Bug#1033517: yt-dlp: mpv fails to work with yt-dlp, after yt-dlp upgrade (uncoordinated API change?)

Package: yt-dlp Version: 2023.03.04-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello and thanks for maintaining this useful package! After upgrading from yt-dlp/2023.02.17-1 to yt-dlp/2023.03.04-1, mpv is no longer able to use yt-dlp to play YouTube videos: $ mpv https://www.yo

Bug#1029570: sc-im: debian/copyright file seems to be inaccurate

Package: sc-im Version: 0.8.3+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 Hello! Thanks for packaging this interesting program. I noticed that the [debian/copyright] file seems to be inaccurate with respect to the [upstream license]. The [debian/copyright] file states: [...] Files: *

Bug#984469: guitarix: debian/copyright is inaccurate

Package: guitarix Version: 0.42.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 12.5 Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers, I noticed that the [debian/copyright] file for guitarix states that two images ('data/Layout.svg' and 'data/stereo.svg') are under CC-BY-1.0, which does not meet t

Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

Package: systray-mdstat Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I've just given the new version from unstable a try. It seems to completely fail to start: $ systray-mdstat & [1] 64881 $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedes

Bug#846626: fbpanel: debian/copyright reports incorrect licenses (including mine)!

://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/f/fbpanel/copyright-7.0-2 The debian/copyright file of fbpanel/7.0-2 states: Files: debian/terminal_color.svg debian/terminal_sketch.svg Copyright: 2011-2012 Francesco Poli License: GPL-2 which is correct (well, almost: I rediscovered that the actual

Bug#848285: jackd2: spits verbose output and exits immediately when the client stops sending audio

Package: jackd2 Version: 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello and thanks for maintaining jackd2! After the upgrade [UPGRADE] jackd2:amd64 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-3 -> 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-4 [UPGRADE] jackd2-firewi

Bug#840691: libgs9: security update DSA-3691-1 breaks zathura, evince, ... in jessie

Package: libgs9 Version: 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I had a bad surprise today in jessie. After the security update: [UPGRADE] libgs9:amd64 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u1 -> 9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u3 [UPGRADE] libgs9-common:amd64 9.06~dfsg-2

Bug#993172: gcc-11-base: i386 (Geode LX): latest testing migration produces sig ILL (due to #993162 ?)

Package: gcc-11-base Version: 11.2.0-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! During today's upgrade, apt-listbugs[^NOTE] warned me that upgrading libc6 (2.31-13 -> 2.31-17) would produce sig ILL on Geode LX i386 CPUs. See bug [#993162]. Since I have a Geode LX based box

Bug#994969: jackd2: segfaults after today's upgrade of other Debian testing packages

Package: jackd2 Version: 1.9.19~dfsg-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! After today's upgrade, jackd stopped working on my Debian testing box. $ jackd --realtime -d alsa --device hw:PCH --softmode --hwmeter --rate 44100 & jackdmp 1.9.19 Copyright 2001-2005 Paul

Bug#942203: postbooks: fails to comply with the DFSG

Package: postbooks Version: 4.11.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Dear xTuple Maintainers, I noticed that this package is in Debian main and is [released] under the terms of the Common Public Attribution License (CPAL). [released]:

Bug#944693: mailavenger: license incompatibility between 4-clause BSD and GPL

Package: mailavenger Version: 0.8.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello, I [noticed] that package mailavenger includes some files which are derived from code originally released under the terms of the 4-clause BSD license, but their modifications are released under the terms of t

Bug#945118: asymptote: FTBFS because of grffile

Package: asymptote Version: 2.60-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hello! The fix for bug [#944916] seems to be somehow incomplete and prevents the package from [building]. [#944916]: [b

Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

Package: paraview Version: 5.4.1+dfsg4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello paraview Debian package maintainers, thanks for uploading a Debian revision that uses Qt5 rather than Qt4! I've just upgraded to it on my Debian testing box, but I found a bad regression that re

