Bug#900152: nsca-ng: FTBFS against openssl 1.1.1

2018-08-23 Thread Holger Weiß
* Sebastiaan Couwenberg [2018-08-23 07:13]: > Are you aware of this issue in NSCA-ng? No. > I did not find a link to a bugtracker on nsca-ng.org, so I'm forwarding > this by email. I've now enabled the issue tracker on GitHub; if you believe this to be an upstream bug, feel free to report it th

Bug#900152: nsca-ng: FTBFS against openssl 1.1.1

2019-03-19 Thread Holger Weiß
Just for the record: * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [2018-11-05 00:28]: > It is a TLS1.3 issue. If I limit max protocol to TLS1.2 then the > testsuite passes. Yes, it's an OpenSSL bug. If TLSv1.3 is used, SSL_get_psk_identity()¹ unexpectedly returns NULL. I now avoid the function to work around t

Bug#900152: nsca-ng: FTBFS against openssl 1.1.1

2019-03-19 Thread Holger Weiß
* Kurt Roeckx [2019-03-19 22:59]: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Holger Weiß wrote: > > Yes, it's an OpenSSL bug. If TLSv1.3 is used, SSL_get_psk_identity()¹ > > unexpectedly returns NULL. I now avoid the function to work around the > > issue. > >

Bug#900152: nsca-ng: FTBFS against openssl 1.1.1

2019-03-20 Thread Holger Weiß
* Kurt Roeckx [2019-03-20 07:31]: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:21:19PM +0100, Holger Weiß wrote: > > * Kurt Roeckx [2019-03-19 22:59]: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:28:06PM +0100, Holger Weiß wrote: > > > > Yes, it's an OpenSSL bug. If TL

Bug#1013644: erlang-p1-tls: FTBFS: test failed

2022-07-20 Thread Holger Weiß
This might be caused by a missing "certs" directory in the OpenSSL configuration directory as pointed out here: https://github.com/processone/fast_tls/issues/59#issuecomment-1190378832

Bug#1071182: dracut: requires changes for systemd 256; boot fails otherwise

2024-05-30 Thread Holger Weiß
Source: dracut Version: 060+5-8 Followup-For: Bug #1071182 Tags: patch The following patch addresses the case where /usr and possibly /etc are mounted read-only in the initrd, and therefore fixes the error messsages mentioned in my previous email. From: Holger Weiss Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 21

Bug#1071182: dracut: requires changes for systemd 256; boot fails otherwise

2024-05-31 Thread Holger Weiß
Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 patch Just to clarify, the original report mentiones two changes required for systemd 256: | 1. systemd 256 makes /usr read-only in initrd: |- https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32511 |- https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/issues/253 | | 2

Bug#757858: ejabberd: Upgrade from 2.1.x to 14.05 causes inconsistent conf of Mnesia db in /etc/default/ejabberd

2014-08-19 Thread Holger Weiß
* Philipp Huebner [2014-08-19 10:41]: > Could you please clarify whether this is internal behaviour of ejabberd > or related to handling the configuration files? > > For example, was EJABBERD_NODE previously set (manually / automatically) > in /etc/default/ejabberd or not? The wheezy package set

Bug#1085140: ejabberd downgrade and upgrade again

2025-04-05 Thread Holger Weiß
* Alex [2024-11-01 13:29]: 10) systemd eventually times out the start of ejabberd According to your logs, the actual ejabberd process was started just fine. However, the systemd unit then calls `ejabberdctl started` in order to block until startup is completed, and _that_ process hangs. `

Bug#1085140: ejabberd does not listen on any port after update to 24.07

2025-03-28 Thread Holger Weiß
* Soren Stoutner [2025-03-26 16:56]: I’m raising the severity of this bug as it makes the package completely unusable. Installing and running ejabberd 24.12-2 on a fresh trixie system works just fine for me. So maybe the "grave" severity isn't required here, as that's meant for bugs that re

Bug#1085140: ejabberd does not listen on any port after update to 24.07

2025-03-30 Thread Holger Weiß
* Soren Stoutner [2025-03-28 09:37]: Has anyone successfully tested an upgrade from 23.10-1? That broke for me. We could try to track down the details if you like. I'd start with: 1. Set `loglevel: debug` in `/etc/ejabberd.yml`. 2. systemctl stop ejabberd 3. ejabberdctl foreground What's t