squeeze to
> wheezy to jessie to stretch to buster.
Thanks for pointing this out. Just
control: tags -1 pending
Package: libelogind-dev-doc
Tags: pending
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:21:47PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: libelogind-dev-doc
> Version: 239.3-3+debian1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 08:10:09AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Control: reopen 916750
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:39:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Package: libelogind-dev-doc
> > Version: 239.3-4+debian1
> >
> > Closing manually as upload had typo in bug num
Package: elogind
Version: 239.3+20190131-1+debian1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 241.3-1+debian1
Control: block -1 by 934132
Reproducible builds of src:elogind 239.3+20190131-1+debian1 in bullseye
have FTBFS for the last few days. This seems to be related to the
migration of gcc-9 to bullsey
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 11:33:55AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> The issue appears to be the STRING_FOREACH macro and was fixed in
> systemd in v241:
Sorry, that should be FOREACH_STRING macro.
Mark
Control: tags -1 - sid
Andreas,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:21:13PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> tags 939101 + sid bullseye
Actually, this isn't present in sid AFAICS.
Thanks
Mark
Julien,
Thank you.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> -UID: 41176
>
> Package: libelogind0
> Version: 241.3-1+debian1
> Severity: serious
>
> I wrote this in #934132 but that is being ignored so I'll repeat here.
Sam,
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:15:58AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I reached out to jcristau to talk about his block hint.
> Based on our IRC discussion, it sounds like he was having trouble
> bringing himself to remove the hint presumably because he doesn't think
> the broader issue was
Julien,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I would hope we can all accept those. If so, there is no requirement for a
> manual block: at the moment there are RC bugs which prevent migration. If or
> when they are resolved migration can occur based on the rele
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: retitle -1 libseat-dev: libseat.pc contains unnecessary
Requires.private: libsystemd
Braiam,
Thanks for this.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 08:32:22PM -0400, Braiam Peguero wrote:
> pkgconfig/libseat.pc includes dependency on libsystemd:
>
> $ cat /usr/lib/x86_
Niko,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 09:26:12PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> [apt-cacher maintainers: the context here is that URI.pm introduced an
> optional dependency on Regexp::IPv6 by requiring it in an eval block,
> but the apt-cacher __DIE__ handler exits when the require fails.]
Thanks for includin
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 07:31:48AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Corresponding untested patch against apt-cacher attached.
>
> The problem with this approach is that errors from apt-cacher's own evals will
> be skipped as well.
I think the patch below might be a
Control: tags -1 patch
Georges,
I have bumped into this issue as well.
A patch to fix is below.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 88e5b316d6ad0587226e17b010d7c43e75d4815d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:50:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] d/control: move adduser depende
Andreas,
On Tue Aug 30 23:05:59 2022 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #1009915
> Control: found -1 3.05-1
>
> Hi,
>
> there seems to be one manpage (in bootlogd) missing conflict handling:
>
> /usr/share/man/fr/man8/bootlogd.8.gz
Thanks. I was under the impression that manpages-i10
Control: tags -1 pending
Simon,
Thanks for this.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 01:15:42PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 13:12:07 +, Debian Bug Tracking System forwarded:
> > * d/rules: specify PATH for build so unmerg
Klaus,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:16:33PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Package: lsb-base
> Version: 11.3
> Severity: critical
>
> The new package breaks monin as it does not provide
> /lib/lsb/init-functions anymore.
This file has been moved to sysvinit-utils. Which version of that do you have
i
-linux-locales 2.33.1-0.1+devuan1~beowulf2
-- no debconf information
>From 03a585290d86b74d4861e11569c426362c8b853c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:25:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix test/misc/swaplabel failure due to change in mkswap
behaviour.
mkswap
t upstream, so everything is
in one place. Hope that is OK.
Best wishes
Mark
>From b2e6485bbb9e9ce1929d8ba4a3aa0965a52cd52f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 20:25:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix test/misc/swaplabel failure due to change in mkswap
behaviour.
mkswap
Ansgar,
Thanks for this.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:27:20PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> Package: libelogind0
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: serious
>
> libelogind0's `Provides: libsystemd0` causes unrelated packages to
> fail to build due to unmet dependencies. See [1] for an example.
>
> T
Ansgar,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:43:52PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 17:45 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I am struggling to understand how libelogind0 came to be installed in the
> > build
> > in the first place. Can you help me understand that?