Bug#893561: libtablelayout-java: license does not seem to meet the DFSG

Package: libtablelayout-java Version: 20090826-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello! Thanks for maintaining this package in Debian. I noticed that the license was [discussed](https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/06/msg00050.html) on debian-legal a long time ago. My [opinion

Bug#898075: jack: segfaults at start

Package: jack Version: 3.1.1+cvs20050801-29.2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I have just found out that jack stopped working in Debian testing. Last time I used it (around last December, on an up-to-date Debian testing box), it worked without any glitch. Now, w

Bug#951338: libkeyutils1: rkhunter warns that libkeyutils.so.1.9 may contain a possible rootkit

Package: libkeyutils1 Version: 1.6.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hello! After upgrading [UPGRADE] libkeyutils1:amd64 1.6-6 -> 1.6.1-2 I get the following warning with # rkhunter --sk -c in /var/log/rkhunter.log: Info: Starting test name 'running_

Bug#961684: lintian: exits with error: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference

Package: lintian Version: 2.77.0 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, while attempting to check a just built package within my sid pbuilder-managed chroot enviroment, I see that lintian is no longer working. Please note that lintian/2.76.0 was working fine in the same env

Bug#1052376: lxpanel: no longer obeys its geometry settings

Package: lxpanel Version: 0.10.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I have just upgraded lxpanel: [UPGRADE] lxpanel:amd64 0.10.1-2 -> 0.10.1-4 [UPGRADE] lxpanel-data:amd64 0.10.1-2 -> 0.10.1-4 and not it behaves insanely. My settings are as follows: in the "Ge

Bug#1070343: openfortivpn: stopped working after today's upgrade in Debian testing

Package: openfortivpn Version: 1.22.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org Hello! Thanks a lot for maintaining this useful package in Debian. I use it often to connect to a Fortinet VPN. Unfortunately, after today's (many) upgrades in D

Bug#529362: linuxfacile: includes non-removable, non-modifiable text

Package: linuxfacile Version: 5.0.new-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc gfdl Hi! This package is licensed under the | terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any | later version published by the Free So

Bug#536147: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-0029 fixed in testing, but not unstable

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.30-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hello Debian kernel team! According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-0029 is fixed in testing, but not in unstable. It's fixed in testing because it was fixed in a stable (lenny) point relea

Bug#536148: linux-2.6: [regression] CVE-2009-1758 fixed in testing, but not in unstable

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.30-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hello again Debian kernel team! According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-1758 is fixed in testing, but not in unstable. It's fixed in testing because it was fixed in a stable (lenny) point

Bug#572288: audacious-plugins: after upgrade, audacious stopped working

Package: audacious-plugins Version: 2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! After upgrading audacious-plugins and audacious-plugins-extra from version 2.1-1 to version 2.1-1.1, audacious is totally unable to play anything (Internet streams, local files, ...). When I pre

Bug#607458: desktop-base: debian/copyright file is outdated

Package: desktop-base Version: 6.0.4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 Hi desktop-base maintainers! First of all, thank you very much for fixing bug #587668. However, the changes needed to fix that bug do not seem to be properly documented in the debian/copyright file, unfortunately.

Bug#583956: grace: fails to start after gsfonts upgrade

Package: grace Version: 1:5.1.22-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! Thanks for maintaining this very useful package! After the following upgrade: [UPGRADE] gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4 -> 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.1 xmgrace stopped working: $ xmgrace -

Bug#583964: gsfonts: breaks grace

Package: gsfonts Version: 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Upgrading gsfonts to version 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4.1 breaks grace, as detailed in bug #583956: http://bugs.debian.org/583956 If the issue is in the gsfonts package, please fix it.

