Package: xdrawchem
Version: 1.9.8-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for openbabel >= 1.100.2... Package openbabel was not found in the
pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the direc
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 03:15:00PM -0300, Gustavo R. Montesino wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just NMU'd it. Patch is attached.
> >
>
> Yay... thanks for NMUing a pending tagged bug wit
Package: tcltk8.0-ja
Version: 8.0.4jp1.3-15
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is currently using libreadline4 which has been
removed. Please change your build dependency to
libreadline5-dev.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: liquidwar
Version: 5.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your pacakge is failing to build wiht the following error:
Linking liquidwar (target=default, debug=no, static=no, asm=yes)
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXcursor
PS: Could you please make it show the command lines when building
something. I
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please provide more information on the environment where it fail to build.
> * What compiler version?
> * What architecture?
This is current sid, and it breaks on atleast i386 and amd64.
This is with gcc-4.0 4.0.3-1.
For a f
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:52:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 360499 liballegro4.2-dev
> close 360499 2:4.2.0-4
> merge 360499 356861
> thanks
[...]
> Well, liquidwar build-depends on liballegro4.2-dev, so this would be bug
> #356861.
It build now, thanks Steve.
Kurt
--
To UNSUB
h is still present in glib, but is
+deprecated. (Closes: #359336)
+
+ -- Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:24:41 +0200
+
gtk+2.0-directfb (2.0.9.2-14) unstable; urgency=low
* Change to Arch: any. (in particular, to support ppc64 and armeb)
only in patch2:
unchan
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:57:54AM -0500, Geiger Guenter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:34:33PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your bug report.
> Unfortunately I can't reproduce your problem, if you have any hint what
> I could do to fix this
Hi,
With the rebuild of the amd64 port, some things can't be build
yet until wxwindows2.4 or wxwidgets2.6 are in the archive. So I
would like to see those bugs fixed so we can build the rest.
Do you mind if I NMU them?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Hi,
As part of the 0.9.7i upload, I noticed this in the changelog:
* Change the client implementation for SSLv23_method() and
SSLv23_client_method() so that is uses the SSL 3.0/TLS 1.0
Client Hello message format if the SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 option is set.
(Previously, the SSL 2.0 back
om
+Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #350696)
+
+ -- Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 9 Apr 2006 12:24:28 +0200
+
wxwindows2.4 (2.4.4.1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Disable building of the common packages. The 2.6 source package
diff -Nru /tmp/HXeaIGktP0/wx
Package: mono-common
Version: 1.1.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to get removed:
# apt-get remove mono-common
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
mono-common
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0
/wxwidgets2.6-2.6.1.2/debian/changelog 2006-04-09
14:07:13.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+wxwidgets2.6 (2.6.1.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Make it build using the new make. Patch from
+Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #350695)
+
+ -
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4-svn20050920-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
It seems you're build depending on gcc-snapshot. Please don't do
that. It's an experimental version.
According to the changelog:
+ Build-depend on gcc-snapshot on i386 and amd64, because currently only
that version of gcc
Package: libgnomecanvas
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package needs a rebuild because it's .la files still mention
libXrender.la.
It can't be binNMU'd because of this:
Package: libgnomecanvas2-0
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, libgnomecanvas2-common (= ${Source-Version})
And libgnome
Package: libgnomeui-dev
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package ships an .la file which references atleast
libXcursor.la, which has been removed. Since your package is not
binNMU safe, this will need a sourceful upload.
Note that your package is waiting on the following packages to
Package: libgnomeprintui2.2-dev
Version: 2.12.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package ships an .la file which references atleast
libXcursor.la, which has been removed. Since your package is not
binNMU safe, this will need a sourceful upload.
Note that it's waiting on those packages with the same
Package: nas
Version: 1.7-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -o audemo audemo.o -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
../../../lib/audio/libaudio.a -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lm
../../../clients/audio/widgets/libwidgets.a -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Package libopensc1-dev is not available, but is referred to by
another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another so
Package: pyopengl
Version: 2.0.1.09-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it build depends on
xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev but the first of those doesn't
exist, and is the only one that's being tried.
libglu-dev is a virtual package provided by libglu1-mesa-dev, so
yo
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 10:35:07PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> The latest OpenSSL version (0.9.8-6) does not seem to fix the problem with
> Nessus, actually, it makes it work since now the workaround of using a
> restricted set of ciphers no longer works either:
Are you sure
Package: perl-modules
Version: 5.8.8-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
You moved overload.pm to perl-base, which breaks partial
upgrades.