>
&
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Is it still the case that the buildds use aptitude for resolving
> dependencies on experimental builds? Because aptitude might be even
> more "creative" than apt in that regards.
Thanks. That is one for Anga
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Ansgar wrote:
>
> > package), so the problem might also be the `Provides: logind` in
> > libpam-elogind.
>
> Shouldn’t the package dependencies on default-logind | logind
> handle thi
Control: reassign -1 apt-cudf
Dear apt-cudf maintainers,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:43:52PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 17:45 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I am struggling to understand how libelogind0 came to be installed in the
> > build
> > in the firs
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/elogind/elogind/issues/177
Thorsten,
Many thanks for this.
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 01:30:53AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@m
Lucas,
I am afraid I still cannot reproduce this.
I attach my successful .buildinfo. What are the differences to yours?
Thanks
Mark
Format: 1.0
Source: insserv
Binary: insserv insserv-dbgsym
Architecture: amd64
Version: 1.24.0-1
Checksums-Md5:
3c928ff0990c2942950fa368b3978086 79480 insserv-dbg
info: source changed by Mark Hindley
dpkg-source --before-build .
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
- fakeroot debian/rules clean
-echo -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/home/mark/insserv-1.24.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-pro
Helmut,
Thanks for this.
libpam-elogind-compat was used when elogind was first introduced as a
hack to circumvent missing dependencies and allow testing. I think all
suitable dependencies now use default-logind | logind. I will check that
is correct. If it is, libpam-elogind-compat could just
Control: block -1 1055562
Helmut,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:39:23AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I think all suitable dependencies now use default-logind | logind. I will
> check that is correct. If it is, libpam-elogind-compat could just be
> removed. It was never availabl
Package: udev
Version: 254.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks unrelated software, causes boot failure on some systems
Dear systemd Maintainers,
As reported in the follow-up to #1052116[1], udev's postinst uses update-rc.d's
-f option which breaks the transition of /etc/init.d/udev to bin
Control: reassign -1 libpgtcl
Control: retitle -1 libpgtcl not installed in default Tcl search path.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 08:09:48PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: pfm
> Version: 2.0.8-3
> Severity: grave
>
> pfm doesn't do anything useful here, it just produces a message popup
> sayi
="/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin"
HOME="/nonexistent" dpkg-genchanges -S > ../insserv_1.24.0-1_source.changes
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package insserv
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 1.24.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
dpkg-buildpack
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Ian
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:33:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Mark Hindley writes ("Bug#1052942: insserv: FTBFS: insserv: Could not read
> script nolsbheader: No such file or directory"):
> > Thanks for this. However, I am currently u
Control: notfound -1 1.2.6-3
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:40:40PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #1061493
> Control: found -1 1.2.6-3.1~exp1
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tag -1 ftbfs
>
> This change causes consolekit2 to to FTBFS in experimental:
Indeed. As it was
Control: severity -1 normal
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:58:34AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:09:59PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Michael and Steve,
> >
> > I would appreciate some help here.
>
> Bump to reset autoremove timer.
Sti
Control: severity -1 normal
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:43:41PM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Whilst I am not an expert on this transition or the abi-compliance-checker, a
> quick look at the logs[1] suggests this is a tool configuration issue and
> src:consolekit2 may not require t64
ommit/0d78d1e4bf5ab3ce11678005b220aac0cfc5bee5
>From f50131bcb98802a66dcc1ee4cc952ca1cc9f8ff4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:13:27 +
Subject: [PATCH] Import upstream patch to fix embedded mocklibc subproject
FTBFS with gcc 14.
---
...e-print_indent-functio
Control: severity -1 normal
Preventing autoremoval due to uninstallable dpkg-dev version in testing.
Mark
Axel,
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 01:05:15PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> P.S.: Given that Christian's NMU doesn't even touch the maintainer
> scripts, I suspect that this issue is also present in version 1.4. I
> though didn't notice it before then, so it might be related to recent
> elogind changes,
Lorenzo,
Thanks for the reminder.
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:10:57PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote:
> Is this is a duplicate of #950986?
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950986
> I bet the patch there would fix this bug too
Embarrassingly, that is my patch which I clearly have no recol
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Michael and Steve,
I would appreciate some help here.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:33:40AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:43:41PM +0000, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Whilst I am not an expert on this tr
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:09:59PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Michael and Steve,
>
> I would appreciate some help here.
Bump to reset autoremove timer.
Mark
Thanks for this. Could you give me a bit more info:
Are you using checksumming?