Bug#697554: kdeartwork: debian/copyright file seems to be outdated and/or incomplete

Source: kdeartwork Version: 4:4.8.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello and thanks for maintaining this package! It seems to me that the debian/copyright file is outdated and/or incomplete. For instance: (A) the debian/copyright file talks about "Files under kworldclock/", but

Bug#698527: elmer: executable ElmerGUI.real links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: elmer Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello, this may sound like a revival of bug #618696 [1], but in fact it's distinct (although the evergreen OpenCASCADE GPL-incompatibility is still involved...). [1] http://bugs.debian.org/618696 Let's sta

Bug#597237: live-manual: includes non-free files

Package: live-manual Version: 1:2.0~a4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hi! According to http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/live-manual/live-manual_2.0~a4-1/live-manual.copyright the live-manual package seems to include two non-free files. The first troublesome fil

Bug#677421: mayavi2: segfaults as soon as a module is loaded

Package: mayavi2 Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, it seems that I am unable to use mayavi2 on an updated Debian testing box. I reproduced this bug with any data set I tried to visualize, hence the package is currently unusable. Steps to reproduce:

Bug#678746: desktop-base: Joy theme is a mix of incompatibly-licensed works

Package: desktop-base Version: 7.0.0~exp2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello, I read about the new Joy theme [1][2]. [1] http://blog.pault.ag/post/25614704596/my-quest-to-get-desktop-base-set-before-wheezy [2] http://blog.pault.ag/post/25747178764/debian-desktop-7-0-0-exp2-in-exp

Bug#689919: subversion: includes a non-free file

Package: subversion Version: 1.7.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello, while reviewing subversion/1.7.5-1 debian/copyright file, I noticed that debian/contrib/svn_load_dirs is licensed under the AFL v3.0 . This license includes non-free restrictions and is also problematic with

Bug#692071: storymaps: includes non-free files (src/org/json/*)

Package: storymaps Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello Javier, it seems to me [1] that storymaps includes non-free files (src/org/json/*) released under the JSON license [2]. [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/storymaps/current/copyright [2] http

Bug#694270: figlet: includes non-free files copyrighted by Unicode Inc.

Package: figlet Version: 2.2.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello, while reviewing the debian/copyright file of the (finally back in main!) figlet package, I noticed two issues. The first is an inaccurate copying of a license text: | Files: tests/emboss.tlf | Copyright: 2006

Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception

Package: ntop Version: 3:4.99.3+ndpi5517+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello, I noticed that ntop is mainly licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later, with only one file (ssl.c) having an OpenSSL linking exception. However, ntop seems to link with libssl (which is

Bug#695424: ntop: protocols.c seems to be incompatibly licensed

Package: ntop Version: 3:4.99.3+ndpi5517+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 Hello, the debian/copyright file for the ntop Debian package states: [...] | Files: protocols.c | Copyright: 2003-2010, Luca Deri |1994-1996, The Regents of the University of California | Lic

Bug#684091: id-utils: info documentation is non-free

Package: id-utils Version: 4.5-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc gfdl Hello, according to bug #644131 [1], the info documentation shipped with this package (/usr/share/info/idutils.info.gz and id-utils-4.5/doc/idutils.info)

Bug#617613: freecad: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: freecad Version: 0.10.3247.dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for maintaining freecad. This package is mainly released under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2 or later, but includes some files released under the terms of the GNU GPL

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

Package: gmsh Version: 2.5.0.dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello again Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for maintaining gmsh, as well. This package is released under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 and links with libgsl0ldbl, which is released under the terms of the GNU GPL v

Bug#618696: elmer: multiple licensing issues

Package: elmer Version: 5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello again Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for maintaining elmer in Debian. This package is released under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later, but it also incorporates file elmergrid/acx_metis.m4, w

Bug#618968: netgen: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: netgen Version: 4.9.12.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello again Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for maintaining netgen in Debian! This package is released under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2 or later. However, it links with various ffmpeg libraries, which are u

Bug#619662: salome: multiple licensing issues

Package: salome Version: 5.1.3-12 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello again Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for maintaining salome in Debian. This package is released under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2.1, but includes files released under the GNU GPL v2 or later, and links wit

Bug#614497: doc-debian: The OPL-licensed documents taken from Debian website are non-free