If you have perl-modules 5.8.8-2 with perl 5.8.8-1 things that
use overload.pm will break because it's not available anymore.
Please change the Depends from:
Depends:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:00:17PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> * Frank Lichtenheld wrote on Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 05:19:37PM CET:
> > Package: libtool
> > Version: 1.9+20051221-1
> > Severity: serious
>
> This looks like the test suite failed, but not like the source failed to
>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
It might be. It seems that postfix is using the BIO interface,
so it might be your problem. It never h
reassign 353346 gcj-4.0
retitle 353346 gcj can't make shared libs on hppa.
thanks
Hi,
It seems that gcj can't make proper shared libs on hppa, or is
doing something else strange.
This is tested with gcj-4.0 4.0.2-9
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/libtool-1.9+20051221/tests/testsuite.dir/12/test$ cat
A1.ja
Package: doc++
Version: 3.4.10-3.2+b1
Severity: serious
After the binNMU of doc++, I get the following error:
Preparing to replace doc++ 3.4.10-3.2 (using .../doc++_3.4.10-3.2+b1_amd64.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement doc++ ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/doc++_3.4.10-3.2+b1_amd64
Package: libx11
Version: 2:1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for BIGREQS... yes
checking for XPROTO... yes
checking for X11... configure: error: Package requirements
(xextproto xtrans xau xcmiscproto) were not met:
Package: x11proto-core-dev
Version: 7.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
You have a lot of packages with a Pre-Dependency on x11-common,
but all with the wrong version. It says things like:
Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 0.99)
Or:
Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 1.0)
Which can be satisfied by 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4.
Package: libxext
Version: 1:1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for XEXT... configure: error: Package requirements
(xproto x11 xextproto xau) were not met:
Package inputproto was not found in the pkg-config search p
merge 351779 354165
thanks
Looks like they're the same, and I seem to have picked the same
random one as Frank to report it against.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 354167 libx11-dev 1.0.0-1
thanks
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> This seems to be a missing build dependency on
> x11proto-input-dev.
>
> It also can't find the xdmcp.pc, which looks like a missing build
> dependency on libxdmcp-dev,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as
changelog entry:
* New upstream, fixes
Hi,
Looking at the failed log, I see:
-directory/file1
directory/file2
+directory/file1
The test seems to be depending on the order of files as returned
by something, which isn't ordered. We've saw this problem before
with an other package.
If I do a touch file1; touch file2, "find ." can retu
Package: mailutils
Version: 1:0.6.93-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I../include -I../lib -I.. -I../include
-I../include/mailutils/gnu -I../mailbox -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\"
-DSITE_MAIL_RC=\"/etc/mail.rc\
Package: net-snmp
Version: 5.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package seems to be miscompiled because it's mixing
old (1.4.3) and new (1.5.22) libtool versions. You build
depend on libtool, and run libtoolize, but it warns that
you should update aclocal.m4 manually since it's not auto
generated
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:02:04PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> After some investigation of the failure of kdelibs to build, I found it
> appears to be a bug in either libtool, ld, or the dynamic linker, so I'm
> CC'ing the maintainers of those packages. The problem is that lt-meinproc is
>
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.999-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with a segmentation
fault. From the buildd log:
GCONV_PATH=/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.999/build-tree/amd64-libc/iconvdata LC_ALL=C
LOCPATH=/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.999/build-tree/amd
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 06:20:14PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> It is not allowed to have both positive and negative arch entries in a
> dependency.