Can you send the debug output of one of the 'stuck' retrievals
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 01:03:49PM -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
> When upstream server is caught mid-sync and apt-cacher downloads only
> a partial file,
severity 447646 important
thanks
Since there is a workaround using the No-Cache option, I propose to
downgrade this to important
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 1.6.3
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
Locking of checksum database recovery is broken in 1.6.3 causing a hang.
Serverity to prevent Testing migration.
Fix upload is pending
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
24b9d
Author: Mark Hindley
Date: Mon Mar 16 09:03:59 2009 +
Possible fix for #519896.
DB logging controlled with log_set_config in libdb-4.7
diff --git a/apt-cacher-lib-cs.pl b/apt-cacher-lib-cs.pl
index bff07aa..83feed9 100755
--- a/apt-cacher-lib-cs.pl
+++ b/apt-cach
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:56:11AM +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Coin,
>
> Quoting "Mark Hindley" :
>
>> Could you try this patch.
>
> Just moved the complaint to the log_set_config() line.
Sorry, they have changed the fla
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# apt-cacher (1.6.9) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Rescan cached files after checking for diff_Index parents (closes: #537189)
# * Fix handling of Keep-Alive and multiple hosts in path_map. Debugging by
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# apt-cacher (1.6.9) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Rescan cached files after checking for diff_Index parents (closes: #537189)
# * Fix initscript for dependency based boot sequencing. Patch from Petter
R
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# apt-cacher (1.6.9) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Rescan cached files after checking for diff_Index parents (closes: #537189)
# * Fix initscript for dependency based boot sequencing. Patch from Petter
R
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# apt-cacher (1.6.9) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Rescan cached files after checking for diff_Index parents (closes: #537189)
# * Fix initscript for dependency based boot sequencing. Patch from Petter
R
Michael,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:24:19AM +, mwhud...@debian.org wrote:
> Source: consolekit2
> Version: 1.2.6-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch pending
> Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: time-t
This patch appears to be broken and
Whilst I am not an expert on this transition or the abi-compliance-checker, a
quick look at the logs[1] suggests this is a tool configuration issue and
src:consolekit2 may not require t64 migration.
Can you clarify?
Thanks
Mark
[1]
https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-03T09:18:00/
Helmut,
Thanks for this
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:27:41AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: initscripts
> Version: 3.08-3~bpo12+1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: fileconflict
> Control: affects -1 + util-linux
> Tags: bookworm
>
> initscripts has an undec
reassign 598469 apt-cacher-ng
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:14:52AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I run ftp.uk.debian.org, and recently noticed that I was getting hourly
> spikes of connections. On investigation, it seems that a particular
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:27:09AM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Version: 1.7.10
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 9.1.4
>
> In inetd mode apt-cacher is run as www-data user, who does not
> have permission to create /var/run/apt-cacher directory. This
> makes apt-c
package apt-cacher
tag 786661 pending
thanks
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:53:52AM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Mark Hindley pisze:
>
> Yes, this work, but I think this might be considered as rather insecure
> use of /tmp. You can consider changing init script instead or in
>
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:53:52AM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
> diff --git a/init.d/apt-cacher b/init.d/apt-cacher
> index 2c38b7f..46500f9 100755
> --- a/init.d/apt-cacher
> +++ b/init.d/apt-cacher
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
>DESC="Apt-Cacher"
>NAME=apt-cacher
>DAEMON=/usr/sbin/$NAM
Could you try/critique this initscript patch for me, please.
Thanks.
Mark
diff --git a/debian/apt-cacher.init b/debian/apt-cacher.init
index 2c38b7f..7ae1636 100644
--- a/debian/apt-cacher.init
+++ b/debian/apt-cacher.init
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sb
ocess /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Thanks. I think the patch below fixes it. I have queued it for the next
release.
Mark
commit 54efcd73bc195f1917f7b4c3313d2da2de9d7f40
Author: Mark Hindley
Date: Mon Jan 30 11:34:14 2012 +
Check for existence of libcurl.pl in prerm. In the case o
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:13:45PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Version: 1.7.3~rc4
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Severity: grave
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> *some* clients fail to download packages. Some are pure Squeeze, others
> inc
package apt-cacher
tag 662737 pending
severity 662737 normal
thanks
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 01:35:57PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Update - Mark Hindley pointed out that my use of rsync to add packages
> from /var/cache/apt/archives on client boxen had imported *.deb packages
> owne
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