Package: doc-debian Version: 3.1.2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hi! As you already know, the documents taken from the official Debian website are not really copyrighted by SPI: http://bugs.debian.org/388141 Moreover, those documents are licensed under the terms of the Open Publi

Bug#776191: vim-common: xxd license is not documented in debian/copyright file

Package: vim-common Version: 2:7.4.488-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 Hello and thanks for maintaining my favorite text editor in Debian! It has been recently noticed that package vim-common includes the xxd command which used to be licensed in a non-free manner and is not document

Bug#772417: desktop-base: debian/copyright file needs to be updated

Package: desktop-base Version: 8.0.0~exp1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 4.5 Hello, I revised the debian/copyright file currently present on the repository: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-desktop/packages/trunk/desktop-base/debian/copyright?revision=336&view=markup

Bug#783553: numdiff: debian/copyright file is not complete

Package: numdiff Version: 5.8.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.5 Hello and thanks for maintaining this interesting package in Debian! After taking a look at bug #709492, I noticed that the debian/copyright file for numdiff/5.8.1-1 [1] seems to be incomplete, as it does not mention th

Bug#784565: nx-libs-lite: parts are derived from non-free code

Package: nx-libs-lite Version: 3.5.0.27-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello and thanks for maintaining this package in Debian! I noticed that the debian/copyright states: [...] | Parts of this software are derived from DXPC project. These copyright | notices apply to original D

Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free

Package: gpick Version: 0.2.5-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello and thanks for maintaining this little tool in Debian! I noticed that the license for file share/gpick/colors.txt fails to meet the DFSG, as it includes at least one non-free restriction. Clause 5 states: | 5.

Bug#824068: sympytexpackage: documentation is non-free

Package: texlive-math-extra Version: 2015.20160320-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello and thanks for maintaining TeX Live in Debian! I noticed that binary package texlive-math-extra includes, among other LaTeX packages, sympytexpackage. This is very useful, thanks for including

Bug#823100: ghostscript: includes two files claimed to be under a non-free Unicode license

Package: ghostscript Version: 9.19~dfsg-1+b1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello, I noticed that two files included in the ghostscript source package are documented in the debian/copyright file as distributed under the terms of a non-free Unicode license. The two files are: Fil

Bug#679437: brewtarget: includes non-free images

Package: brewtarget Version: 1.2.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello, according to its debian/copyright file [1], this package includes some images licensed under the terms of CC-by-nc-nd-v3.0: | Files: images/flag*.png | Copyright: 2009-2010, A68 Freelance Graphics Designs |

Bug#680738: salome-gui: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: salome-gui Version: 6.5.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello Debian Science Maintainers, thanks for your effort to reintroduce SALOME into Debian. However, it seems to me that one of the licensing issues that affected the previous package [1] is still present in the cu

Bug#722134: pandoc: includes unmodifiable documents

Package: pandoc Version: 1.9.4.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 User: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org Usertags: nonfree-doc unmodifiable Hello! Thanks for maintaining pandoc in Debian. By looking at its debian/copyright file: http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs//main

Bug#708693: audacious: needs stricter versioned dependency on audacious-plugins (fails to start)

Package: audacious Version: 3.3.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I've just upgraded a Debian testing (jessie) box with audacious and audacious-plugins installed. Since audacious-plugins has not yet migrated into testing, while audacious did, only audacious was upg

Bug#728444: libfontconfig1: xpdf is broken by fontconfig version 2.11.0-1

Package: libfontconfig1 Version: 2.11.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders xpdf package unusable Control: block -1 by 727070 Hello, there's a bug in xpdf [#727070] which is triggered by the upgrade of fontconfig to version 2.11.0-1 (from, say, version 2.10.2-2). [#727070] http://bugs.debian

Bug#725644: apt-listbugs: should not migrate into testing until the .utf8 issue is solved

Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.10 Severity: serious Justification: affected by a bug in another package, should wait for the fix Control: block -1 by 725496 Version 0.1.10 of apt-listbugs should not migrate into testing. At least, not until a fixed ruby-gettext has migrated. See bug #725496 fo