Stupid typo, building new version now, will be uploaded shortly.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Package: libx11-6
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems there is a conflict between libx11-6 and xlibs-data:
Unpacking xlibs-data (from .../xlibs-data_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/xlibs-data_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to ove
Package: xfonts-utils
Version: 1:1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for X11... configure: error: Package requirements (x11)
were not met:
No package 'x11' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
inst
Package: xutils
Version: 1:1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for FSLSFONTS... configure: error: Package requirements
(x11 libfs) were not met:
No package 'x11'
The problem is that the build dependency say:
libxmu-dev (>= 1.0.1-1), libx11-dev (>= 1.0.0-1), libxau-dev (>=
1.0.0-1), libxaw7-dev (>= 1.0.1-1)
libxmu-dev doesn't seem to have a source package in experimental
(yet?), but I assume it's having the same problems as all the
others.
The others are a
Package: beagle
Version: 0.2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for X... no
checking X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h usability... yes
checking X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h presence... yes
checking for X11/extensions/scrnsaver.h... yes
checking
Package: libx11
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: serious
Hi,
Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements
(kbproto inputproto) were not met:
No package 'inputproto' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH en
Package: libgphoto2
Version: 2.1.99-5
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_movefiles
dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/libgphoto2/apidocs.html/ not found
(supposed to put it in libgphoto2-2-dev)
dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/s
Package: gphoto2
Version: 2.1.6-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
actions.c:472: error: 'struct _ExifData' has no member named 'ifd0'
actions.c:473: error: 'struct _ExifData' has no member named 'ifd0'
actions.c:474: error: 'struct _ExifData' has n
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: libx11
> > Version: 1:1.0.0-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your package is
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Anyway, the package checks for a "inputproto.pc" file directly.
> > It doesn't check for xextproto.pc (at that point), and libxi-dev
>
Atleast for xtrans-dev 1.0.0-2 this hasn't been fixed yet.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 08:51:52PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Atleast for xtrans-dev 1.0.0-2 this hasn't been fixed yet.
So do the following:
x11proto-core-dev
libxdmcp-dev
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:54:56PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Thanks for the input. Judging from some of the build logs:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=shishi&ver=0.0.26-1&arch=s390&stamp=1150659548&file=log&as=raw
> http://buildd.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > No, it's because you have conflicting build dependencies, and
> > seeing the buildd log is actually the reason I filed the bug in
> > the first place.
>
> Ah, you are right. In that case, it seems that none of the other
> buildd
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:04:42PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
> So how should one fix this situation?
> apt-get dist-upgrade doesn't fix it.
You have various options:
- Run /etc/init.d/ntp-server start, so that stopping it works.
- Edit the /etc/init.d/ntp-server script, and add a --oknodo
Package: dbus
Version: 0.62-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to install. From a buildd log:
Setting up libdbus-1-2 (0.62-2) ...
Setting up dbus (0.62-2) ...
Starting system message bus: dbusFailed to start message bus:
Failed to read directory "/etc/dbus-1/system.d": No such fil
Package: libgtk-java,libgtk-jni
Version: 2.6.2-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that libgtk-java and libgtk-jni depend on each other,
making a circular dependency loop. This will give unpredictible
results since dpkg will decide where to break the loop, and that
might cause problems for other pa
Package: kaptain
Version: 1:0.71-1.4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/kaptain-0.71'
cd . && /build/buildd/kaptain-0.71/admin/missing aclocal-1.4
WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed, and you do not seem to have
Package: xml-security-c
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/usr/bin/make -C canon compile
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/xml-security-c-1.2.1/src/canon'
g++ -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wall -fPIC -DLINUX -c -I../../include -o
../../l
Package: plplot
Version: 5.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I../include -I/usr
/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.6 -I/usr/include/wx-2.6 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_C
ASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FIL
Package: plplot
Version: 5.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -shared .libs/cplplotcanvasmodule_la-cplplotcanvas.o
.libs/cplplotcanvasmodule_la-cplplotcanvasmodule.o
-L/build/buildd/plplot-5.6.1/src/.libs -L/usr/lib/python2.3 -lpython2.3
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 20:01 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 07:04:42PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > So how should one fix this situation?
> > > apt-get dist-upgrade doesn
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:02:34PM -0400, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need to provide a stable upgrade path, at least from the
> > > previous
> > > stable version. Something in the preinst like the stuff we recently
> > > removed
> > > might be the ticket.
