Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1077405 in pysodium reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pysodium/-/commit/7050f37153f39ddec
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:39:30AM -0500, Rob Ristroph wrote:
> Package: mailman
> Version: 2.1.8-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I installed mailman with apt-get. It installed as a dependancy when
> I was installing gforge.
>
> It worked at least well enough
Op di 13 jun 2006 om 10:17:17 +0200 schreef Frank Lichtenheld:
>
> your package failed to build because it tried to use the
> -march=pentiumpro option in a non-i386 build. However, using
> that option on i386 is likely a policy violation, too.
>
> Also, the build should really have stopped after
Op di 13 jun 2006 om 07:47:49 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> Op di 13 jun 2006 om 10:17:17 +0200 schreef Frank Lichtenheld:
> >
> > your package failed to build because it tried to use the
> > -march=pentiumpro option in a non-i386 build. However, using
> > that option
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.13.6-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Hi,
CVE-2006-1173 / VU#146718 applies to sendmail < 8.13.7. Upstream
released a fix in 8.13.7, as well as patches for 8.13.6 and 8.12.11.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Op za 17 dec 2005 om 03:29:04 +0100 schreef maximilian attems:
>
> backports.org has newer semi-official builds.
> take care regarding the udev version while using such backports.
FWIW, thanks to Wessel Dankers, various builds of 2.6 images for sarge
(currently 2.6.13.4, with usable xfs support)
glad to send along any info that can help solve this.
$ ps ax | grep '[q]runner'
Does stuff like:
/usr/bin/python /var/lib/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=SomeThing
show up? (Is qrunner running?)
Has user list real access to
/var/lib/mailman/lists/net-team/digest.mbox: what are permissi
Op di 14 feb 2006 om 10:08:24 +0100 schreef Daniel Schepler:
> Package: caspar
> Version: 20050424-1
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency caspar << 20040531-1
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: error occoured while parsing Conflicts
> dh
Op di 28 feb 2006 om 05:07:14 +0100 schreef Andreas Jochens:
> Package: uruk
> Version: 20051027-1
> Severity: serious
>
> When building 'uruk' in a clean unstable chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> Making all in man
> make[2]: Entering directory `/uruk-20051027/man'
> zoem -d roff -i uruk.
Package: autobook
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG
Hi,
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html , it is
explained why the OPL (Open Publication License) v1 is considered to be
non-DFSG-free. All 3 reasons also apply to the "OPEN PUBLICATION
LICENSE Draft v0.4, 8 June 19
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
>
> Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?
Nobody stoo
Hi,
FWIW: A patch which might fix this problem is available from
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2005-September/046523.html
.
This bug likely is _not_ fixed in mailman 2.1.6.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Steve Langasek, thanks for joining the discussion.]
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:28:47PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:03:25AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> >> caspar-doc inst
Hi,
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > caspar-doc installs files in /usr/share/doc/caspar/ ; it should
> > install them in /usr/share/doc/caspar-doc/
OK, here's my reasoning [feel free to move it to debian-devel]:
If I, as a user, want addit
tags 315781 pending
thanks
Hi,
Reported bug is fixed in an NMU I just uploaded to the 7-day delayed
queue on gluck.
debian/changelog is detailed on what's changed:
in control: s/Depends: libcurl3/Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}/;
in rules: uncomment dh_shlibdeps
.
Kees: if you prepare a new pack
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-10
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi,
[This is gonna be a sloppy bugreport; however, I still feel the problem
needs to be reported.]
In the last couple of days, 2 of my systems suffered major filesystem
corruption. Both
Package: webalizer-stonesteps
Severity: serious
Hi,
I don't consider the webalizer-stonesteps Debian package mature enough
for a stable Debian release. I'm not sure I'll have the time to do the
necessary work for this before the release of lenny.
Users will likely have to spend quite some time
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:27:13PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
>
> FWIW, a Debian package with Daniel Smolik's patch is available from
>
> deb[-src] http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/debian etch amavis-stats
>
> I *might* have time to upload this as an NMU, soonish.
It's upl
tags 441659 + upstream
tags 441659 + pending
thanks
Fixed in upstream VC.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
FWIW, a Debian package with Daniel Smolik's patch is available from
deb[-src] http://non-gnu.uvt.nl/debian etch amavis-stats
I *might* have time to upload this as an NMU, soonish.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 479915 pending
thanks
r5145 | joostvb | 2008-05-18 07:13:21 +0200 (zo, 18 mei 2008) | 5 lines
Changed paths:
M /manuals/trunk/debian-faq/debian/changelog
M /manuals/trunk/debian-faq/debian/control
Add missing Bu
nd/or
> costar.at.panic.et.tudelft.nl?)
