close 364242 2:1.7.8-1sarge6
thanks
your are right. We missed to close this bug. At least its fixed in
stable-security.
For unstable I don't know.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages pr
;
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:57 +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > your are right. We missed to close this bug. At least its fixed in
> > stable-security.
> > For unstable I don't know.
> It's not yet fixed for Etch/Sid. For two months!
> I d
severity 374382 grave
severity 374400 grave
merge 374382 374400
tags 374400 + confirmed
tags 374400 + pending
tags 374382 + confirmed
tags 374400 + pending
thanks
yes, its time to template this, so I won't forget to bump version in install.rdf
in future. Anyway, Fix is pending!!
- Alexander
p.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Ryan Richter wrote:
> Would someone please kindly fix this? It's been almost 6 months now,
> and I'm getting rather sick of recompiling mozilla myself.
>
> AMD64 gets no respect...
>
Loic, you a time-slot NMU this? I am currently under 120% load, so I p
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:10:25PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:19:15PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0100, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:45:37PM -
Please test the testbuild that fixes those issues here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/2006-April/000266.html
Especially, look out for regressions in mozilla dependants.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
repl
severity 364680 important
thanks
yes, a security issue but not a blocker IMO. Anyway, I will do some
research on this. I don't remember exactly why mozilla decided not to
switch this of by default in 1.5.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
reply
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:53:55PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi there--
>
> This bug (and its merged fellow) appears to be the only thing keeping
> Thunderbird 1.5 out of etch. It has now been tagged pending since 19
> March, which is well over a month ago. Can we expect a version with
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 05:36:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> When starting Thunderbird, I get the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla-thunderbird
> selected locale: en-US
> DOUBLE-CLICK: 250 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 --> -1 The program
> 'mozilla-thunderbird-bin' received a
tags 357623 + pending
thanks
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:15:48AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> tags 321644 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder why Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> set this bug to unreproducible,
> we have no woreking mozilla since August in the amd64 port, and 1.7.12-1
> is still affected.
>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:07:02PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 1.8 branch, meaning next mozilla and thunderbird upstream releases will
> also benefit from the fix. I will file this arm fix upstream.
Great, but don't forget to ask for review.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is li
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:41:02PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> merge 329664 329667
> thanks
>
> On 05/09/22 17:27 +0200, Florian Weimer said ...
> > Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> > Version: 1.0.6-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> >
> > The --compose option executes shell comma
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
> > * Alexander Sack:
> >
> >> Attached a start script that should fix this issue ...
> >
> >> echo moreargs $moreargs
> >
> > This seems to be some debugging cruft. Have you sent the correct
> > version?
>
> U
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> - # Protect quotes and $ in command-line arguments from two shell evals
> - moreargs="$moreargs \"$(echo "$1" | sed -e 's/"/\\\"/g' \
> - -e 's/[$]/\\\$/g')\""
> + [EMAI
tags 329664 + pending
tags 329667 + pending
tags 325536 + pending
tags 292475 + pending
thanks
I will wait one or two more days, because mozilla is about to release
1.0.7 which addresses several security issues.
Setting pending, because the 1.0.6 package is ready here.
- Alexander
p.s. please
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> this potential license problem is blocking (among others) the transition
> of 1.0.7-1, which fixes several serious security problems. As the problems
> some debian-legal people seem to have spotted haven't been noticed by n
tags 330295 + etch-ignore
thanks
not all files have been relicensed to gpl. MPL is non-free,
nevertheless keep.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:07:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Is this bug about the fact that the MPL isn't free, or about the fact that
> the copyright file doesn't mention the
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:04:15PM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Thunderbird segfaults after reading some (2) new RSS items. Im
> displaying the url not reading the RSS text.
> I thi
severity 333265 important
thanks
as long as this is not reported happening to anyone, I guess it is
unreproducible.
Can you please try if latest from unsable solves your problem?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /r
severity 334621 important
thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:42:06AM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird
> Version: 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Thunderbird reverts to plain authentication for SMTP, in order to
> provide more
Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:07:51AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Severity: serious
>
> The current mozilla package fails to build on
tags 325536 + confirmed
thanks
will get into next upload.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:18:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:11:26AM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:08:14PM +1000, Joel wrote:
> Given that the restriction applies to firefox and thunderbird it
> probably applies to SunBird as well right?
>
>
Yes it does, but sunbird won't ship in debian etch as they don't
release from any stable branch. However, I guess removing it
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:25:51PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> i'm guessing from the comment "Also, they distribute non-free software as
> plug-ins" that gnuzilla has messed with the plugin finder, is this something
> that debian wants? (it seems like it would interfere with a lot of users who
> wa
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:54:51AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> okay this one works fine, but it's on english :( Not so bad but maybe the
> maintainer could package the german version, too ;)
>
Not sure how lang packs are distributed for lightning ... but if they
are available, may
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:44:28PM +1000, Robert Moonen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb /usr/bin/icedove
instead use:
$ icedove -g
and do the same as before to get a backtrace.
Thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack|
reassign 445959 gcc-4.2
thanks
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
This smells like a compiler regression in g++-4.2 or even a buggy
buildd ... 2.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:42:46PM +1200, Richard Patterson wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> This is still a bug, I don't think saying "use the Debian rebranded
> Lightning" constitutes a fix.