> >
> > Afaik, an up
Package: kipi-plugins
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems you have a build dependency on libmagick9++-dev which
doesn't exist. You probably want libmagick++9-dev. (The ++
before the 9 instead of after.)
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Package: adplug
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for pkg-config... no
checking for libbinio_CFLAGS...
checking for libbinio_LIBS...
configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old. Make
sure it
is i
Package: python-gtk2-dev
Version: 2.8.6-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building planner, I get the following error:
/usr/bin/pygtk-codegen-2.0: line 11: /usr/bin/python2.4: No such file or
directory
/usr/bin/pygtk-codegen-2.0: line 11: exec: /usr/bin/python2.4: cannot execute:
No such file or dir
Hi,
I've taking a closer look at why op/pack.t is failing. I
was looking at this at hppa, incase that matters.
Here is a list of the lines having a problem:
not ok 505
# For list (-128, -1, 0, 1, 127) (total -1) packed with c unpack '%53c' gave 0,
expected 9.00719925474099e+15
not ok 615
# For
Hi,
I've been looking at this, and I've been able to remove and build
most of it so far. It just needs some more work in adjusting
configure script and Makefiles and things like that. I removed
the following dirs/files which all seem to be unused, or easely
worked around:
arlib/
ElectricFence/
s
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 04:24:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, did some investigation: removing /etc/services (after having
> installed inetutils-inetd) causes ntpdate to fail, so you're
> correct.
>
> (just fyi: other packages like syslog and most likely fam are also
> affected by th
Package: epic4
Version: 1:2.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that you run configure with the --with-perl option, but
the configure check fails because it can't find libperl.so. It
used to be build with perl support before on i386, but it's not
anymore.
Please add build dependency on perl.
K
found 377073 2.9-2
thanks
Hi,
It seems you didn't add the build dependency, and it's still
failing in the same way.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: squid
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I. -I../../../include -I../.
./../include-m32 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -g -O2
-D_REENTRANT -MT squid_se
Package: mozilla-traybiff
Version: 1.2.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-traybiff-1.2.2'
unzip -d debian/temp/tb/ mozTrayBiff-1.2.2-tb1.5.0.4-Linux_x86_64-gcc3.xpi
make: unzip: Command not found
m
Package: sooperlooper
Version: 1.0.8c-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all 64 bit arches with the
following error:
midi_bind_panel.cpp: In member function 'void SooperLooperGui::MidiBindPanel::r
efresh_state()':
midi_bind_panel.cpp:457: error: cast from 'wxListCtrl*' to
severity 377401 serious
thanks
Missing build dependencies are RC bugs.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sablotron
Version: 1.0.2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to upgrade sablotron from 1.0.2-5 to 1.0.2-5.1 I get
the following error:
Preparing to replace sablotron 1.0.2-5 (using
.../sablotron_1.0.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement sablotron ...
dpkg: error processing /var/c
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:37:58AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 10:10:37AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > > > apache2-prefork-dev depends on libapr0-dev which conflicts with
> > > > libapr1-dev.
> > > But that should be fi
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 08:08:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:55:38AM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > tags 377330 +unreproducible +moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 13:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> >
Package: namazu2
Version: 2.0.16-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
>From the buildd log:
cd tknamazu && /usr/bin/make install prefix=/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0.16/../deb
ian/namazu2/usr
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0.16/tknamazu'
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/namazu2-2.0
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> It seems that the created tar files are good, but during
> extraction it doesn't always react the same.
straces between 2 runs that are good only differ in some system
call, and they all have to do with either the
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:49:51AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the created tar files are good, but during
> > extraction it doesn't always react the same.
The problem se
Package: libdnsres
Version: 0.1a-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building your package, we get the following:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./compat -I/usr/include
-Wall -O0 -g -DRESOLVSORT -c strlcpy.c
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./compat -I/usr/include
Package: libtexttools
Version: 2.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Libtexttools currently can't be build anymore since gnat has been
replaced by gnat-4.1.