Yes, it's "J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Op Sun 24 Aug 2008 om 12:19:46 -0700 schreef Steve Langasek:
> minor contributions:
> Joost van Baal
FWIW, I am happy with any DFSG-free license on my contribution to the
release notes.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've just uploaded debian-faq 4.0.3. It'd be cool if it could get
shipped with lenny: it fixes a FTBFS (thanks to Daniel Schepler and
Frank Lichtenheld), and includes some translation updates.
debian-faq has some by-hand files too, btw.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digi
> +++ debian/control(Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
> Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Uploaders: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: d
Package: eekboek
Version: 1.03.90-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
eekboek's first upload to the Debian archive (which was 1.03.90-2) has
just happened. The Debian package has not received enough testing by
enough users to make it fit for a stable release, imho.
Please don't ship it with lenny.
Thanks,
Hi Martin,
Op Sun 27 Jul 2008 om 05:09:45 -0700 schreef Martin Michlmayr:
> * Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-23 09:50]:
> > eekboek's first upload to the Debian archive (which was 1.03.90-2) has
> > just happened. The Debian package has not received en
Op Tue 6 Jan 2009 om 09:11:04 +0100 schreef Joerg Jaspert:
> Package: freedict-tools
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi
>
> the maintainer address for this package does not exist (good luck
> getting a copy of this bug):
>
> pkg-freed...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> SMTP error from remote mail serve
Op di 14 nov 2006 om 11:02:24 +0100 schreef Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: systraq
> Version: 0.0.20050213-7
> Severity: serious
> Usertags: grid5000
>
> Hi,
>
> During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
> problem with your package:
> Removing systraq ...
> Purging configu
Op wo 15 nov 2006 om 09:43:20 +0100 schreef Joost van Baal:
> Op di 14 nov 2006 om 11:02:24 +0100 schreef Lucas Nussbaum:
> > Package: systraq
> > Version: 0.0.20050213-7
> > Severity: serious
> > Usertags: grid5000
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > During
tag 398538 pending
thanks
Op wo 15 nov 2006 om 12:01:48 +0100 schreef Laurent Fousse:
> * Joost van Baal [Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 09:43:20AM +0100]:
> > Laurent: do you want me to commit that?
>
> Yup.
Commited a fix.
> An NMU is welcome as well (I'm not available debian-w
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:55:56 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> I'm working on it
People are getting nervous. Any idea on an ETA? Would it be useful to
publish your (incomplete) work, so that I could help in an efficient
way? (I haven't found any public version control system for the
automake* D
Op wo 9 aug 2006 om 01:56:07 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:55:56 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I'm working on it
>
> People are getting nervous. Any idea on an ETA? Would it be useful to
> publish your (incomplete) work, so that I could help in
severity 549112 wishlist
thanks
Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Please close the bug again, or at least make it severity wishlist.
I agree with Gerrit's reasoning. Bug now wishlist.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Julien,
Op Tue 21 Dec 2010 om 08:38:52 +0100 schreef Julien Valroff:
> tags 606810 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for systraq (versioned as 0.0.20081217-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
DELAYED/2
Hi Julien,
Op Thu 23 Dec 2010 om 06:35:19 +0100 schreef Julien Valroff:
> Le mardi 21 déc. 2010 à 09:08:45 (+0100), Joost van Baal a écrit :
> > Op Tue 21 Dec 2010 om 08:38:52 +0100 schreef Julien Valroff:
> > >
> > > systraq (versioned as 0.0.20081217-2.1)
> Do y
Hi,
Andres Mejia wrote:
> this package should be orphaned.
Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debian package?
If so, it should indeed get orphaned. Googling revealed:
You should set the package maintainer to Debian QA Group
and submit a bug report against the
Hi,
Op Sat 25 Dec 2010 om 09:38:19 +0200 schreef Avi Rozen:
> On 12/25/2010 08:21 AM, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Andres Mejia wrote:
> >
> >> this package should be orphaned.
