Bug#1037804: Fixed upstream

2023-07-18 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream This bug has been fixed upstream. Since a new version is released soon, I'll wait for that. That fix will be included when it is packaged. Thanks, Bas

Bug#834472: vmmlib: Patch for address #834472 , #897845

2018-11-01 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
Hi, Thanks for the help! I don't have time to test it now, but the patch looks good. Feel free to NMU without delay. Thanks, Bas On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:24:29AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > Hi all, > > I'll also do NMU in 10 days if nobody denies it. > > debdiff as attachment >

Bug#894770: alternative workaround

2018-05-02 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
Control: severity -1 important On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:34:02AM +0100, b...@hotsite.to wrote: > Just install the package arduino-mk Arduino-mk depends on arduino-core, which is provided by src:arduino. Due to the severity of this bug, all of that is about to be removed from testing. The justif

Bug#1056780: openmsx: Source-less Windows binary in source package (and other packaging issues)

2023-11-26 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
Hi, First of all, thank you for the report and patch. I'll look in more detail shortly. However, after quickly looking over it, I have one question: you change the license from "GPL (any version)" to "GPL (version 2)". Why did you do that? The upstream license information is admittedly not very

Bug#1056780: openmsx: Source-less Windows binary in source package (and other packaging issues)

2023-11-29 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
Hi, Thanks a lot for not just finding those issues, but also fixing them! That is much appreciated. As for the license, Manuel (who is upstream) pointed out that the entire source code is (and always has been) GPL-2 only. The only issue with that is the packaging, which is GPL-3+. But that was my

Bug#1056780: openmsx: Source-less Windows binary in source package (and other packaging issues)

2023-12-03 Thread Dr. Bas Wijnen
Hi, This is starting to look great, thanks a lot of all the work. :-) However, I still see a few issues with it: - the references to C-BIOS in the XML configuration files should not be removed. When running, they are usually availably from the cbios package. And if the user didn't install th