> The official Lightning xpi is still broken when trying to use it with
> Icedove.
>
> Replicated on several i
reassign 443440 gtk+-2.0
tags 443440 + patch
thanks
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:55:49AM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.10.dfsg1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Trying to start
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> Hi,
>
> after uprading to 2.0.0.9-2 from 2.0.0.6-1, my addons don't work
> anymore. I tried to uninstall them and reinstall th
tags 459564 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:39:20PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.9-2
> Followup-For: Bug #459564
>
> Starting with this version, my icedove tray icon is broken and the
> Provider for Google Calendar plugin no longer works (my calenda
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Benoit Plessis wrote:
>> //pref("network.protocol-handler.external.http", true);
>
> This is clearly not a bug fix, merely an workaround ..
> By doing this you prevent openning of http link in your mails, which is (to
> me at least) more useful than displa
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 06:13:24PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #425061
>
Can you please start icedove in -safe-mode and see if it still
happens?
# icedove -safe-mode
thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Deb
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 01:00:09PM +0300, Török Edvin wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-2
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> The following directories are empty after installing icedove 2.0.0-2:
> /usr/lib/icedove/defaults
> /usr/lib/icedove/chrome
> /usr/lib/iced
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:42:56PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Firefopx started to crash too...
>
OK, thanks for confirming this.
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:32:24PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ icedove --debug
> /usr/lib/icedove/run-mozilla.sh -g /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin
> MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/lib/i
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:19:47PM +0100, Martin Orr wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
>
> The upgrade 1.5 -> 2.0 still doesn't convert the directories in
> /usr/lib/icedove to symlinks correctly. The chrome directory is converted,
> but defaults and greprefs a
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:28:12PM +0200, Thomas Renard wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Followup-For: Bug #425390
>
> I am not able to create a new profile with a new user account with 2.0.0.0-3.
>
> The normal behavior on first startup of icedove would be:
>
> - (Dialog) ask fo
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:13:56PM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Have you upgraded icedove? If not ... please purge it ... and
reinstall. There are issues with current upgrade that might cause
rando
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Igor Stirbu wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-3
> Followup-For: Bug #425390
>
>
> It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts.
> I started icedove with the following command:
Try:
first uninstall ... then install icedove again.
- A
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:14:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You fixed it up for amd64 - what about the rest of us?
>
Be patient ... let the buildd finish :).
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The unive
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 07:27:47PM -0700, JT Hundley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> After upgrading to the new Icedove and restarting, my address book
> is still empty, yet the data is still in my book.ab file.
Try to uninstall icedove ... and install again.
- Ale
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:24:18PM -0700, JT Hundley wrote:
> That fix worked! Thanks a ton!
>
> Bryan Bayerdorffer wrote:
> > I had the same problem even after purge/reinstall of 2.0.0.0-4. I
> > noticed that omitting the pre-2.0 prefs.js made the address book work.
> > I blew away the followin
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Simon Waters wrote:
> >
> > I will try purging the packages as per the original poster.
>
> No joy with purge reinstall.
>
> The problem here maybe resolved, hard to be sure.
>
> I disabled all functional extensions, and re-enabled
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:42:49PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 2.0.0.0-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi, I get this error while I try to use icedove, downloads messages
> and says "Receiving 1 of 1" and then stops and gives this b
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez wrote:
> I have found this very same problem in Gutsys's version of
> Thunderbird. So I downloaded sid's icedove-dbg package and generated
> the following backtrace. I now this is not a proper debian system, but
> hope it helps.
Can
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:31:59PM +0200, Miguel Rodríguez Pérez wrote:
> I have found this very same problem in Gutsys's version of
> Thunderbird. So I downloaded sid's icedove-dbg package and generated
> the following backtrace. I now this is not a proper debian system, but
> hope it helps.
Wha
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Andreas von Heydwolff wrote:
> May have to do with spell checking: Things went smoother after switching off
> Spell-as-you-type, nevertheless this behavior is new and and I used SAYT
> before on a regular basis.
>
>
Ok thanks ... this is probably a sp
Yes, I am aware of this issue ... however, I have not yet verified if
sarge version is affected. If so it should definitly get a security
update.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Debian Bugreport Mailaddress wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail
> Version: 2:0.91-4sarge2
> Sever
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 06:17:31PM +0100, David Andel wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.9.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After first startup, the import of mail folders seemed to work fine, then the
> main window showing the mail lists appeared and
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:26:26PM +0100, Debian Bugreports Mailaddress wrote:
> Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> > Yes, I am aware of this issue ... however, I have not yet verified if
> > sarge version is affected. If so it should definitly get a security
> > update
retitle 406604 CVE-2006-5877: Enigmail crashes on inline gpg
thanks
this is CVE-2006-5877
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Debian Bugreport Mailaddress wrote:
> Package: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail
> Version: 2:0.91-4sarge2
> Severity: grave
>
> Enigmail has had a serious bug for a lo
tags 406862 + patch
thanks
As Mike pointed out in the iceape bug (#406861), this is probably:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302250
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages pr
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.5.0.8.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
>
>
> Hi,
>
> since upgrade to the dfsg version, I already had to kill and restart
> icedove already ~5 times since yesterday.