> >
> >
> > Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debia
..@{牛在田里,ad1810}.com
diff -u systraq-0.0.20081217/debian/control systraq-0.0.20081217/debian/control
--- systraq-0.0.20081217/debian/control
+++ systraq-0.0.20081217/debian/control
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Laurent Fousse
Uploaders: Joost van Baal
-Build-Depends: debhelper
Op Fri 18 Mar 2011 om 12:15:40 +0100 schreef Cyril Brulebois:
> Source: timblserver
> Version: 1.1-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> your package FTBFS everywhere:
> | libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -g -O2 -g -O2
> -pthread -fopenmp -c ServerB
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 12:09:49PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> I've prepared an NMU for python-django-casclient (versioned as
> 1.2.0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to
> tell me if I should cancel it.
Thanks for your work, much appreciated. Please do go ahead.
Bye,
Joo
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
>
> the package "debian-faq" has been uploaded three months ago and contains
> various important fixes. It's currently stuck in BYHAND.
>
> Is there any chance that we can get this package into buster?
and feb 15 it got a
See
> > #494642 #647489 #747084 etc.
[...]
> Yes, it is quite a lot of work; Thijs managed to keep the package in shape,
> I'm convinced I can do it too. However, I don't think it's wise to offer
> moodle in Debian stable
--
Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi again Tobias,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 09:53:30AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:57:03PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> > Am 17.11.2018 um 09:04 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > > I plan to work on the Debian FAQ at
> > > https://
Hi Moritz,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 08:33:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:13:08PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, this work:
> >
> > > validns (0.8+git20170804-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> [..]
>
Hi Maarten (upstream),
Is there no new upstream release expected? If so, I guess indeed it would be
best to drop it from Debian.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 08:35:15PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> We're going to let this package get autoremoved, it's hardly
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:18:41PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> Am 10.01.2019 um 06:46 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > Saw you've uploaded "byhand: 9.0" on november 17, great! Upload is now
> > displayed at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
t; proycon: uit debian verwijderen bedoel je?
> нед 13 11:30 < proycon> ja
> нед 13 11:37 < joostvb> proycon: o, en uh: je verwacht geen nieuwe
> upstream release?
> нед 13 11:46 < proycon> nope
> нед 13 11:46 < proycon> geen releases, geen gebruikers
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:38:31PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Source: rt-extension-sla
> Version: 1.04-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: obsolete, uninstallable
>
> With the upload of RT 4.4 to unstable, this separate package is
> obsoleted - RT 4.4 includes the SLA functionality out
Hi gregor,
Awesome, thanks a lot! (And no need to delay longer.)
Bye,
Joost
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:54:27PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tags 1035289 + patch
> Control: tags 1035289 + pending
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for merecat (versioned as 2.31+git2
Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:52:21AM + schreef Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی:
> Does it worth trying to package pyenv for Debian? Ain't it against any rules?
See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bugs.debian.org/978149 .
Bye,
Joost
--
Joost van Baal-Ilić http:/
Hi karthek e.a.,
Op Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 10:50:07PM +0530 schreef karthek:
> Sorry for spamming…
> Resending the same message, I just remembered debian.org ignores mails
> from mail@* addresses.
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:24:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > > See "ITP pyenv" @ http://bug
, e.g.)
HTH, Bye,
Joost
--
Joost van Baal-Ilić http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/
Tilburg University
mailto:joostvb.uvt.nl The Netherlands
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Another happy at user here.
Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Hi, I believe my last update fixed the problem can someone double check?
That was at 3.2.5-2, right? Closing this bug: afaik nobody has been able to
reproduce the issue. Therefore better to close and see what happens next.
Please reope
reopen 1024239
thanks
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 02:16:28AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks, after consulting with upstream this s
Hi,
Bo YU: thanks a lot for your recent work on securestring! Do you plan
to upload it, or would you prefer me to handle that? (I have time
to take care of it this week.)
Bye,
Joost
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 06:26:54PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:35 PM Joost van Baal-Ilić
> wrote:
> >
> > Bo YU: thanks a lot for your recent work on securestring! Do you plan
> > to upload it, or would you prefer me to handle that? (I have time
>
Thanks, after consulting with upstream this should be fixed in new upstream
https://github.com/stef/equihash/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.3.tar.gz which has
https://github.com/stef/equihash/commit/0806afadf99837519469449c55dc425763e8eef7
. I'll upload a new package soonishlish.