Bug#811106: browser-plugin-gnash: crashes with general protection error and fails to work

Package: browser-plugin-gnash Version: 0.8.11~git20160109-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I experienced a grave regression after upgrading browser-plugin-gnash: [UPGRADE] browser-plugin-gnash:amd64 0.8.11~git20150419-3+b3 -> 0.8.11~git20160109-1 [UPGRADE] gn

Bug#815600: isympy: lacks a dependency on python-sympy | python3-sympy

Package: isympy Version: 0.7.6.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello and thanks for maintaining the sympy Debian package! I think binary isympy lacks a dependency on python-sympy | python3-sympy. Without this dependency, installing it leaves the package in an unusable

Bug#807074: fbreader: includes files with unclear DFSG-freeness and/or copyright status

Package: fbreader Version: 0.10.7dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Hello Eugene and thanks for maintaining FBReader in Debian! I noticed something awkward in the debian/copyright file: [...] | Html entity files (fbreader/data/formats/docbook/*.ent) with | these licenses: |

Bug#737782: ruby-switch: fails to work with ruby/1:1.9.3.1

Package: ruby-switch Version: 0.1.0 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, after installing ruby/1:1.9.3.1, the alternatives for /usr/bin/ruby and similar links seem to have been replaced by direct links. $ ls -altrF /usr/bin/ruby lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 3 01:08

Bug#740463: libelmersolver-6.1.so links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libelmersolver-6.1 Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, it was previously [1] noticed that Elmer links with SCOTCH, which is GPL-incompatible. [1] https:

Bug#730835: bugs.debian.org: the BTS seems to no longer know who are the maintainers of the packages!

Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hello! The BTS seems to have forgotten the names and e-mail addresses of the maintainers of all packages! Or, at least, of a part of the packages... For instance: http://bugs.debian.org/730490 states "Maintaine

Bug#741112: libfreefoam1: libscotchDecomp.so.0.1.0 is GPL-licensed but links with GPL-incompatible library

Package: libfreefoam1 Version: 0.1.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/freefoam/libscotchDecomp.so.0.1.0 is apparently licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL v3 o

Bug#741165: libdolfin1.3: libdolfin.so.1.3.0 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libdolfin1.3 Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdolfin.so.1.3.0 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the

Bug#741172: libslepc3.4.2: libslepc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libslepc3.4.2 Version: 3.4.2.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libslepc.so.3.4.2 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or la

Bug#741196: libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libpetsc3.4.2 Version: 3.4.2.dfsg1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or l

Bug#741204: getdp is GPL-licensed, but links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: getdp Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the program /usr/bin/getdp is under the GNU GPL v2 (only? or later? the debian/copyright is not too clear on this aspect) and

Bug#741303: libfeel++1: libfeelpp.so.1.0.0 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libfeel++1 Version: 1:0.95.0-final-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libfeelpp.so.1.0.0 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or

Bug#754310: netgen: meshing a STEP file makes X crash

Package: netgen Version: 4.9.13.dfsg-8+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I cannot generate a mesh on a geometry described in a STEP file without experiencing X crashes that force me to reboot the machine. I can reproduce the issue as follows: • take a STEP file,

Bug#1085300: opensm: fails to start after Linux kernel upgrade to 6.11.2

Package: opensm Version: 3.3.23-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org Hello, thanks for maintaining this package. I encountered a major issue, as soon as I upgraded the Linux kernel of the box where OpenSM runs (in order to manage the In

Bug#1090984: opensm: fails to build for arch:all

Package: opensm Version: 3.3.23-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org Dear Debian HPC Team, I am worried by the long absence of package 'opensm' from Debian testing. The latest u

Bug#1093734: nfs-kernel-server: fails to complete setup during upgrade (stuck while restarting nfs-kernel-server.service)

Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1:2.8.2-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org Dear maintainers, I encountered a big issue, while upgrading package 'nfs-kernel-server' on the box where the NFS server runs (the clients run on th

<    1   2   3   4   5   6