Maybe it can also be supported on more arches now?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:45:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: mod-bt
> Version: 0.0.18+p4.1178-2
> Severity: serious
(Previously send to the wrong bug report)
On amd64 (and other 64 bit arches?) we're seeing something simular:
bt_nice_size.c: In function 'bt_nice_size':
bt_nice_size.c
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:30:21PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Kurt,
> Any chance I can get access to a box to play around with? This (and
> other problems) could pop up all over the place in the code, it'd be nice to
> be able to tackle them all at once instead of just uploading a new ve
On amd64 (and other 64 bit arches?) we're seeing something simular:
bt_nice_size.c: In function 'bt_nice_size':
bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned
int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t'
bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long uns
Package: expect
Version: 5.43.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
While trying to upgrade, I get the following errors:
The following packages will be upgraded:
expect expect-dev
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
40 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/553kB of archi
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:23:23AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Thanks Kurt,
> I've been working through your patch and correcting the code in
> dev... If you're willing, I would like to send you my results when I'm done
> to test again.
Sure, just send me the diff or some url or somethin
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:22:25AM +0100, Sam Morris wrote:
> found 325842 1:4.2.0a+stable-9
> thanks
>
> This looks like a bug I reported some time ago. I was never able to
> reproduce it reliably so I closed it, but I have seen it crop up
> occasionally since then.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cg
dency on libperl-dev (Closes: #376946)
+
+ -- Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:29:10 +
+
epic4 (1:2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Rebuilt for the new OpenSSL version.
diff -u epic4-2.2/debian/control epic4-2.2/debian/control
--- epic4-2.2/debian/control
+++ epic4
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:02:42PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Kurt,
> I applied these and zelously went through and made sure everything
> in those files is type-safe. Now the result isn't releaseable on 32-bit
> platforms, it compiles fine, but it's causing segmentation faults after a
>
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:04:54PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, I still get those:
>
> OK Kurt, try this one:
>
> http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/debian/sid/
bt_metainfo.c:120: warning: format '%d' e
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 06:57:25PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>
> Kurt,
> I believe those are addressed in mod-bt_0.0.18+p4.1364, if you'd
> like to have a look:
>
> http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/debian/sid/
That one build without any problems.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
tags 328200 + pending
thanks
I've just commited a 4.2.2+dfsg version to the svn. All the
files mentioned in my previous post have been removed, including
the 2 clocks.
The copyright file still needs some work.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:14:20PM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote:
> Package: cvsnt
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> cvsnt_2.5.03.2382-1 FTBFS on amd64 with the following error:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -g -O2 -o .libs/cvsnt add.o admin.o annotate.o buffer.o
> chacl.o chown.o checkin.o checkout.o
found 341798 2.01-1
thanks
It seems this bug is back. It fails with:
In file included from filetrans.h:14,
from project.h:51,
from views.h:41,
from views.cpp:10:
ghemicalconfig2.h:103:1: warning: "VERSION" redefined
In file included from filetran
found 378432 2.2-2
thanks
Hi,
I think you're still missing some build dependencies.
It now stopped with:
No pages of output.
Transcript written on xml.log.
/usr/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting.
/usr/bin/texi2dvi: see xml.log for errors.
make: *** [docs/xmlada2.pdf] Error 1
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:01:50PM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> >
> >> I'm guessing the real problem is this from configure:
> >> checking for library containing res_query... no
> >>
> >> The configure check needs to #include when checking
> >> for that function. As you can see from the log
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 11:44:25AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> ===
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvs/cvsnt/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.41.2.183
> retrieving revision 1.41.2.184
> diff -u -r1.41.2.183 -r1.41.2.184
> --- config
Package: python-subversion
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
When trying to remove python-subversion I get the following
error:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
python-subversion subversion-tools svn-buildpackage
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to
Package: xfce4-mixer
Version: 4.3.90.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for libxfce4util-1.0 >= 4.3.90.2... found, but 4.3.90.1
*** The required package libxfce4util-1.0 was found on your system,
*** but the installed version (4.3.90.1) i
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:38:34PM +1000, Mark Hannon wrote:
> Package: tar
> Version: 1.15.91-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I have used some simple scripts to make incremental backups with tar for
> many years. I have attempted to restore a couple of backu
301 - 400 of 2617 matches
Mail list logo