Bye,
Joost
On Wed,
reopen 1024239
thanks
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libequihash&arch=amd64&ver=1.0.4-1&stamp=1672405470&raw=0
shows build on amd64 still fails.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:51:19PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Fri, 30 Dec 2022 12:49:19 +
> wi
Hi Dirk,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:35:42AM +, dirk.j...@telekom.de wrote:
> Hi guys,
> it seems the bug from insserv now arrived in testing with the tons of
> repeated messages. Any chance for a fix?
> Very often repeated:
> insserv: Script sysstat has overlapping Default-Start and Default-S
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for reporting. I expect to be able to upload a fixed package
within a couple of days.
Greetings from DebConf17,
Joost
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:15:46PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: systraq
> Version: 20160803-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian
See also Bug#843328: O: dimbl .
Chris and Adrian: thanks a lot for your investigations!
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 978907 +pending
thanks
thanks to Ko van der Sloot: fixed upstream in
https://github.com/LanguageMachines/timbl/commit/63740b
Bye,
Joost
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:32:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: debian-faq
> Version: 10.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your p
Package: simplesamlphp
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream, security
On mon nov 4 2019, 11:35 Jaime Pérez wrote @
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/simplesamlphp-announce/2odMqz63z7k/6zQQeM91EwAJ
:
> We have been made aware of a security issue affecting all SimpleSAMLphp
> instances deployed as a s
awesome, thanks a lot!
Bye, Joost
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:12:34PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #867277
>
> I just filed a stretch-pu request to finally fix this issue in stretch,
> too: https://bugs.debian.org/911494
> I'll take care of the upload.
>
>
> Andreas
> dif
Hi,
FWIW, this work:
> validns (0.8+git20170804-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Upstream fix for https://github.com/tobez/validns/issues/66 RSIG(CAA).
>
> -- Casper Gielen Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:52:03 +0200
>
> validns (0.8+git20170801-2) unstable; urgency=medium
Hi Tobias,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:53:43PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
>
> are you still planning to do an upload of debian-faq? Or are any other
> members of the maintaining team planning an upload?
I plan to work on the Debian FAQ at
https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2019/01/nl/Venlo . Ho
Hi Tobias,
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:57:03PM +0100, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> Am 17.11.2018 um 09:04 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> >> I plan to work on the Debian FAQ at
> > https://wiki.debian.org/BSP/2019/01/nl/Venlo . However, IIRC currently the
> > FAQ
> &g
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:46:58PM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> > echo "" > faqdynamic.ent
> > if [ -f debian/changelog ]; then \
> >
Yes, this is indeed buggy. I'll work on it. More details below.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 06:43:03AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:46:58PM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed t
tags 871105 pending
thanks
Could reproduce it, after applying patch by Baptiste Jammet (see #851414)
no longer reproducable. Therefore, closing in upcoming upload.
Thanks!
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:00:18AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Yes, this is indeed buggy. I'll work on i
For the record:
At https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81734#c3 Jakub Jelinek wrote on
2017-08-07 07:37:55 UTC:
>> The C99/C11 inlining semantics in this case is that if it is possible and
>> desirable to inline the function, then it is inlined, but the out-of-line
>> copy of the inlined
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 03:58:59AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> I'm investing some time in working on this issue now.
debdiff attached. _untested_ ! more later.
Bye,
Joost
PS/BTW: This bug did cause https://tracker.debian.org/news/866084: r
53613) [06_gcc_7_Os_inline_functions.dpatch]
+ * Use source format '3.0 (quilt)' [debian/source/format], no longer
+build-depend upon deprecated package dpatch.
+
+ -- Joost van Baal-Ilić Wed, 04 Oct 2017 05:38:11 +0200
+
pinfo (0.6.9-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU
diff -Nru pinfo-0.6.9/debian/cont
Control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream
On 2017-08-07 Bas Zoetekouw commited
https://github.com/baszoetekouw/pinfo/commit/c38522340979c92b7e9ed3fbfbd156dba5344f75
:
>> * src/filehandling_functions.c, src/initializelinks.c, src/utils.c:
>> Get rid of inlined functions, which break buildling with gcc7
>
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for this detailed report. FWIW, upstream has been made aware and
acknowledged the problem.
Bye,
Joost
Hi Chris e.a.,
Thanks for this report, I expect to be able to fix it this month.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Gui-Yue,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:04:28AM +0800, Yue Gui wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
> I'll test that again.By the way, I noticed that this package has upgraded
> to 0.3.2-2,however the modifications i suggested seem not applied.Could you
> give me more information about this upgrade?