> Phenomens are very different but it alway
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:45:13AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. First, I'd like to apologize but after 2 or 3
> hangs, I got mad and already saw icedove going in this state into stable,
> and I possibly overreacted a bit (I'd like to stay at etch
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 09:45:13AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs wrote:
>
> One more thing I remembered having forgotten to tell while doing all this
> :-[ : my "Mail" folder is on a separate FAT32 partition, in order to be
> able to share my folders with Windows (dual-boot). I know, it's not
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
>
> On one of my accounts mails with a certain spam level get their subject
> line rewritten so one can easily see this information. I first did a
> search for this pattern, removing all found messages.
How is this done?
>
> Th
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
>
> Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> | On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:31:17PM +0100, Caspar Bothmer wrote:
> |>line rewritten so one can easily see this information. I first did a
> |>search for this patter
tags 402886 + unreproducible
thanks
if no-one can reproduce, this can be downgraded to important.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexa
close 393182 1.5.0.8-1
thanks
transitional thunderbird-dev package should be provided as of icedove
1.5.0.8-1.
If there are still problems, let me know.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 03:14:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: thunderbird-dev
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.5.0.7-2
>
> Hi
>
> You
tags 382385 + patch
thanks
This is due to new the more strict behaviour of current gcc.
A patch for this is available in thunderbird package:
debian/patches/90_gcc-extern-fix.dpatch
maybe it needs backporting
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:47AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: mozi
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:48:37PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
> Package: thunderbird
> Version: 1.5.0.4-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> running /usr/bin/thunderbird gives no feedback; running
> /usr/lib/thunderbird/thunderbird-bin states that it cannot find li
reopen 382445
severity 382445 important
tags 382445 + unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:44:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
> nothing happens. No process; ps auxw shows nothing related to
> thunderbird. So I try to run thunderbird via /usr/lib/thunderbird-bin
> from the comma
retitle 376572 produce enigmail binary for mozilla/seamonkey
severity 376572 wishlist
thanks
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander S
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:34:24AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Severity: serious
>
> Mozilla applications are known to require a lot of maintainance, and
> this is particularly true for the huge Mozilla suite. The 6 Mozilla
> updates since Sarge's release should show that,
Please try to verify that this problem exists if you start a fresh
account/profile.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack
tags 383344 + unreproducible
tags 383344 + moreinfo
thanks
Please be responsive if you file a GRAVE bug ... if noone else reports
this problem, I will downgrade this.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:15:35PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> Please try to verify that this problem exi
OK,
I am preparing a new package revision that produces debug
symbols. Since I have no amd64 box at hand, would you volunteer to
respin this package on your machine in order to get a readable
backtrace (Of course, I would provide instructions)?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is
retitle 383344 thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
tags 383344 + help
thanks
Can anyone with amd64 platform confirm this? I would like to see at
least one other voice to justify this package with security fixes to
not enter testing.
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:59:04AM -0400, Simon Valiquette wrote:
>
> I am using Mozilla and Netscape for ages (well, since I stopped
> surfing on Goopher web sites). For different reasons, I always
> disliked Firefox/Thunderbird and preferred a better integrated
> interface (memory is cheap an
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:09:53AM -0500, John McMonagle wrote:
> Please get this available asap.
> Only 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b. is available for sarge and it is seriously flawed.
>
> All the previous versions that worked are no longer available.
>
> Have users that need to get work done.
>
> Manag
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:56PM +0200, emilio brambilla wrote:
> hello,
>
> I can confirm too that version 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b.2 from
> http://people.debian.org/~asac/security/ works correctly and solve the
> bug on both the workstation I have here!
>
As you are a sarge desktop user, please k
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:24:58PM +0200, Daniel Smolik wrote:
> I use previous version of mozilla from http://snapshot.debian.net/ (great
> site)
> and it works without problem.
> Dan
>
new packages are on its way. You can get a cure on i386 now by using
packages from my security preview archiv
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:21:05PM +0200, Florian Boelstler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> version 1.0.2-2.sarge1.0.8b.2 from asac works fine here as well on two
> systems running Sarge.
>
Would you volunteer to test "pre-releases" for next security updates?
I would notify you by mail as soon as there are pro
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:43:36AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 1.8.0.9-1
> Severity: critical
>
> xulrunner has security issues which are fixed in 1.8.0.10-3
>
xulrunner (1.8.0.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Mike Hommey ]
* New upstream release (taken from
Didn't you get that error with iceape as well?
So, please let us know what is special about your setup, anything
right off your head?
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:28:16PM +0200, David Andel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 14:52 +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > Didn't you get that error with iceape as well?
>
> yes
>
> > So, please let us know what is special about your setup,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:11:43PM +0200, David Andel wrote:
>
> Since the last email I have started and stopped icedove several times
> without a problem. But then I've compacted that first folder again, and
> icedove crashed. And then it crashed after startup again. Removing the
> .msf file a
79 matches
Mail list logo