I only s
Hi stef,
I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a
pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not published on
https://github.com/stef/pysodium/releases either.) (You did sign your pysodium
releases in the past, didn't you?) Could you please pgp sign your release,
and upload t
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > Hi stef,
> >
> > I just found out https://pypi.org/project/pysodium/#files lacks a
> > pysodium-0.7.18.tar.gz.asc . (It's not publishe
Hi again stef,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:06:44PM +0200, stef wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:08:13AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > >
> > > I just found out https://pypi.org/proj
Hi,
FYI: The mclucas package ( program to perform Lucas-Lehmer test on a Mersenne
number) will likely get removed from Debian sid soonish (and won't be released
with upcoming trixie) unless someone spends some time on it soonish.
See https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mlucas and
https://bugs.debian.o
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:56:40AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> there was a series of testing removals due to bug #1071355 of
> r-cran-maptools. Since maptools was removed from CRAN[1] we intend to
> remove this package. However, before doing so I would like to
> understand why p
Hi,
FYI: pwdsphinx 1.0.19-1 just migrated to testing. This should partly fix
#1068975 "src:python-zxcvbn: Abandoned upstream and unmaintained": pwdsphinx no
longer has a hard zxcvbn dependency.
HTH, Bye,
Joost
Hi,
I've had a look at the diff, lgtm. I'd appreciate the upload to unstable in
due time. Thanks a lot for your work, much appreciated!
Bye,
Joost
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:57:49PM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Source: liboprf
> Version: 0.1+git20231001.0da3e2b-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags
Hi Maarten e.a.,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> On Tue Jan 30, 2024 at 2:31 PM CET, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> > As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
> > architectures in 2038 and beyond
> > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bi
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
>
> On second thought, I read https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time and
> checked the updated Frog sources, there is no time_t exposed at all anymore
> in the new version I'm packaging.
That's nice.
> So if I unde
Hi,
[sorry for yet another one, i clicked sent too early...]
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> >
> > On second thought, I read https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bi
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:33:03PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 15:25:44 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> >> Too many changes? Which ones? Compared to my last upload, there aren't
> >> really.
> >
> > Compared to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable.
This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists
of just the file /us
Thanks, I'll get to it soonish.
Bye,
Joost
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: aephea
> Version: 10.008-1
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
>
> Architecture: amd64
> Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upg
(10.008-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: add missing Breaks+Replaces: zoem-doc, to enable upgrades
+from squeeze to wheezy. Thanks Andreas Beckmann. (Closes: #694365)
+
+ -- Joost van Baal-Ilić Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:13:51 +0100
+
aephea (10.008-1) unstable
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:55:25PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>
> Please unblock package aephea
> This upload fixes RC bug #694365 (file conflict between two packages).
unblock aephea/10.008-2
I just uploaded it to ftp.upload.debian.org:/pub/UploadQueue/ .
Bye,
Joost
&
Joost
--
Joost van Baal-Ilić http://abramowitz.uvt.nl/
Tilburg University
mailto:joostvb.uvt.nl The Netherlands
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks, I'll investigate. About a week ago a new moodle upsteam was shipped;
likely that one deals with (some of) these CVE's. I plan to upload within
about a week.
Bye,
Joost
Op Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:59:03AM +0200 schreef Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Source: moodle
> Version: 2.7.7+dfsg-1
> Seve
Hi,
I don't think removal of moodle right now is a sane thing. I'll upload
a final 2.7.2 package to unstable within about 5 weeks.
There has been a private discussion between me, Thijs Kinkhorst and Moritz
Mühlenhoff about this.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think removal of moodle right now is a sane thing. I'll upload
> a final 2.7.2 package to unstable within about 5 weeks.
>
> There has been a private discussion between me
unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Debian Science Team
>
> Changed-By: Joost van Baal-Ilić
> Description:
> libmbt1- memory-based tagger-generator and tagger - runtime
> libmbt1-dev - memory-based tagger-generator and tagger - development
> mbt- memory-bas
package: postfix
version: 2.9.6-2
tag: upstream
severity: critical
Hi,
The Postfix Debian package ships with a default list of supported TLS protocols
which makes it vulnerable to the POODLE TLS attack:
% postconf smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols
smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2
This is the
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this. Likely, some of the issues have been fixed
in moodle_2.7.5+dfsg-1 which just got ACCEPTED in unstable.
I'll investigate the details one of these days.
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
